What do you think?
Rate this book
Bad Sex: Truth, Pleasure, and an Unfinished Revolution
At thirty-two years old, everything in Nona Willis Aronowitz’s life, and in America, was in disarray. Her marriage was falling apart. Her nuclear family was slipping away. Her heart and libido were both in overdrive. Embroiled in an era of fear, reckoning, and reimagining, her assumptions of what “sexual liberation” meant were suddenly up for debate.
In the thick of personal and political turmoil, Nona turned to the words of history’s sexual revolutionaries—including her late mother, early radical pro-sex feminist Ellen Willis. At a time when sex has never been more accepted and feminism has never been more mainstream, Nona asked What, exactly, do I want? And are my sexual and romantic desires even possible amid the horrors and bribes of patriarchy, capitalism, and white supremacy?
Nona’s attempt to find the answer places her search for authentic intimacy alongside her family history and other stories stretching back nearly two hundred years. Stories of ambivalent wives and unchill sluts, free lovers and radical lesbians, sensitive men and woke misogynists, women who risk everything for sex—who buy sex, reject sex, have bad sex and good sex. The result is a brave, bold, and vulnerable exploration of what sexual freedom can mean. Bad Sex is Nona’s own journey to sexual satisfaction and romantic happiness, which not only lays bare the triumphs and flaws of contemporary feminism but also shines a light on universal questions of desire.
In the thick of personal and political turmoil, Nona turned to the words of history’s sexual revolutionaries—including her late mother, early radical pro-sex feminist Ellen Willis. At a time when sex has never been more accepted and feminism has never been more mainstream, Nona asked What, exactly, do I want? And are my sexual and romantic desires even possible amid the horrors and bribes of patriarchy, capitalism, and white supremacy?
Nona’s attempt to find the answer places her search for authentic intimacy alongside her family history and other stories stretching back nearly two hundred years. Stories of ambivalent wives and unchill sluts, free lovers and radical lesbians, sensitive men and woke misogynists, women who risk everything for sex—who buy sex, reject sex, have bad sex and good sex. The result is a brave, bold, and vulnerable exploration of what sexual freedom can mean. Bad Sex is Nona’s own journey to sexual satisfaction and romantic happiness, which not only lays bare the triumphs and flaws of contemporary feminism but also shines a light on universal questions of desire.
334 pages, Kindle Edition
First published August 9, 2022
193 people are currently reading
5266 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 237 reviews
June 14, 2022
This book was so disorganized and all-over-the-place that I'm not fully sure what I was supposed to gain from reading it. From what I could understand, the thread tying it together was supposed to be the author ending her marriage over "bad sex," but as the book went on, the marriage was mentioned less and less frequently. The author seemed to contradict herself when she said at one point that "bad sex" amounted to a simple lack of "spark" and at another point that it was actually a symptom of a larger problem in her relationship. The discussion of the author's parents also seemed irrelevant to whatever point the author might have been trying to make. For example, the author had an abortion, and after her mom died she found out that she did, too -- OK, so what? While I learned some fun facts about feminist history, and the author quoted other writers as making some interesting points, I also wasted my time reading what seemed like pointless passages about various things the author does and does not find sexy. Yes, the personal is political, but it's the writer's job to show why. Saying that it's bad for conversations about sex or abortion to be taboo isn't an insightful enough point to justify this book's existence. The book also wasn't written in a compelling way. Of course, heterosexual sex for feminists really is something worth thinking about; I suggest that readers interested in these subjects check out books by Katherine Angel, Amia Srinivasan, and Peggy Orenstein.
Thanks to Plume for a galley.
Thanks to Plume for a galley.
September 5, 2022
Unfocused and unsatisfying, like bad sex often is. The author wants to tell two stories: one about feminist history and one about her personal history. The book would be much more coherent if it only told one of these stories. In their current state, neither is quite whole.
Her mother, a prominent activist and writer, serves as a bridge between the two themes, yet her life story, though intriguing, only adds to the thematic and structural confusion. (Also, I know the personal is political but the author's juxtapositions of her Tinder dates with the biography of Emma Goldman are a bit self-aggrandizing.)
