For me, this book was a disappointment— and not a “cozy” read
After two books in the series, I am a huge Sebastian fan.
I was also surprised that this third book was not at all “cozy“ reading.
And the fact that Sebastian does not figure prominently in this “not-so-cozy mystery,“ may have something to do with my disappointment… Because he was such a major part in the first two books.
None of the other books that I have read by this author were quite as blatantly sexual.
Considering how the first two books go on so much about Violet and Sebastian and the deep friendship that they had growing up; the challenges that friendship went through as Sebastian went off to war and Violet struggled through marriage and the death of her husband; and considering all of the underhanded dealings Violet discovered in the second book regarding her father‘s part in Violet and Sebastian‘s broken relationship…it was more than disappointing to discover that Violet did very little to act upon it—and more so, to find Sebastian such a minor character in this book, when the first two books did anything BUT treat Sebastian as a secondary character.
With that said, I was disappointed with Violet’s ability to so calmly adopt the “frisky widow“ persona that a previous character in an earlier book had suggested. I felt surprised and puzzled in the developmental change of the character of Violet introduced in the first book as opposed to the Violet we see in the third book.
I also felt that Violet’s lover became a little too possessive too quickly, which also bothered me, and I did not find him as charming as before… but I also felt the same way about Violet—perhaps the whole relationship moved too quickly to feel authentic, considering Violet’s character in the first book. In the first book, she is amused by the suggestion of a widow’s freedom to have a discreet dalliance; in this book, she practically galloped into it at sub-light speed, making it feel out of character.
Interestingly, the plot development in this installment is very different than the those I have experienced in the first two books of the series and in the Lord Julian series (by the same author).
I like the author’s use of humor and wit; I enjoy her ease of writing engaging and clever conversation between the characters. But I found that while the mystery in the story was intriguing, it was not quite as sharp as the mysteries presented in the first two books. I did not feel this book had the same level of excitement. And the story’s flow did not move as quickly as in the previous two books.
If the first book in the series is really good, then the author has to keep trying to create subsequent books that continue to hold the reader. And the author did just that for the second book in the series. However, perhaps what I really find troublesome is that the mystery itself was so much shorter and less well-developed, replaced with lots of time spent in Violet’s bedroom. (It also seemed weird to me that at the very end of the book, as Lachlan and his family are all gathered together for the denouement, that Violet had to specify that she and the man she was with were simply friends, not romantically involved, not engaged, etc. What was the point when it had nothing to do with the mystery at hand?) Maybe this book was rushed??
I am actually tempted just to read the summary of each of the subsequent books on the Internet, to figure out what Violet eventually does rather than slog through (and pay for) another disappointing book.
Some folks may enjoy the story, but this book did not deliver (for me) as the first two books in the series did. I would think if the author was going to change direction and use different tactics to develop the plot and characterizations, he or she would do so gradually. I actually skimmed through a good part of the book just to be able to keep up with the mystery without wasting time in what simply felt like fluff. Arghh!!