Even though I have read all the Inspector Gamache books by Louise Penny, this is my first review of one (I think)!
I’d rate most of them in the 3-4 star range: they’re engrossing but flawed. The series’ hero worship of Gamache is always too cloying, and it starts out strong in this novel with the narrator reminding us how good, kind, and honest Gamache is. Although he’s been exposed, as the head of homicide, to the worst of humanity, the novel tells us that Gamache remains hopeful, compassionate, and relatively emotionally healthy. I should add that he remains all this even when the series has taken some of the people closest to Gamache and turned them into murderers. For me, that’s a cheap and unrealistic plot device that the series overrelies on.
I found the novel’s early mysteries quite compelling. A few things work. First, in flashback, we get Jean-Guy Beauvoir and Gamache’s origin story in a difficult case where Gamache takes a chance on Jean-Guy, who after one kind word from the head of homicide becomes a loyal lackey who obeys Gamache’s orders and turns on his own corrupt department. It’s always satisfying to learn more about the main characters’ relationships, but this also works because the case centers around two children who have been traumatized. Their behavior and Gamache and Beauvoir’s instincts about the children adds interest, suspicion, and suspense, both in the flashbacks and in the book’s present.
The book’s present is set in Three Pines following a graduation ceremony of college engineering graduates Harriet Landers and Fiona Arsenault, the now-grown female sibling from the earlier case. Fiona is staying with the Gamache family while her charismatic brother Sam, mistrusted by Gamache but not Beauvoir, is staying nearby. This part also works: Sam is clearly a malevolent force, and while we do see Fiona manipulating others, the novel sets up enough question marks that it’s unclear if Sam or Fiona is the ringleader. Gamache believes that Sam has it out for him while Beauvoir worries that Fiona is not to be trusted.
This situation sets the stage for what ends up being the main conflict in the novel. A secret room is found in Harriet’s aunt’s attic, with a huge, seemingly-historical painting that was actually painted recently and which seems to contain clues to some impending doom for Gamache. This room, the painting, and the murder case they begin to unravel through it has great potential that ultimately peters out. It doesn’t end up being a red herring so much as just a big old billboard advertising a murder plan. The Sam and Fiona conflict also gets wrapped into this convoluted murder plan that veers into unrealistic and overwrought.
I always appreciate the poetry sprinkled throughout the series, and the dialogue between our various Three Pines friends is often funny and witty. The series’ romanticism about Gamache and rural village life notwithstanding, the pleasant scenes of home, art, and love are comforting, as is— as always— Gamache coming out right in the end.
There are a few other things that I think are worth critiquing, and be warned, spoilers are coming!
First, the novel appears to be philosophically inconsistent. Unlike other detective fiction, Louise Penny’s books try to be serious about life, beauty, suffering, and death, even if they end up being terribly cavalier with the lives of side characters. With Gamache interpreting the world for us, we understand that good is powerful, that love can redeem relationships, and that trust, though often betrayed, is usually productive. Yet Gamache also says about a ten year old child that he was born bad and that circumstances made him unfixable. The novel tries to maintain through Fiona’s story that trauma produces traumatized behavior that can be redeemed, but then it also insists through Gamache’s instincts about Sam that an abused and neglected ten year old is forever someone to be suspicious of because he probably loves being bad. Fiona’s decision to betray and then to save the Gamache family is also left under-explored; she seemingly sacrifices the life she’s built for no reason other than family ties (as her father turns out to be serial killer John Fleming). The novel explains her decision to betray and then to help rescue Gamache in a throwaway line about having crossed too many lines. But murder was always the plan, and Fiona and Sam both seemed in on it. Why? And how? What were her lines?
The novel’s treatment of Fiona and Sam seems to suggest that goodness and badness are heritable and not a little bit inherent. It’s notable that the unlikable characters the series has “redeemed” like Beauvoir or Amelia Choquet become trustworthy and reliable through their adoration of Gamache. This, the novel suggests, highlights their good judgment and ultimate incorruptibility. On the contrary, anyone’s dislike of Gamache becomes a marker for evil. Sam dislikes Gamache; he’s therefore bad. Fiona seems to like Gamache, and she therefore isn’t bad even if she does bad things.
Second, the novel’s main antagonist, the serial killer Fleming, is imbued with too many contradictory characteristics. A religious fanatic, his initial imprisonment was for creating a seven-headed beast of Babylon by murdering and stitching together seven victims, yet his murder plan for Gamache is altogether areligious. That seems inconsistent. Additionally, Fleming isn’t charismatic or charming; he’s terrifying, and the novel describes both Gamache and Beauvoir’s feelings of horror in Fleming’s presence. The book characterizes Fleming, in jail, as simply radiating evil. Yet, he is able to pass for some time as the loving, kind, and wise minister of Three Pines’ local church, caring for and loving a dying wife. Nobody so much as says, “Yeah, I don’t like that guy” in the novel. He also seems to have unlimited funds and resources: How else are you able to have your entire identity in prison swapped with someone else’s so you can escape, leaving a trail of murder behind as you tie up loose ends and send your wife traveling as far as the UK to help set up your murder plan? Where does this money come from? How is he able to create totally new identities for himself? Finally, the reveal that Fleming is related to Fiona (but not Sam) doesn’t add anything to the plot or the characters, because ultimately that relationship is unrelated to the reasons he decides to target Gamache in the first place.
Third, how are there any townspeople left in Three Pines to murder or to become murderers? If I lived there, I’d try to get the Gamaches to leave because the longer they live there, the more people I know will die.