I never got a real sense of why the Bad Sex of the title was so bad (though one gets a somewhat better sense of why the good sex was good) and sometimes the historical digressions were scattered and superficial. At times, it felt like the historical aspects of the book were mere diversions, a way of fleeing a more thorough, yet painful, self-examination--a habit I can certainly relate to, but one that is lethal for a memoir like this one.
Her mother, a prominent activist and writer, serves as a bridge between the two themes, yet her life story, though intriguing, only adds to the thematic and structural confusion. (Also, I know the personal is political but the author's juxtapositions of her Tinder dates with the biography of Emma Goldman are a bit self-aggrandizing.)
I never got a real sense of why the Bad Sex of the title was so bad (though one gets a somewhat better sense of why the good sex was good) and sometimes the historical digressions were scattered and superficial. At times, it felt like the historical aspects of the book were mere diversions, a way of fleeing a more thorough, yet painful, self-examination--a habit I can certainly relate to, but one that is lethal for a memoir like this one.
December 18, 2022
She’s an excellent writer and I’d like to read more from her but this one seemed not fully cooked. It seems like the version of sexual liberation that is the foil to the author’s counter-story is a straw man version of feminism? I did appreciate her questioning everything about her marriage and her parents marriage and sex but it was frustrating to not have an anchor or a theory or a ballast in all the questioning. It’s fine to live one’s life that way but writing a book does require an arc or a narrative to guide the reader
July 6, 2022
A smart, intimate, and deeply researched exploration of desire and politics. "Bad Sex" beautifully balances the personal and the political, the individual and the collective. The personal journey made for a page-turning first read, and now I find myself returning to it, again and again, for reference.
January 31, 2023
More like a 2.5. Went into it optimistic and it made NPR’s best or 2022 list, but some parts were tough to not critique.
Decent stories and insights, but some big declarations about sexuality and its performance in society that would crumble under a 3rd wave feminism and combahee River collective analysis. Even the ability to write a book and expound on the sexcapades within are privileged. Black hetero and queer women and other women of color still exist in a world where using your sexual capital as discussed in this book ( queerness or deep heterosexuality as Nona describes) still carries with it deep social consequences.
I did find her chapter on deep heterosexuality to be very insightful and worth reading or listening to this book just to chew on it and her reflections on her mother’s reasons for partnership to be worthwhile.
Decent stories and insights, but some big declarations about sexuality and its performance in society that would crumble under a 3rd wave feminism and combahee River collective analysis. Even the ability to write a book and expound on the sexcapades within are privileged. Black hetero and queer women and other women of color still exist in a world where using your sexual capital as discussed in this book ( queerness or deep heterosexuality as Nona describes) still carries with it deep social consequences.
I did find her chapter on deep heterosexuality to be very insightful and worth reading or listening to this book just to chew on it and her reflections on her mother’s reasons for partnership to be worthwhile.
January 14, 2023
This is a rudderless mess of a book with no discernible structure or thesis. While I was interested in her discussion of second wave feminism and some of her other asides about feminist theory and history, the bulk of the book is self-indulgent navel-gazing that serves to highlight how paradoxically un-self-aware the author is. Aronowitz doesn't want to be used by men who are selfish and emotionally unavailable, but she describes tale after tale of treating people as tools on her journey of self-discovery.
Although Aronowitz is keen to interrogate her desires, she dismisses any that don't seem to her sufficiently enlightened or transgressive. She writes off monogamy as inherently toxic and clearly sees it as demanding too many sacrifices, but she praises polyamory for the fact that it requires constant work warding off jealousy. I'm curious why self-sacrifice and unfulfilled desires within monogamy is unacceptable when she is willing to doubt, brush aside, and sacrifice her own professed desire for exclusivity. Aronowitz seems thoroughly confused about what it is that she really wants or what it is that could make her happy, and her narrow vision of the possibilities is downright depressing.
