This is the life story of Stuart Briscoe, an Englishman who travelled throughout the world speaking about the Gospel before settling down to pastor a church in the U.S.
All lives involve choices, and this story tells how Briscoe made decisions at certain points along the way, notably whether to pursue a career in banking after getting off to a very promising start or to give that up and go into full-time ministry, and then whether to continue with a stimulating series of trips to speak in far-flung outposts around the world or to stay home with his family and one congregation. He reveals a measure of the soul-searching that went on at such times. I wondered, however, if there hadn't been other defining moments that he omits. For example, he completely glosses over the decision and experience of becoming a Christian in the first place. His father was a minister, and so naturally he was exposed to the Gospel from an early age, but I was sorry that he treated his own acceptance of Christ as something no more out of the ordinary than putting on clothes.
Likewise, he never really talks about moments of doubt. He does mention confusion caused by a brief period when he was in danger of losing his voice, but I can't help wondering whether there weren't moments when his faith was tested on a more basic level. There have been in my case. I would have appreciated a frank discussion of how he came through those times.
Perhaps the problem is in deciding whom the book is written for. I think someone outside the ministry might have trouble staying with this narrative, because the latter half is largely concerned with questions of church governance and the challenges of ministering to people with divergent expectations and needs. Although I'm a church-goer, in recent years I've preferred to stay on the periphery of things, and so questions of how to keep congregants and deacons happy did not greatly interest me.
There's no question that the life he describes has been full, meaningful, and important. I bought his book after hearing him speak at my church, because I wanted some insight into how he'd reached the point of being able to deliver such a thoughtful and effective message. And yet, aside from a few brief passages that come to life on the page, the narrative kept me feeling very much at arms' length.
In telling a story, an author needs to strike a balance between dramatizing scenes that are important and summarizing the rest. Bringing everything to life on the page can bury the story in needless details. On the other hand, summarizing everything deprives the reader of a sense of involvement. Just where one draws the line is a matter of opinion, but I feel that there is far too much summary in Briscoe's memoir. Here's a typical example:
"Soon three things happened in Jill's life. She discovered abilities she did not know she had. Other people saw her floundering, trying to use gifts she didn't have, and out of pity voluntered to help. And the church began to see her unique gifts that lay outside the box and encouraged her in the development of them. Win! Win! Win!"
(In this instance he's talking about his wife, and I realize it gets tricky in memoir when the author is discussing the experience of someone other than himself. I ran into the same challenge in writing my own memoir. But even in a case like this there must be more dramatic, and effective, ways of rendering the events.)
At times the narrative is preachy, and not in a way I found particularly edifying or empowering. In short, as a memoir, this is weaker than it could have been. But this takes nothing away from the admirable life he clearly has lived.