This is an extremely “it’s chill tho” three-star review - I mostly enjoyed but just don’t think the book quite came together. A bit too much exposition about Aspermonde in the first half, not enough worldbuilding about the horse people’s empire in the second half, and it’s not that I don’t believe the romance - I actually really do! - but I would have loved to see it play out instead of seeing the characters mostly talk *about* it.
Genius romance hook imo - the set-up, that they keep trying and then thinking they’re incompatible when it’s really just all the iffy assumptions they bring to the table bc of their past bad relationships, is so so good, and the nuances and details are there. I think I just would have liked a lot more depiction of *why* they’re so into each other.
In Bastard’s Grace, even though the plot careening along I really felt Simon and Augusta’s chemistry - the small moments that developed their relationship were built directly into the plot in a way that didn’t quite happen with Nathan and Hal here.
Maybe it’s because Nathan and Hal are a lot more plot-passive than Simon and Augusta, or at least Nathan is more active in the romance arc but basically a ride along to the plot, while Hal is sort of only in the plot by virtue of his friendship with Simon - and very passive/uncommunicative in the romance arc.
I’m thinking this through as I write it, but Simon and Augusta’s romance fit really well with the plot and pace and military setting of the first book, whereas Nathan and Hal’s romance maybe just doesn’t make sense in that same context. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the best parts of their arc in the book are the parts where are less frenetic, like when they’re all at the Mosaic village at the beginning. Maybe this would have been better told as a ruby-born, Pride and Prejudice-style comedy of manners?
That said - the world of Aspermonde is still super fascinating, and based on how this book ended there’s definitely more to tell. I look forward to it!