“When union is stressed to the exclusion of freedom we fall into totalitarianism; but when freedom is stressed exclusively we fall into chaos.”
At the heart of our political discord lies an obsession with rights and freedom, and while these things are undoubtedly important, overemphasizing them tends to collectively make us more selfish, intolerant, and aggressive toward each other. By focusing only on rights—with no sense of duty or obligation to others or to the country—we become belligerent and self-centered when our rights inevitably conflict with the rights of others.
But we should remember that conflict is inevitable—and welcome—in a democracy. We sacrifice getting everything we want by force by sometimes not getting what we want through peaceful debate, voting, and institutional processes. And while we may take it for granted, as Richard Haass notes, democracy is not guaranteed nor is it inevitable—it must be sustained through the collective action of a country’s citizens.
This demands, however, that we replace our obsession with individual rights with a sense of obligation to our country, to others, and to the common good. Without devaluing or ignoring our rights, we need to supplement our idea of citizenship with a sense that we are part of a collective community with a common identity—and reject and penalize the politicians that simply want to sow discord among us for short-term political gain.
To that end, Haass has developed a list of 10 obligations that can supplement the Bill of Rights, and it’s worth taking a minute to review them. They are:
1. Be informed — An informed citizenry is crucial for any democracy. Being informed means taking it upon yourself to understand the distinctions between facts, opinions, assessments, and recommendations; to understand the difference between credible and non-credible sources of information; to not be fooled into believing outlandish conspiracy theories; to demand high standards of evidence for claims; to obtain information from a wide variety of sources and media, including opposing views; and to understand the basics of how the government operates, basic political philosophy, and the history of the country. Also keep in mind that traditional news outlets—while not perfect and subject to error and bias—do employ editors and fact checkers and follow journalistic procedures that lend infinitely more credibility to their content compared to, for example, individual pundits with obvious political motivations and no means or desire for editorial review.
2. Get involved — The next logical step after being informed is getting involved in the political process by, first and foremost, voting, or by directly or indirectly supporting a political cause. In a recent survey of thirty-five democracies with successful economies, “the United States ranked thirtieth when it came to the percentage of the voting-age population that actually voted.” If you benefit from the things the government does for you—from physical defense against violence and crime to the establishment of laws and currency to the construction of roads and bridges, among much else—you owe it to at least get out and vote, irrespective of whether or not you think it makes a difference. It’s your most fundamental obligation, and in some countries, like Australia, it’s mandatory.
3. Stay open to compromise — In any democracy, rights, policy preferences, and political philosophies will conflict. There’s not only no getting around this, it’s also preferable as legitimate opposition keeps the ruling party in check and presents viable alternative solutions to political problems. The unwillingness to compromise in a democracy is a recipe for not getting anything accomplished at all—which is an all-too-familiar scenario in this age of stubbornness and dogma.
4. Remain civil — Democracies function best when its citizens and politicians engage in dispassionate and substantive debates regarding key political issues. Sticking to the facts, arguing in good faith, and attacking ideas, not people, are the ideals to strive for. It is in this area, however, that we’ve perhaps drifted farthest from the ideal—and have done a rather poor job of penalizing politicians who refuse to promote civility.
5. Reject violence — This is another one that should be obvious to any thinking person. Achieving objectives through violence is not only an illegitimate path to power, it sets up a precedent whereby violence can be reciprocated by others, which can quickly spiral out of control. Again, dispassionate and issue-focused debate through peaceful means is the ideal, even if the results are often less than satisfactory in the short-term.
6. Value norms — Norms, as opposed to laws, are not legally binding; however, they ensure smooth political and social interactions. Remaining civil is a good example; this of course isn’t and cannot be legally mandated, but we all benefit when we can focus our debates on substantive issues and refrain from personal attacks and other red herrings that seek only to distract. Another good norm to consider is the election of politicians with strong character and some signs of intelligence. Something to think about.
