King Charles II is known for his amorous ways and numerous mistresses. His first love (fling…crush… call it what you will but the mother to his first child) was during his teen years at the onset of the Civil War with a Welsh girl, Lucy Walter. Rumored to have secretly married Lucy; Charles sired a royal bastard with her (James, later Duke of Monmouth). Elizabeth Goudge fictionalizes and romanticizes the life of Lucy Walter in the HF novel published in 1970 in, “The Child from the Sea”.
Although there is information available surrounding Lucy’s behavior once Charles became King; her upbringing and even relationship with Charles is rather shadowy. This absence of hard-hitting truths allowed Goudge plenty of space and liberty to create a web with Lucy’s characterization and the plot that is all her own. “The Child from the Sea” starts with Lucy’s childhood and is admittedly ‘slow’ for the first 200 pages. Goudge tries to set the scene and create a basis for Lucy’s personality but the pages seem somewhat ‘pointless' and not going anywhere. Plus, Goudge is much too literal and descriptive with her prose. The best historical fiction novels find the perfect balance of literary language to dialogue but the beginning of “The Child from the Sea” is too flowery and therefore doesn’t always flow well with the pace.
Once this passes, events in “The Child from the Sea” pick-up and Lucy becomes firmer in her characterization and development. Even though Lucy’s personality is purely fictional in “The Child from the Sea” and therefore not to be taken with a heavy history hand; Goudge succeeds in making her more of a person and having readers familiar with the read history consider her in a new light over that merely of a mistress and overprotective mother to James. Alongside this, Charles is also revealed in a new way and a man known for his mistresses instead displays innocent, first love and is therefore very relatable.
“The Child from the Sea” is much more fictional than history even though the background events and speaking dialogue is accurate for the times. In many ways, the novel borderlines a romance novel (not a bodice-ripper, though) and is a bit too fluffy and lovey-dovey when describing the relationship between Lucy and Charles. Often times, their actions, feelings, and speech towards each other at only 16 years of age is highly unbelievable even during a time when children were basically considered adults at this benchmark.
On the other hand, Goudge deviates from the fluff with philosophical meanderings which go beyond the plot and are worth dwelling on at any time/age. Goudge was clearly a deep individual and her intellectual thoughts were interspersed into “The Child from the Sea”.
It should be noted that Goudge is highly impressive with her ability to create characters. Each character has a distinct, clear voice and settings are described so vividly that it is highly notable that one person can pen and create these in one single mind. “The Child from the Sea” is comparable to classic lit novels in this way. Plus, Goudge’s prose and language is beautiful and well-written.
“The Child from the Sea” becomes highly repetitive as it progresses which isn’t helped by an absence of reader emotional involvement. Although Lucy and Charles encounter charged-events; this isn’t translated to the reader and thus they aren’t fully ‘felt’. Basically; Lucy and the reader aren’t on the same level which makes the reading boring, on some level.
The final chapters reveal Lucy much more brightly than on previous pages. It is the first that the reader can truly emphasize and cheer for her. Sadly, at this point, Goudge starts to rush to the end which is a stark contrast to a generally slow-paced novel. The conclusion is mild but doesn’t disappoint.
Goudge includes a brief one-page note to explain the outcomes of figures in the novel but doesn’t dive deep, doesn’t address Lucy, or explain historical inaccuracies.
“The Child from the Sea” suffers from many punctuation and grammar errors throughout the text. Perhaps editors were more lax in 1970?
Goudge’s “The Child from the Sea” still stands out 46 years as being the only HF novel focusing on Lucy Walter and is therefore recommended for those interested in the mistresses of Charles II. However, the novel can be described as slow and dragged out (plus overly descriptive) and therefore as uneventful. Basically, the novel toggles up-and-down in strength but it is suggested for readers of Stuart England (but be aware that this novel is romanticized).
**Note: “The Child from the Sea” is a very waxing and waning book which is a 3 at some points while being a 4 at others. My rating is therefore a 3.5 but with halves unavailable; I have rounded up to a 4. The novel is, however, not to be thought of as a strong 4.**