I came across this by chance and it caught my eye. I suppose I felt like reading a bit of a trashy crime book. And, it does what it says on the tin. Although he suggests in the introduction that he is writing this to better understand why people become serial killers and how many could be stopped before the start, he does little of the first and nothing of the second, so for thrilling horrific tales and no required thinking, this is your book.
As he describes, Mexico would appear to be the perfect place for serial killers. Between the landscape, the poverty, life is cheap and the immense drug cartel problem, the police don't have the capacity to deal with everything. And when poor people die, or sex workers die, people don't care as much. As if those lives weren't worth so much.
The sexist, macho culture comes out in this. The killers he tells us about span the last 100 years. One of the first, who killed a number of women around the 30s or 40s actually ended up with a presidential pardon because he was such a nice guy, studied the law in prison and helped some other inmates out. I just.... what the actual... a pardon???? That is for people falsely imprisoned and completely different to the idea of people having served their time. What an awful sexist, disposable woman culture lingering behind that.
The various stories of killers cover all the clichés of Mexico you would expect, drug cartels, macho men, drink and drugs, Mexican wrestlers, ancient death cults and so on. The social problems are immense, with poverty, major lack of education and prolific child abuse, which is cyclical as so many of the mothers are only young teenagers themselves, forced into prostitution to support themselves. It is a book of incredible sadness, not just the murders as if that wasn't enough but also the extremely messed up childhoods and what people will casually do to one another.
And did he have a bet on with someone as to how many times he could get the word heinous in there?
Not a reflection posed by the book itself, but the more of these things I read the more I think that it must be a cry for the need for better children's services everywhere, to nip those potential cases in the bud, and a nod to the importance of education when you see how it is often poverty stricken communities with a lack of education that are often taken in. But all that requires more tax, and you get those who rant, why should I pay that? I am not a child, I am not going to use that service bla bla bla... does no one get that it is an investment in a better future society? Mind you, in a country such as that Clarkson is portraying, just upping the taxes would be like a drop in the ocean as there is so much to be done. Still, you have to start somewhere.