One of the most interesting parts of this book is when Aronowitz admits that she wishes that her mother (a well-known, sex-positive second wave feminist) had given her more guidance when it comes to sex. The memoir portions of this book feel like an exploration of what happens when someone is tossed into life with absolutely no ethical framework and is left to founder.
Although Aronowitz is keen to interrogate her desires, she dismisses any that don't seem to her sufficiently enlightened or transgressive. She writes off monogamy as inherently toxic and clearly sees it as demanding too many sacrifices, but she praises polyamory for the fact that it requires constant work warding off jealousy. I'm curious why self-sacrifice and unfulfilled desires within monogamy is unacceptable when she is willing to doubt, brush aside, and sacrifice her own professed desire for exclusivity. Aronowitz seems thoroughly confused about what it is that she really wants or what it is that could make her happy, and her narrow vision of the possibilities is downright depressing.
One of the most interesting parts of this book is when Aronowitz admits that she wishes that her mother (a well-known, sex-positive second wave feminist) had given her more guidance when it comes to sex. The memoir portions of this book feel like an exploration of what happens when someone is tossed into life with absolutely no ethical framework and is left to founder.
September 14, 2022
Disorganized and kind of all over the place, Aronowitz gets raw and real in this memoir meets social history of sexual freedom. I appreciated her honesty and vulnerability talking about a difficult subject and insights from her own relationships. She also assesses the triumphs and flaws of contemporary feminism while exploring universal questions of desire.
Somewhat unsatisfactory like any disappointing romp, it is at times a frustrating mix of hyper personal confessions and cultural criticism.
I still enjoyed it overall — 3.5 stars rounded up.
Somewhat unsatisfactory like any disappointing romp, it is at times a frustrating mix of hyper personal confessions and cultural criticism.
I still enjoyed it overall — 3.5 stars rounded up.
August 28, 2022
This book was a confusing combination of memoir, the author’s mother’s life, second wave feminist history, and interviews.
While parts could’ve worked, albeit with MUCH smoother transitions, the author relied heavily at times on her mother and father’s story which felt… Kinda weird and intrusive given they’re both passed away and couldn’t consent to have their tumultuous relationship published. Given her mother was a fairly prominent voice in the second wave, much of the focus of the book is geared toward these dated conversations that could’ve worked if, you guessed it, they actually transitioned well into the author’s life and points of view. Though the second wave feminist history lessons become all too tiring halfway through the book.
The book also focuses solely on politics: awareness raising, rallies, protests, etc which were essential to, again, second wave feminism, but neglects to explore the effects social media and popular culture have had on our relationship to feminism and sex today.
Honestly, I didn’t even really like writing this review because I feel like a broken record and that’s what it felt like when I was reading this.
While parts could’ve worked, albeit with MUCH smoother transitions, the author relied heavily at times on her mother and father’s story which felt… Kinda weird and intrusive given they’re both passed away and couldn’t consent to have their tumultuous relationship published. Given her mother was a fairly prominent voice in the second wave, much of the focus of the book is geared toward these dated conversations that could’ve worked if, you guessed it, they actually transitioned well into the author’s life and points of view. Though the second wave feminist history lessons become all too tiring halfway through the book.
The book also focuses solely on politics: awareness raising, rallies, protests, etc which were essential to, again, second wave feminism, but neglects to explore the effects social media and popular culture have had on our relationship to feminism and sex today.
Honestly, I didn’t even really like writing this review because I feel like a broken record and that’s what it felt like when I was reading this.
November 3, 2022
This book is probably one of the best books I’ve read in 8 years. The history, entangled with Nina’s personal stories, to the rich facts and info all wrapped up in this book make it an enchantingly delightful read. I found myself reading this book at a time when I’ve been reflecting on my own desires, needs, and experiences in this world—if you want a little guidance and some major laughs along your journey I highly suggest this book be your accompaniment.
