What do you think?
Rate this book


192 pages, Paperback
First published September 1, 2000
A good or great writer may refuse to accept any responsibility or morality that society wishes to impose on her. Yet the best and greatest of them know that if they abuse this hard-won freedom, it can only lead to bad art.Roy has a way with words that I'm likely never going to be capable of resisting. Couple that with commentary that cuts through some of the foggiest shores of propaganda that I swallowed whole in the tender years of elementary school and you get a read that will always be vital. Roy doesn't offer me anything particularly revelational, but the amount of concrete citation she provides for judgments that I've been making since I officially left undergrad is borderline invaluable. I don't always agree with her metaphors (the sooner she stops looking to psychiatric institutions to supply herself with evocations of sadism and plain old bad faith, the better), but nearly twenty years have gone by since my memories of mixing up Afghanistan and Taliban on dinner time TV (god, I feel old), and fascism has only thrown down more roots. I have to tell students so filled with hatred for their origins that they want to change their name how much a part their beloved US plays in the loathsome quantities of their inherited India. You know something is obscenely wrong when a white person like me is called upon to do such work.
If what we have to say doesn't "sell," will we still say it?
Is globalization about "eradication of world poverty," or is it a mutant variety of colonialism, remote controlled and digitally operated?This collection is composed of five essays of various degrees of power, leastwise to my estimation. "The Algebra of Infinite Justice" was the most relevant to my own sphere of influence, so I'm likely to remember it the most. I also found much worth "The Ladies Have Feelings, So...", but that was also due to the fact of it being the first of the collection, and so many of the witty repartees I made note of existed in their first iteration here. All cover issues that should be the ones taught in high school amidst engineering-brainwashing STEM and the pathetic pseudoscience cult of the rich that is economics, as it has been manipulated into since slavery was (officially, save for specially crafted circumstances) outlawed and the Internet was invented. Time has passed since Roy's words were published, but if I live to seem them rendered irrelevant, I don't know whether to hope for such an outcome or pray that it doesn't get any worse. All citizens of the world are not created equal, and the most powerful country in the world defends to the point of genocide the ability of its rich to cannibalize the poor through the tried and true method of divide and conquer.
"Creating a good investment climate" is the new euphemism for third world repression.
Terrorism is the symptom, not the disease.The US House Speaker has officially started impeachment proceedings against Trump, and I'm wondering whether this will fizzle out into self-obliging putz like everything else that has come since 2016. I have enough going on my life these days that I don't obsess over it all nearly as much as I used to, so Roy giving me a good kick in the rear can be taken in a far more considering way than my younger self would have had the patience for. I still don't apply the these lessons of hers as practically as I would like to in my day to day existence, but I'm on the way to doing so in the next five years, if not by the end of next summer. Then again, by then we may all die in the fire next time, so we'll just have to see.
President Bush's ultimatum to the people of the world—"Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists"—is a piece of presumptuous arrogance.
It's not a choice that people want to, need to, or should have to make.