War Like a Wasp: The Lost Decade of the Forties
War Like a Wasp: The Lost Decade of the Forties
by Andrew Sinclair
Edition: Hardcover
5.0 out of 5 stars A valuable resource indeed, 3 Jan. 2017
Edit Review
Delete Review
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: War Like a Wasp: The Lost Decade of the Forties (Hardcover)
" I would rather have been in London under siege between 1940 and 1945 than anywhere else " (Author ) John Lehman said "Except perhaps Troy in the time that Homer celebrated."
I am studying World War 2 poetry so a crucial read. It's a veritable encyclopedia of the era. Probably a long decade - from the ending of the Spanish Civil War until the Festival of Britain, so effectively Spring 1939 - Spring 1951. Of course some of the individuals from this era are well studied, Francis Bacon, Dylan Thomas. Henry Moore, Laurence Olivier,for instance. Other figures who appeared at the time such as William Golding, Mervyn Peake, Keith Vaughn, John Minton, were to become famous later. A few such as Alan Ross, Vernon Scannell, Roy Fuller, were to become recognised. There are fewer references to George Orwell than one would have expected, even though his four volume collection of letters and essays were published long before this book was written.
Yes this book is vital for anyone interested in the culture of the 1940's particularly the Second World. The covers, stage, screen, sculpture, novels, and poetry- in fact page after page features contemporary quotes. The title in fact from 'Epilogue, Testimony, and Prophecy' by John Bayliss. The work of Alan Ross, John Jarmain, John Pudney, Alun Lewis, Edith Sitwell. Hamish Henderson , are all cited. A Roll call of poets, artists and writers who died in the Second World War is offered.
A huge amount of drinking and urgent living took place as the city was being bombed. The artists and writers of the time had to deal with loss , deprivation, the realisation of the concentration camps and the atomic bombs. Promiscuity was more common, Some came to terms with the horror of the time - such as Francis Bacon, others such as the New Apocalypse poets such as John Hendry and Henry Treece floundered. The rise of the BBC, documentary film making,could help fund the artist ( again I am surprised Orwell's letters were not drawn on in this respect).
This author portrays a grudging patriotism. No indication is given of any great support for the Peace Pledge Union, though Conscientious Objectors and deserters were welcomed. Other 'outsiders' such as the extrovert homosexual Quentin Crisp were also accepted.
Not indexed alas, and the references for each chapter are published at the very end of the book so difficult to trace quotes and sources at times. Also very centred round Fitzrovia- with a huge array of pub 'characters' and drinking tales are added to the book.Just a little about Scotland, Ulster and Wales but English regionalism is overlooked.
But these are minor concerns compared with the huge range of information about poetry, novels, the stage, which makes this work a valuable resource.
Comment Comment | Permalink
Next Stop Execution: The Autobiography of Oleg Gordievsky
Next Stop Execution: The Autobiography of Oleg Gordievsky
Price: £0.99
4.0 out of 5 stars A vital contribution to Cold War spy writing, 2 Jan. 2017
Edit Review
Delete Review
This review is from: Next Stop Execution: The Autobiography of Oleg Gordievsky (Kindle Edition)
A high ranking KGB officer working for Western intelligence, Oleg Gordiesvky is largely credited with warning his foreign contacts how seriously the Soviet Union were considering the prospect of a NATO nuclear first strike-allegedly misinterpreting the NATO Able Arch exercise of November 1983 as the start of actual hostilities. Also for identifying the potential of Mikhail Gorbachev as someone the West could do business with.
Not all of his claims are universally accepted- the publication of his assertion that a major Labour Party luminary was working for the KGB led to ‘The Times’ paying a hefty out of court settlement to this politician in 1995. This version of ‘Next Stop Execution’ does not repeat the claim.
Starts off with the author’s 1985 defection to the West, then presents valuable background to life in the former Soviet Union. Gordiesvky’s father was uncritical of communism, an unquestioning party man, whilst his maternal uncle was sentenced to ten years imprisonment merely for criticising collective agriculture. The Stalin regime’s moves against religion, then against Jews are covered, and the prospect of a thaw in hardline Communism between the death of Stalin and the suppression of the Hungarian revolt in 1956 make fascinating reading. Gordiesvky comes over as someone disillusioned with Communism rather than completely opposed to its idealism.
There's a fascinating section of being in the DDR in 1961 at the time that the Berlin Wall is being constructed. The author’s gradual pro-Western stance after Czechoslovakia in 1968, his time in Denmark and Britain, his comparison between Communism and the West are certainly worth reading. Gordiesvky’s depiction of Kim Philby training KGB agents in British manners is entertaining. The endless attempts by both sides in the Cold War to tentatively find , then to cultivate contacts amongst individuals disillusioned with their respective regimes, are depicted well.
Perhaps not surprisingly Gordiesvky has little time for Western radicalism, believing that the antics of the 1980’s Peace Movement were effectively benefiting the Soviet Union. He also maintains several leading British Trade Unionist and other Leftists helpful to the KGB in Britain. Whether they were ‘useful idiots’ or seriously committed to assisting the Soviets is open to question. The only time he is critical of Mrs. Thatcher is when he feels that she was trying to use his expertise to oppose German unification.
Overall we have to rely on Gordiesvsky version of events to a large extent, though his supporters will argue that his claims against journalist Richard Gott, and Trade Union leader Jack Jones have been vindicated from other source.Never sure if we can entirely trust the word of a double agent, but felt that the book is readable, in fact entertaining in places and that Gordiesvky 's motives for betraying the Soviet Union were honourable. But there's also a point where regardless of what I think as a reader, this book is a vital contribution to Cold War spy writing and needs to be read.