August 18, 2022
I do not recommend. I was lured by the title & cool graphic cover. What I found inside had me either cringing or marveling (at the author’s astounding self absorption). I had to Google this author and discovered she’s not even bothered to remove her husband’s name from her Wikipedia bio. Poor man. (Actually, lucky man that he’s no longer married to this woman).
I also discovered she’s the only child of two noted academics. This gave context as to her precious and self focused take on life.
I wish I’d watched a Gloria Steinem documentary instead.
I also discovered she’s the only child of two noted academics. This gave context as to her precious and self focused take on life.
I wish I’d watched a Gloria Steinem documentary instead.
December 21, 2022
the chapter about queerness was so lesbophobic and offensive. i don’t even have words. also this title / subtitle are super misleading, this is a memoir with long quips about experiences the very privileged author has never really had to contend with billed as a book about sexual revolution. only finished bc i’m trying to finish my yearly reading challenge.
September 20, 2022
extremely interesting read. a bit more biographical than I may have liked but I learned/changed my outlook on a lot of things. great read for anyone looking to broaden or shift their view about sex.
February 19, 2023
I'm learning more and more that memoirs (or quasi-memoirs) about feminist women leaving behind monogamy for the totes enlightened world of casual hookups and polyamory just to be (equally?) unhappy with those things too really annoy me. I think it's the casual, though explicit, dismissal of the works of sex-negative feminists while seemingly coming to the conclusion that so many of them have written about, yet maintaining an air of superiority about it all 👀
There were moments in this book that made me cringe. For a book that at least on the face of it is relatively woke, there were moments of unexamined misogyny that the author put forth without any amount of irony or self-awareness. For example, when she and her partner decided to try polyamory and he was checking in with her after his first hookup (as per their agreement), she said she felt jealousy (sure, that's fine). She began second guessing herself, wondering if she was like 'all other women who just wanted to suck a man into monogamy'. How can you write a book like this and nearly end it with a "Oh, nooooo, am I like *gasp* other women? Ew." Get a grip.
"Many of [the female feminist activists] had caught a distinct sense of dismissal, even contempt, from the male activists for whom they were stuffing envelopes. They often struggled to gain political clout on the left especially if they declined to trade sexual favors...Women were treated like sexual garbage cans by activist men."
"The marriages she saw around her seethed with unattractive compromises, emotional repression, and sexual boredom. Most partnerships she knew of were predicated on a sexist détente - the husband had made it clear that he would not give up certain prerogatives and the wife pretended not to hate him for it."
"...a funny reversal of the importance of sexual purity - the pursuit of sex solely to show that I was rejecting traditional expectations thereby proving the resilience of those expectation's influence."
"Women recalled chronic patronizing, compulsive interrupting and classic sexism excused with self-awareness. 'I know this is super scummy of me, but...'...A supposedly feminist guy who tramples on one's boundaries in some uncanny unexpected way. The worse thing about this phenomena, women remarked, is that it's often a general feeling and not necessarily a momentous incident and that makes it feel less real....These guys usually seem nice, reasonable, the kind of man you'd feel comfortable confronting about the very behavior he claims to denounce."
There were moments in this book that made me cringe. For a book that at least on the face of it is relatively woke, there were moments of unexamined misogyny that the author put forth without any amount of irony or self-awareness. For example, when she and her partner decided to try polyamory and he was checking in with her after his first hookup (as per their agreement), she said she felt jealousy (sure, that's fine). She began second guessing herself, wondering if she was like 'all other women who just wanted to suck a man into monogamy'. How can you write a book like this and nearly end it with a "Oh, nooooo, am I like *gasp* other women? Ew." Get a grip.
"Many of [the female feminist activists] had caught a distinct sense of dismissal, even contempt, from the male activists for whom they were stuffing envelopes. They often struggled to gain political clout on the left especially if they declined to trade sexual favors...Women were treated like sexual garbage cans by activist men."
"The marriages she saw around her seethed with unattractive compromises, emotional repression, and sexual boredom. Most partnerships she knew of were predicated on a sexist détente - the husband had made it clear that he would not give up certain prerogatives and the wife pretended not to hate him for it."
