What do you think?
Rate this book


249 pages, Kindle Edition
First published August 16, 2022
Urban fantasy style
Bleeding Hearts, like its predecessor, isn't necessarily the type of fantasy that shows you pages dripping with magic. This volume has Eliza doing a lot more already, and I love that, but I'm getting the feeling Provost is more focused on the story and her -as it turns out now - intricate plot than she is on showing fantasy. We do find out that demons exist – not the biblical kind – next to witches, seers and ghosts, but in general the amount of supernatural creatures is limited in the Poison Garden world.
Book two shows clearly what kind of Urban Fantasy we're dealing with -more so than the 'starter volume'. I wouldn't recommend this series to readers who only prefer The Hollows, the Kara Gillian, or Kate Daniels series – to name a few of my favourites - where main characters and their world are all magic all day and its the core motivator of the story most of the time. If you really want a more extensive world-building and supernaturals flexing their magical muscles every chapter, then Poison Garden might not be your first choice, or a choice at all.
That's not to say both Oleander and Bleeding Hearts don't show and tell about magic. The people involved deal with it plenty of times (and judging from book 2 and its ending will do so more). It's part of the story, makes main character Eliza Moore who she is, but it isn't her daily practice, her bread and butter. Nor is the world around her infused with it extensively. If you like a focus on interpersonal relationships, overcoming your demons - in this case predominantly the mental ones - within a paranormal context, and like the idea of how we're afraid of the monsters under our bed but should fear (magically enhanced) humans much more, you should pick up Poison Garden 1 & certainly #2.
We want Moore
Bleeding Hearts – explaining the title would be a major spoiler, so I won't – ends once again open ended. Unlike Oleander though we end the book with a proper cliffhanger (of sorts). With sweat in our hands and said hands in our hair, we wonder: how is Eli going to fix this mess?! Because while puzzle pieces were falling left and right, new problems arise as well. It's almost as if we're dealing with several mysteries at once. All linked and some not even showing yet. I need to know more! Simply put: I want more Moore.
In my previous review I mentioned that my reading load often ruins books for me because I'm not easily surprised and see events coming a mile away. Book 1 wasn't “an open book”, but still not surprising enough. The author definitely redeems herself completely this time. The steam train that started running with Oleander, Poison Garden 1, has obviously picked up speed. Bleeding Hearts was full steam ahead, letting several story lines and simple mentions from the first book come together. I was flattened on the rails for sure.
As said: I love it when I'm right! But I love it even more when I've just enjoyed a good book. Poison Garden 2 is everything I expected AND hoped. I read it in one go and said “Nooooo!” at the final page, because I was done too soon. In its particular UF corner Bleeding Hearts deserves a rating of four stars* and I'm for sure going to get the next installment in the series. Which is definitely a great rating in itself...
(* My way of rating
As a reviewer I have the reputation to be relatively critical. I was so when I reviewed in the spiritual/ self- help/occult sector - even gaining me the sometimes uncomfortable position of "deciding factor" for resellers needing to add stock to their (web)shops. I will never gain that for regular novels, but my opinion might still sway the average reader.
People are often weary when someone has received a book for free. Can we trust that reviewer to be honest? I can understand that. Some reviewers simply can't take the pressure or fear being blacklisted. I. Don't. Care. Perhaps it's the old school (Dutch) journalist in me, but to me being a reviewer means being honest and as objective as possible while using the same checklist, genre cadre and former book comparisons to use f.e.
The only thing I'm careful in, is that I try my hardest to have arguments for my criticism and to not be rude. No matter how bad you think a book is, a real human being is behind it. Other than that I think like this: If I decide to review, my job is to inform regardless of the way that book ended up with me. According to my BookSirens stats based on Goodreads I quite often score books lower than the majority. I guess that means I'm a rarity. Oh well, what else is new 😁. For you it also means that if we have a similar taste and you've noticed we agree on many books, from now on my 4 & 5 star recommendations (maybe even the 3*) will give you your moneys worth for sure.
I don't give a 4- star review quickly, and a 5- star one is even rarer. Even though I see others hand those out left and right. I've often been asked why mine are rare. Apart from the aforementioned there are a few other reasons.
Again: I read a lot, and have been since age 6 - I am not easily convinced anymore. Secondly, I am supposed to review these books and that means looking at all their parts. Initial enthusiasm might sway someone to give it 5 stars, but when you truly look at a book in order to inform other readers on several accounts it's just not logical to be handing out 5 stars as were they Halloween candies to 'trick or treaters'.
I have a maximum of 5 stars, which thus means 5=a perfect rating. (I much prefer 1-10 with half or quarter points, but unfortunately I don't have that option and flexibility). Pair that with the fact I can be as honest as can be, but never a 100% objective, and I need a personal extra “check” for a 5 star review. Do I expect to put the book or series in my Top xx- list and/or will I probably reread the series/ book at one point? Yes? (Even though that doesn't happen often either). Then it goes from a 4 to 5 stars. Anything else is 4 or below that. Btw, don't forget that a 3 star rating seems like a low result, but 3* still means “good”.)
Disclaimer: I was lucky enough to receive an ARC of Bleeding Hearts through BookSirens, but I'm leaving this honest review completely voluntarily.