Received with gratitude from NetGalley for free in exchange for feedback and an honest review. I read the entire book from start to finish.
This book is somewhere between historical fantasy and non-consent/reluctance erotica. The story is set in an idyllic fictional agrarian kingdom that is quickly poisoned with nasty right-wing rhetoric before a coup plunges the country into a dystopian police state. The new king reintroduces anti-humanist policies that explicitly benefit the rich and uses populist rhetoric and underhanded tactics to gain support from rural communities. He creates a world where women are pressed into sexual slavery for advancement or even to survive (thus the “will to survive” tagline!) but many die when they try to fight back or when they attempt to free themselves.
While I think I might have enjoyed the story of it were more erotica, or more fantasy and less explicit sexual descriptions, I felt that where it landed missed the mark on both. I would have wanted more sex for Erotica. I would have wanted more worldbuilding and character building for fantasy. However my biggest struggle by far was the quality of the writing.
The beginning of this book was not strong and I didn’t feel much of a hook. From the beginning, the writing is very tell-not-showy, to the point where most of the prose and even character dialogue is exposition. People are good (and usually victims) or bad (usually perpetrators) and things are overly simple and occasionally feel out of place. I also find that I struggled with the inconsistencies within the characters themselves which made it challenging to enjoy the story or even to want to continue.
Here is an example of a character I struggled to understand and therefore care about or believe in. The good king is naive and has only 1 advisor! That advisor was a childhood friend! That advisor protected him from being beaten up (what??) by the local bullies! That friend doesn’t try to rescue the king but rides out and spends 4 years “blending in” so that he can rescue the king (but gathers no allies, raises no money, practices no swordplay, doesn’t attempt to help the king escape, doesn’t gather intel, nor even find out if the king is still alive… I will be honest, with a friend like this, who needs enemies? And what king gets bullied as a kid? And which of those kings only has one friend and advisor? And what advisor feels that spending 4 years as a farmer is the best way to rescue the king? And why does the new king keep him around despite the intrinsic threat? For fun?
Here is what I liked:
- Intentional or not, it’s clearly an allegory for Trump. An idealistic king implements reforms but a right wing populist overthrows him and rolls back reforms on behalf of the rich elite, even though he has a strong (and violent) base in rural areas. After 4 years, the King’s (Obama) right hand man and advisor and close friend (Biden) organizes a rebellion to take the crown back.
- Honestly, the Mildrea-Brothel scenes and interactions were strong and good and I felt the character development there was strong and consistent and the story was better. I’d read a more in depth story about Mildrea.
- There are some real flashes of poetic brilliance from the author, consistent enough that I know there is real talent in there. Between exposition, there occasional lovely phrases like this:
“Farnsley was walking the valley between boyhood and manhood, and truth be told, he found it all a bit frightening.” Or about the two younger sisters in jail, “…they whimpered and cowered like frightened puppies.”
I will also say that the scene that the title is taken from (who is it?/somebody’s daughter) was quite poignant, and sad, and beautiful in a tragic sort of way. It was one of the only times that I felt *I* as the reader felt something rather than being told outright what the author wanted me to feel.
In summary, I see a ton of potential here but struggled to get invested in the book from page one. With an excellent editor, and more focus and consistency in character development and plotting, it could be a very solid debut effort. However as it stands, I can not recommend the novel in its current form.