"...a funny reversal of the importance of sexual purity - the pursuit of sex solely to show that I was rejecting traditional expectations thereby proving the resilience of those expectation's influence."
"Women recalled chronic patronizing, compulsive interrupting and classic sexism excused with self-awareness. 'I know this is super scummy of me, but...'...A supposedly feminist guy who tramples on one's boundaries in some uncanny unexpected way. The worse thing about this phenomena, women remarked, is that it's often a general feeling and not necessarily a momentous incident and that makes it feel less real....These guys usually seem nice, reasonable, the kind of man you'd feel comfortable confronting about the very behavior he claims to denounce."
November 7, 2022
It gets a 4 because it accomplished (in a way i didn’t ask for) the point of book. It forced me to reflect a lot about partners, emotional vulnerability, societal complexities, stigmas, monogamy/nonmonogamy, where I’m at in life and what I want. I can’t be mad that it asked me to soul search and I complied. That being said, here are other notes I took:
* flashy/striking titles must be a 2015-present thing because this book’s title wants it to be good and it was a tad disappointing
* Balance between anecdotal and analysis + facts + historical context weighed more on the anecdotal
* Expected to be a lot more radical and revolutionary but it’s mainly just the inner workings of someone’s brain and their dating/fucking/married timeline sprinkled with literal entries from journals and diaries at various ages.
* I expected science and socialism and anti-capitalism and relationship analysis and psychology and HELP but alas I am forced to use this as a rough blueprint if I want to learn anything about myself - addendum: I did the thinking and feel good about what I’m taking away from the book, so thank you author letting me learn through your experiences that’s the point of books why am i getting upset about it
* I was originally kind of mad there was so much personal for every page or two of practical and historically contextual but I realized it needs to be that way - addendum: !!!!!!!!!!!!
* flashy/striking titles must be a 2015-present thing because this book’s title wants it to be good and it was a tad disappointing
* Balance between anecdotal and analysis + facts + historical context weighed more on the anecdotal
* Expected to be a lot more radical and revolutionary but it’s mainly just the inner workings of someone’s brain and their dating/fucking/married timeline sprinkled with literal entries from journals and diaries at various ages.
* I expected science and socialism and anti-capitalism and relationship analysis and psychology and HELP but alas I am forced to use this as a rough blueprint if I want to learn anything about myself - addendum: I did the thinking and feel good about what I’m taking away from the book, so thank you author letting me learn through your experiences that’s the point of books why am i getting upset about it
* I was originally kind of mad there was so much personal for every page or two of practical and historically contextual but I realized it needs to be that way - addendum: !!!!!!!!!!!!
November 29, 2023
The absolute slay that is digging up your dead mom's old letters from her situationships
Read
February 5, 2023Part memoir and part survey of the history of American feminism and its attitudes towards sex, Bad Sex is informative but also has an intimate, gossipy quality that makes it a page-turner. Aronowitz talks about her own experiences with divorce, polyamory, and sex, and compares them with the stories of major figures and movements in feminism. She also shares the story of her mother, pro-sex feminist Ellen Willis, and consults her writing frequently when contemplating her own dilemmas. This strategy for telling her story–intertwining her own experiences with the history of feminist thought–can at times come across as self-aggrandizing, but I think it’s fruitful and true to her given her concern with squaring her feminist political beliefs with her (hetero)sexual desires. Reading Bad Sex feels like commiserating with a smart friend–more fun and relatable than directly enlightening, but Aronowitz’s honesty inspires self-reflection and I now have a nice little reading list from all of her references.
February 2, 2023
In Bad Sex, Nona Willis Aronowitz explores the state of sex after the sexual revolution. Even during the free love movement, the state of the patriarchy meant that a lot of the sex people were having was bad!
I really loved the intersections of feminist history, scientific studies, and unflinchingly frank autobiography in this book. I think the most touching moments were when she went through her own mother's (a feminist activist in the 60s) writing after she passed from cancer. I think it really clarified how close we are to important historical feminist thinkers and events. Through linking her experiences with divorce, polyamory, and abortion, she really connected with feminist history in all of its untidiness.
