Fittingly, Marina Hyde looks like a kind of demented Alice in Wonderland on the cover of What Just Happened: Dispatches from Turbulent Times. Those of us who notice glaring double standards a lot are bound to empathise. At any given time, there is always a certain percentage of people in powerful positions who are there by virtue some combination of privilege, connections, and clinically narcissistic levels of self-belief. The world is always a little bit upside down, in the sense of our principalities and powers. However, since 2016, it has been upside down on steroids. It seemed like David Bowie died and suddenly everything went to pot (I'm pretty sure I stole this concept from an article on Newsthump I read in 2016, just to acknowledge my sources, but it rang true). The cover of the book is brilliant, in that it illustrates how many decent folk have been feeling over the last number of years.
Marina Hyde is a brilliantly funny satirist with an ingenius ability to describe this situation. Her intimate knowledge of the British political landscape makes the commentary reach a level of granularity that I honestly found a little tough going at times, but at other times hilarious. While Brexit was a regrettable thing to us Irish, for me, following its ins and outs that closely hasn't really been a priority. To those more familiar with the subject, these portions of the book may be more rewarding. Certain other articles rang stunningly true, such as 'Britons want a bit of drama from their leaders - and Keir Starmer isn't serving it'. It seems to be a truism that the nuttier the Prime Minister is as an ideologue, the longer they last in the U.K. There is of course one exception to this: Liz Truss. Hyde's book was published before her 'tenure', but I mean, Truss does at least have the distinction of overturning this rule of thumb.
The class system has an inordinate influence on politics in the U.K. The state of affairs in which the vast majority of PMs (including Labour Party ones) have gone to Eton, then Oxford, is bizarre in the extreme to the rest of the world, but seems to be universally seen as OK across the pond. Apart from this, my main engagement with U.K. politics has been the several occasions when I've had to explain to people when they refer to my home city of Dublin as being 'part of the U.K. I haven't been to', or 'part of the U.K. I love', etc., that in fact, Dublin has been a part of the Republic of Ireland since we won the War of Independence in 1921. However, it has been fascinating to read the take of someone who contends with this system as a voter and journalist, and is also an extremely gifted satirist.
Admittedly, I rarely engage sports journalism, unless sports interacts with another issue I care about, such as violence against women. (For example, I did engage with much of the U.S. gymnastics Larry Nassar scandal at the time it was gaining a lot of coverage.) I will say, however, that Hyde's thoughts on sports are a lot more interesting to me than the average sports journalism. She points out the hubris involved in Tories targeting footballers' salaries as being problematic, which seems accurate. On the other hand, she regards the humanitarian efforts of successful footballers as providing 'life lessons' to children, but derides this 'life lessons' view of sport in her Tiger Woods commentary. This seems like a contradiction to me. It's also unclear how she can so dislike 'moralizing' about Tiger Woods' utilization of women on a massive scale, yet gets upset when cricket star Geoffrey Boycott gets a knighthood. She also has no qualms about commenting on Boris Johnson's prolific activities in relation to women (and offspring) either. I'm not sure why Woods gets a free pass here. It's possible to acknowledge that he may have faced discrimination in the golf world, without condoning this behaviour.
There's a hilarious article on the tech billionaire space race, and a lot of generally astute observations about the often phony, showy philanthropic activities of the super-rich. The article on the post office scandal is well worth a read, as it's a brilliant summing up of a really shameful series of events.
My favourite piece is 'All women know they are prey - and that no one with any authority seems to care'. If I had to re-frame it, I'd say 'Many women know they are prey, some are in denial about it, because they're dependent on those with authority for their livelihoods'. It's really about time to let the world know that many of us know this fact: we gleaned it from years of looking over our shoulders, being harassed on the streets, minimized, devalued into nothing more than objects. We develop a radar as we're out walking, by necessity. The reason I say some women are still in denial is that this became clear from the Weinstein scandal. Women assistants enabled him horribly. Female actors came out and said they were 'proud' of how 'quickly their industry' addressed the issue, when in fact, Weinstein had been abusing for many decades, and 'their industry' only addressed it when the story was well and truly broken by Ronan Farrow, Rose McGowan, and others. Prior to Weinstein, the casting couch was a running joke since the inception of Hollywood, really.
Despite a few caveats, I'd definitely recommend Marina Hyde's writing for those who feel they've been living in a sort of dystopian parallel universe for the last number of years and wish to both laugh and feel less alone in that observation.