7. Promote the common good — When we’re singularly focused on our own individual rights, we tend to lose sight of the rights of others. Relevant to this is the “harm principle,” originally devised by John Stuart Mill, that states that we are free to live our lives as we see fit granted our actions do not inflict harm on others, or, stated another way, “your right to swing your arm ends where the other man’s nose begins.” Since we are all economically, socially, culturally, and politically interdependent, the well-being of others indirectly impacts our own well-being. So in addition to the moral reasons to care about the welfare of others, there are practical reasons to care as well. To abide by this obligation, think about how your actions may negatively impact others, and also of the ultimate implications of your actions, should others follow suit.
8. Respect government service — A common trope is that the government is the problem, not the solution. But like many other cliches, this one certainly obscures and oversimplifies reality. As Haass wrote, “Given how important government is, the reaction to imperfect government should be better government. Think about it. Government provides for our physical security against criminals, terrorists, and foreign militaries; designs and carries out our foreign policy; builds the roads, airports, bridges, rails, and tunnels that make up the country’s infrastructure; makes sure that the water we drink, food we eat, and air we breathe is safe; sets aside resources for retirees, children, the disabled, and the unemployed; operates public schools and hospitals and sets standards for private institutions; licenses those with a large impact on their fellow citizens, including doctors, lawyers, teachers, and engineers; makes sure the currency is valued and accepted; protects individuals and groups against discrimination; sets a minimum wage; oversees an economy that is the world’s largest in a manner to limit inflation; creates jobs; encourages entrepreneurs; and provides a floor for the less fortunate.” I would add that the government also protects us from the tyranny of the free market and from exploitative employers and corporations that would otherwise have free reign over our lives. While fraud, waste, and abuse does obviously occur in government, we have democratic mechanisms for rooting this out (albeit imperfectly), which, historically, have been very successful. We therefore need to drop the idea that government service is second-rate, unimportant, unnecessary, or inherently corrupt, and thus encourage the best among us (intellectually and morally) to commit to government service.
9. Support the teaching of civics — One alarming statistic is that only eight states and the District of Columbia require a full year of high school civics, while ten states require little to no education in civics at all. Colleges and universities are not much better. We need to create a more robust and shared civic education if we are to produce an informed citizenry. Not that this is easy; the framing of historical events, including their ultimate interpretations and implications, can of course be controversial. However, I like Haass’s approach in the book; he writes: “My instinct here is to suggest that the major debates, events, and developments be studied, that any single framing be avoided, and where there is disagreement, that the various perspectives be presented. One possibility is for students to be assigned a range of readings and then asked to debate competing interpretations of the past.” One thing I would add that Haass missed is that the “various perspectives” that are presented need to be respectable, credible, and recognized by professional historians. Just as we don’t teach creationism in biology class, we shouldn’t be teaching outlandish and unlikely conspiracies in history class under the guise of “competing perspectives.” In the current environment of rampant misinformation, this caveat is a critical oversight by Haass.
10. Put country first — This obligation simply states that you should value the continued functioning of American democracy over short-term political gains, your political party, or your personal interests. While it’s always nice to have your preferred candidate win elections, doing so at the risk of weakening long-established democratic norms, traditions, and trust is, frankly, acting in an un-American way.
Perhaps, at this point, you’re thinking that these obligations are naive, or that they don’t account for bad-faith actors that take advantage of the good behavior of others. You might wonder what good these obligations will be for the rest of us if a substantial subset of the country refuses to abide by them. This is a fair point, and perhaps the US is in fact beyond the point of attaining civility in the political arena.
But if we are to preserve our democracy, cultivating a sense of obligation in ourselves and others is a good place to start. It may also be the only place to start—and the only way out of the polarization that plagues us, and the obsession with rights that exacerbates it.
We should also remember that, in the end, we get the politicians we vote for—and therefore deserve. So if democracy gets destroyed in the process by politicians with poor character and little competence, then we really have no one to blame but ourselves. We need to start demanding better.