I really loved the intersections of feminist history, scientific studies, and unflinchingly frank autobiography in this book. I think the most touching moments were when she went through her own mother's (a feminist activist in the 60s) writing after she passed from cancer. I think it really clarified how close we are to important historical feminist thinkers and events. Through linking her experiences with divorce, polyamory, and abortion, she really connected with feminist history in all of its untidiness.
Read
November 12, 2025‘𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘳 𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘭. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰 𝘰𝘯𝘦—𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘦𝘭𝘥 𝘧𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘫𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘰𝘯—𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘭𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘴.’
August 15, 2022
This was fantastic! Partly hyper-personal confessional memoir, partly deeply researched stocktaking of more than a century of feminist writing on women’s sexuality, Nona Willis Aronowitz’s book details her multi-year struggle to end her sexually frustrating marriage, her phase of wild promiscuity to make up for all that frustration, her ongoing experiment with non-monogamy in her current partnership (something she politically believes in but which still has the power to hurt her, and a lot), along with detours through Black and queer women’s sexuality (these parts were too short!), sexual dry spells, abortion, sex-for-hire, and much more. Throughout, the book brims with quotations from the writings of her mother, Ellen Willis (this alone makes Bad Sex worthwhile!), along with those of dozens of other feminist writers. While not everyone will find their particular ways of “doing” sex represented or prioritized—which is exactly the point of the book—I found it absolutely worth the read.
July 7, 2022
Thoroughly enjoying the journey of reading through this deeply personal and well researched chronicle about the vulnerable questions and ideas around sex and our desires that we must all wrestle with. The writing is witty, punchy and gets to the heart of the matter most satisfyingly!
July 12, 2022
I loved reading this engaging, informative, and very relatable book. It's so great and I think everyone should read it.
January 19, 2023
This book had so much potential, but it was disappointing. The writing was disjointed and quickly switched back and forth between being a literature review on second wave feminism and a memoir. The different components weren’t incorporated in a way that supported one another. It was confusing, long, and felt like it had no direction or focus. There were no takeaways either; giving a review is somewhat challenging because I’m not sure what this book really was beyond an unfocused amalgamation of information on second wave feminism and personal sex stories. Again, a book like this could be wonderful, but its execution missed the mark for me.
February 21, 2023
Very disjointed and disorganized. I liked the historical analysis, and while I find it important to use personal experience to understand broader cultural phenomena, the memoir portion of this book just irritated me. It felt like she was trying to create her own "Fear of Flying" and pat herself on the back for being so sexually liberal and open, while subtly disparaging those who choose more traditional sexual paths.
September 18, 2022
i enjoyed this a lot, smart and well-researched but still has the intimacy of a friendly conversation. much to think about 🤰🏻
May 29, 2023
bleh. nepo baby. some interesting history about free love & sex theory but just didn’t do it for me. (full transparency for my goodreads audience i could not finish the book)
April 2, 2025
It’s a hard thing to grapple with differences of ideas of monogamy and heteronormativity, especially in this current political climate. I think Aronowitz does this well enough. However, I did feel there was no organic flow to this book at all. Everything was extremely disorganized—I never knew if we were talking about the author’s relationships or that of her parents’ or that of some random person from the 1800s. This book felt more like a confessional, autobiographical piece rather than the exploration of sex and pleasure that the author had sought out to make it. I don’t think I’d recommend this book. There are other authors that do justice to these topics better.
Read
December 13, 2022the history parts were good and accurate, but holy hell do i disagree with a lot of her opinions about sex work and non monagamy
February 4, 2025
idk what i thought i was gonna get
May 8, 2023
I love a good blend of memoir + non-fiction, and this fit the bill.
August 12, 2022
I found the book relatable and informative. It tools hundreds of years of feminist theory and wove it into a deeply personal yet relatable modern day romance with romance. As prosex feminist this book hit home for me and inspired me to read more feminist works.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 237 reviews