Initial reaction: a strange, wholly original and wonderful book, almost indescribable in its intent and execution. A triumph. It will not appeal to everyone.
One of the advance reviews included on the back cover of The Forest describes the book as “Sebaldian.” The term refers to the oeuvre of German author W.G. Sebald, whose writing “combines memoir, fiction, travelogue, history, and biography in the crucible of his haunting prose style to create a strange new literary compound.” (O’Connell, M. 2011. Why you should read W.G. Sebald. The New Yorker December 14, 2011). This description is equally and perfectly appropriate for Alexander Nemerov’s book.
As Nemerov states up front in an Author’s Note, “This book tells the story of many people. Sometimes they know one another, sometimes they do not. Often, they go their separate ways… Together they make a pattern of life at a given time in the history of the United States. The forest is a backdrop—if not always an actual setting… Trees play an important role, but this is not a book of ecology.” Indeed not.
The book consists of a collection of 58 vignettes, generally shorter near the beginning and progressively longer toward the end. The vignettes are grouped into nine parts, each of which bears a subtitle loosely suggestive of the theme of the vignettes contained therein. The vignettes are all basically structured the same. They open with a story about an incident in the life of one or more historical figures. Slave insurrectionist Nat Turner and gothic writer Edgar Allen Poe feature more than once. Many of the stories then go on to contrast the life of the historical figure with that of another individual of a different social caste or class. Finally, each vignette concludes with a lyrical, speculative digression on the implications of the story for the lives of the people involved, the landscape, or the trajectory of history.
Some of the vignettes are fully (or mostly) true, some are concatenations of several stories that may be related to one another or might be the result of Nemerov’s imagining realistic possibilities. Some are suggested by works of art, photographs, rumors, or tall tales and may not be true at all but are nonetheless plausible. The vignettes are singularly masterful interweavings of historical fact and imagined fiction. As Nemerov cautions later in his Author’s Note, “Each is an episode, an impression… The reader searching for conclusive meanings will be disappointed. The book is a fable, not a history.”
Trees (and, by extension, timber and wood products) are a common theme, but not in every story. In fact, trees and forests may not play a significant part at all other than as a setting. The two stories most closely approaching natural histories are “Longleaf Pine and the Length of Time,” documenting the destruction of the Southeastern longleaf pine forests, and “Shades of Noon,” profiling the decimation of eastern hemlocks to supply tanneries. “Calamity at New Garden” chronicles what may or may not have been the fatal collection of the last specimen of an enigmatic bird species, the “Townsend’s Bunting,” by naturalist John Kirk Townsend in southeastern Pennsylvania in 1833. Other anecdotes relate to prominent 19th century naturalists, botanists and zoologists. Artist John James Audubon struggles to transmute the essence of two live Barn Owls that had been gifted to him onto paper. Eccentric and erratic genius Constantin Rafinesque, a naturalist who named 6,700 plants and many animals, experiences spiritual enlightenment in a Kentucky black locust grove. David Douglas, for whom the Douglas-fir is named, dies in an awful and bizarre accident in Hawai’i.
The stories’ tones are even and uniform, and all are deadly serious. Levity or lightness rarely intrude. While Nemerov’s digressions and summations at the end of the stories are poetic, rhapsodic and sometimes haunting flights of fancy, they can also be dense and obscure, shrouded in hidden meanings and implications, rather than direct and forthright. As a result, they can be somewhat unsatisfying. I occasionally wished Nemerov had restrained himself and been a bit more concrete and less oblique. This is the book’s greatest shortcoming. Notwithstanding, the stories and their digressions are unfailingly arresting and evocative.
Similarly, Nemerov occasionally lets his imagination get the better of himself when he liberally interprets works of art. His speculations are legitimate, but sometimes he stretches credulity in his conjectures about artists’ intentions.
Physically, the collection of vignettes is interrupted amid the eighth part by a grouping of 48 glossy pages of color images. The images depict objects, works of art or landscapes related to the stories. Most (but not all) of the vignettes are related to one or more images included in this section. In many cases, the work of art or the object seem to have inspired Nemerov to investigate the origin of the image and to have built his story around the object. Following the end of the collection of vignettes is a section of notes keyed to the individual vignettes. Based on the notes, Nemerov clearly conducted exhaustive research to prepare for writing each of the stories, and his extensive archival searches are thoroughly documented here. The notes are followed by a section in which Nemerov credits the sources of the images he has included.
Alexander Nemerov is the Carl and Marilynn Thoma Provostial Professor in the Arts and Humanities at Stanford University and author of many books. The Forest is more historical and creative writing than natural history. Natural history and ecological professionals should savor the book for entertainment and enlightenment, for realigning their perspectives, resetting their thinking and steeping themselves in a milieu. Readers in general will be hard pressed to find a more compelling, original, erudite and thought-provoking work of historical literature. As another advance reviewer observes, “After you’ve read this book, most other cultural histories will seem as stale as the straw on the floor.”