***Let me just say that 3* for me is a very respectable score, just falling short of "outstanding" (4*) or "I'm so obsessed I've read it till I can quote it backwards" (5*)***
With Hand of Isis I admit I went about this the wrong way in reading it before Black Ships(which I've not actually read), so for me the references to the previous lives the main character Charmion merely served to convolute the story a bit. (My fault for not researching the book and its prequels, oops.)
Not to say that I didn't find the concept of reincarnation fascinating, but there were some parts where it just seemed it was added in clumsily and didn't necessarily give anything to the storyline at hand. If I were to read the other two books I'm sure I would find it interesting to go ahead and reread it with greater understanding, though, and there were some great moments such as when Charmion visits the grave of her previous life family, which certainly piqued my interest.
The characters were interesting, well nuanced and I liked the fact that each of the three sisters represented a trait of the goddess Isis, complimenting each other while not sugar coating the friction such differences caused occasionally. I thought Jo Graham portrayed the bond of sisters extremely well.
Charmion herself was willful, sensual and smart, an active player in her own life and a refreshing voice in that she was extremely well fleshed out, strong and relatable.
Cleopatra, too, was handled with skill, bringing the complex historical character to life through the eyes of her sister.
Iras, I felt, was a decent character but served in only a secondary capacity to her two other sisters, although she was given a few moments of development too.
Dion was a likable character and the love triangle of Charmion, Dion and Emrys was certainly like no love triangle I've read before. I laughed aloud at the timetable they presented to that poor soldier and felt that Jo Graham handled the clashing cultural norms regarding sexuality, the openness of Alexandria vs the disdain of Rome for homosexual practise, very well.
I have to say, it was so refreshing to read from the point of view of such a sexually aware and adventurous character. Her openness in this way and many others made her a truly brilliant character, a pleasure to read.
All good so far. Yet as someone who has read a number of various historical fiction pieces centered around ancient Egypt (covering perspectives from Hatshepsut, Nefertari, Tiye and Mutbenret) I found this portrayal of the country's last dynasty a little lackluster.
It wasn't that I was squeamish about the sex - casual, barely consensual sex was part and parcel of the time period in question so the brief description of the rape of the serving girl and how it was a small event in one page of the story, or Cleopatra's own political agenda in losing her virginity seemed authentic to me. I know some people have found that distasteful but that's not my issue at all.
The reason I have given a three star review, not a four or five was just that there lacked a certain oomph in it for me. It was great, fantastic in some places, but that elusive quality that takes a book from an enjoyable but forgettable three star, although it may have all the right ingredients, to an unforgettable story which stays with you long after you read the last page, were absent.
It's been a year or so since I read it so I can't pinpoint exactly why this was, but I know I found Emrys more than a little dull. He was good, dutiful, sometimes affectionate but he had no spark for me when compared to the more amusing and fleshed out Dion.
I know, complaining about the love interest is a little cliche, especially when I liked the fact his character was an addition to the story, not the driving force behind Charmion's whole life. Yay for a female driven plot focused on the sisters' relationships rather than the men!
That being said (and I can't tell you how much I enjoyed that message of the story) having the MC's love interest hold all the interest of a shriveled kumquat among a bowl of ripe, juicy mangoes for me (personally) was a bit of a disappointment. But you may like kumquats. I just found him blah. Sure, he was from the oh-so-exotic Europe with his strange name and soldier-ly good looks, but he was entirely unforgettable among the cast of strong characters with complex motivations. The romance seemed too...again just blah, aside from the threesome in which Emrys seemed to take a backseat to the more vivacious Charmion and Dion.
Moving on from the yawn-worthy romance though, there was a lot of political intrigue for this book to cover, between the crumbling of the last Ptolemies as they wrangled at each others' throats, Egypt's relationship with Rome, the Roman domestic politics and the perception of the general Egyptian population towards the influence of Rome, and this meant that Jo Graham had an almost impossible job of giving all these angles their due attention in order to world build. A daunting task, no doubt.
I usually love me some good political intrigue, juicy and full of intrigue, yet I remember feeling turned off when this book headed in those directions, I never felt I knew all that much about the other Ptolemies to care about their bickering. Berenice, Tryphaena, neither one given more than a passing glance. With regards to the Egyptian political intrigue information seemed to be just dumped at certain points, dealt with and the plot moved on without showing more to it.
Maybe my issue was that the story was more focused on Rome than Egypt, which honestly makes sense considering the part Caesar and Marc Anthony play, yet I was looking for a heavily Egyptian novel when I opened it. Again, my fault for not researching before reading.
Such minor quibbles aside, it was a very well sculpted novel and I enjoyed the many layers to it, the characters and the incredible scope. It covered a complex period of history and did so with superb realism, spots of humour and intricate detail. While I may have done some things differently, the choices Jo Graham made with story direction and characters were well thought out and she did justice to such an incredible story of history while adding something unique to the Cleopatra narrative, something impressive since it has been rehashed endlessly.