Ransom is one of those books it's difficult to rate. In some ways it could get four stars. In others, it could net only two. And honestly, the rating might depend on the day or my mood or about a hundred other factors. So as with many books like it, Ransom's rating goes right in the middle. This last book in the trilogy might well be a case of the author "saving the best for last." In some ways, it goes everywhere I wanted and needed the trilogy to go. Craft-wise though, it's a mixed bag, an up and down experience.
So as always with books like this, let's start with the good stuff. The world of Vita Nova is not as three-dimensional as some worlds I have seen, but it feels absolutely real. Moreover, it feels close and urgent, as if it could realistically exist. I don't think Raena Rood wrote Vita Nova that way to scare readers, though. I think she created and wrote Vita Nova with a good sense that, this is a beat dystopian fiction needs to hit. More importantly, Vita Nova feels less like a closed circle dystopian world--though that's what it is--than a world that encapsulates the conflicts real people are experiencing on small levels and could experience on large ones. Thus, Ransom has a lot of moments where the story isn't about "us vs. them." It's more, "understanding life vs. tragically misinterpreting it."
That's another strong point--the theme of life and death permeates this novel. In a lot of ways, it's too "on the nose," which I'll explain in a minute. But when it's not, the theme completely works. The defiance of the human spirit, the part of us that says, "live" even in the most dire circumstances, bursts out of this book. Plus, Raena Rood is not afraid to unite that with the fact, living is hard and heartbreaking. Living is messy. Sometimes there are shades of gray, sometimes there are no good choices, the "good guys" and "bad guys" aren't obvious and can cross into each other's camps. Characters like Chanda Devlin, Lucas Pine, and even kids like Vance and Violet, do a wonderful job of showing this.
I also got a chill, in a good way, from the psychological themes and dialogue here. Every time Victor, Sienna, or someone else tried to gaslight Kira or make her out to be the villain, I empathized with her. I cheered her on because, in less life-altering ways, I've been there. It hurts, and I recognized that in Kira's position, it might break me. But Kira legitimately inspired me to remember how strong I could be, to push past the initial hurt, and find the real truth under the twisted version (which is really a bunch of lies). The character arcs here could be done better, if they exist at all. But that particular part of Kira's development kept me hooked.
Finally, although the characters aren't strong--which, Ransom is plot-driven so I'll forgive it--I did enjoy some of the small moments where Raena showed me who a character was and could be. Kira's the big one, of course. Raena also did this with Chandra and even Donna, in ways that fit the story but had their own little twists. (That is, these women are the kinds of characters you might expect in a dystopian story. They're "types." But, they are unique people with unique motives).
I liked that here, I sympathized and empathized with Ghost a lot more, because I understood him better. And if I can gush for just a minute, I absolutely loved Adeline Fleming. Her little "touches" to Rolling Meadows, like the books on the nightstand and the sneaky absence of Volunteer blue, made me cheer. In truth, I wanted Adeline or a character like her to have her or his own book (I'm getting to that).
Now, what are the weak points, the stuff that makes the rating hard? Well the good news is, it's not so much what I usually see with Raena Rood (i.e., so much focus on running and escaping, there's no time for much else). The good news is also that, this story stands so strong on its own, I think she could've dropped Rebellion entirely and given readers the info from that book in Ransom, just in different ways.
The bad news is, there are still some classic Raena Rood pitfalls here. Some of these are actual criticisms, like the last third is breakneck fast, but also a bit repetitive. I mean, the final mission and the actual finding and rescuing gets dragged out for chapters on end. (It's not totally egregious because the chapters are short, but I did feel dragged through the story). Also, Ransom often reads like Kira and especially Will are satellites to their own stories. I don't know if that's because the novel is plot-driven, because of the literal life and death stakes, or what, but I found myself caring more about people like Adeline or Chandra than the main couple. I found myself saying, "These are the people who have stories. These are the people who might be affected the most depending on whether Kira or Victor triumphs." And for this story, that's not so good.
Now, I'm going to move on to something that's more a critique than a criticism. This is me the writer, not me the reviewer, talking, so stay with me. Raena has great "bone structure" in Ransom and the Vita Nova trilogy. She knows how to tell an action-packed, sensory-filled story (and she knows that better than I do, so brownie points). If you know my reviews, you know I don't normally go for plot-driven stories, but hers is the type I would read.
That said, Raena falls short on the deeper stuff, like themes, character, and spirituality. I love the fact that in Ransom, she has characters confronting the truth of, we've become comfortable with death and we shouldn't. Death is not inherently good; it's painful and it's ugly. That's great. Symbolism like Kira's yellow dress, is also great. The problem is, at the same time, you have characters making literal speeches or monologues that contradict each other. The symbolism can't be subtle because it's "exciting," but it's hammered into your head. You can cheer for the deliverance of the people of Vita Nova and Haven, but you can't get "into" it as much more than an action story because well, for the most part, you don't know these people.
Additionally, I applaud Raena for writing a book that essentially hinges on a revolution, and for exploring the different ways people choose to revolt or respond to such (see the contrast between Ghost and Lyle, or even Ghost and Will, for instance). After a while though, you combine that with a breakneck pace and a lot of literal "telling," and you start to feel, "This is 'us vs. them. It's too simple.'"
Contrast characters like Adeline, who are definitely not "going along to get along," but are more subtle in how they cope. Contrast characters like Teddy, who granted, is six years old and wouldn't be the best point of view character, but--yeah. What about people who have literally no choices? Who are the heart of the story, the reason for why characters do what they do, but then--are just kinda "there?" Contrast characters like Chandra, who've made their choices and still have a bunch of complex feelings and no real path forward. I think Raena had a great opportunity to go a lot deeper, and she didn't take it. Maybe that's a genre thing and if yes, that's fine, but it would've made this book stand out in a market saturated with Christian dystopia.
Ah, and speaking of Christian, that's my last point. Raena does have a great scene in Ransom where Kira contrasts Victor Devlin with a real father caring for his children (and that could also be a capital H). She makes a good choice in having Christian or Christian-coded characters express real doubt. And yet...for me, there was something missing. Namely, Raena makes clear human life is sacred and the actions of Victor and his supporters are wrong. Yet, as I mentioned in my review of Reverence, she doesn't exactly contrast that with Christ's sacrifice.
After all, the word "sacrifice" is used constantly in this book. People who force their fellow humans to "trade" their lives for others' lives, permeate this book. And yet, there's no clear contrast between that, and the fact, Jesus Christ died so humans could live. His sacrifice was true and right; Vita Nova's sacrifices are not. It's a fine line to walk because if Raena had chosen to have that in dialogue, it would've gotten too preachy. Personally though, I'd have *really* liked to see some kind of discussion or contrast on that point.
So, in summary, Ransom is not a "bad" book. Like so many of its kind, it has a lot of great points. I would recommend both it and Reverence (the first book in the trilogy) if this is the kind of read you like best or connect with most. I would say though, that there are better and less borderline cliche ways to write Christian dystopia, so maybe read this in conjunction with something else.