What do you think?
Rate this book
Communion #1
Communion
Communion is the iconic classic in which Whitley Strieber describes his 1985 close encounter experiences. This book, which fundamentally changed the way we understand close encounters and alien abductions, is presented here with a new introduction by the author.
The message of Communion, that something unknown is really happening to people but that we have not studied it enough to understand it, remains as timely now as it was in 1987 when the book was first published. And Whitley Strieber's riveting account of what he experienced, along with his relentless and expert pursuit of the reality behind the experience, is to this day the greatest such account ever published.
Do not miss this great classic and the powerful introduction that explores the situation as it stands today--even more provocative now, as official sources are admitting that UFOs are real unknowns and that they seem to have something to do with close encounters.
The message of Communion, that something unknown is really happening to people but that we have not studied it enough to understand it, remains as timely now as it was in 1987 when the book was first published. And Whitley Strieber's riveting account of what he experienced, along with his relentless and expert pursuit of the reality behind the experience, is to this day the greatest such account ever published.
Do not miss this great classic and the powerful introduction that explores the situation as it stands today--even more provocative now, as official sources are admitting that UFOs are real unknowns and that they seem to have something to do with close encounters.
330 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1987
1354 people are currently reading
10922 people want to read
About the author
Whitley Strieber
152 books1,260 followersAmerican writer best known for his novels The Wolfen,The Hunger and Warday and for Communion, a non-fiction description of his experiences with apparent alien contact. He has recently made significant advances in understanding this phenomenon, and has published his new discoveries in Solving the Communion Enigma.
Strieber also co-authored The Coming Global Superstorm with Art Bell, which inspired the blockbuster film about sudden climate change, The Day After Tomorrow.
His book The Afterlife Revolution written with his deceased wife Anne, is a record of what is considered to be one of the most powerful instances of afterlife communication ever recorded.
Strieber also co-authored The Coming Global Superstorm with Art Bell, which inspired the blockbuster film about sudden climate change, The Day After Tomorrow.
His book The Afterlife Revolution written with his deceased wife Anne, is a record of what is considered to be one of the most powerful instances of afterlife communication ever recorded.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 829 reviews
March 3, 2009
This book was stupider than a circular firing squad.
August 16, 2018
On vacation in Martha's Vineyard, this book had me screaming in my sleep, nightly. My sleeping companion disliked being awoken in this manner in the dead of night. I had to stop reading it until the vacation was over. Shall we say it touched a nerve...
November 28, 2008
I have never read an Abduction/ UFO study book before. I picked this book up at a record shop on tour on the east coast this year. It's been out for a long time and I remember what a splash it made upon its initial release. I also used to listen to Strieber's radio show in Santa Cruz on AM while delivering pizza's around town on Saturday nights. Communion was so much more than i expected. For one, Strieber is coming to this book as a writing talent so the book reads very eloquently, like that of a great fiction writer. The book is a page turner but more importantly his thinking, philosophizing and meditations on his experience take you beyond the sensational and controversial aspect of the subject matter into deeper meditations and thoughts about our psyches as individuals, as a race, as beings of history and the universe. Without giving a spoiler I will say that the most beautiful and thoughtful thing about this book and his reaction to his experiences is this: while most UFO/ abduction/ ET studies look to the skies and obsess over government cover-ups for discovery and understanding, Strieber looks more often to the uncharted hallways of the human soul. This book is at times frightening, haunting, mysterious, insightful but always deeply thoughtful and illuminated with a great sense of exploration led by his bold and creative mind. My own mind is still haunted and illuminated by many of the scenes and ideas in this book.
April 24, 2022
I read this book for two reasons. I believed I had previously read it as a teenager, and Texas Monthly published an article at some point stating that The Secret School is one of the ten best reads by a Texas author written in the last 100 years. Unfortunately The Secret School is book 4 or 5 in this series so I thought I'd read it from the start.
I quickly figured out I'd never have read this book as a teenager because it's monotonously boring. It's akin to reading the transcript of The Iran-Contra Affair or the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. A large portion of the book revolves around memories from a long time ago and the phrase, "I don't remember". The book is also subtitled "A True Story" which makes it immediately unrealistic and unbelievable when you delve into it.
The crux of the book revolves around retellings of vaguely remembered "occurrences" from years past or childhood. One "proof" comes in the form of hypnosis (completely disregarding scientific evidence which demonstrates that false "memories" are easily and routinely introduced into the minds of hypnotized subjects specifically from childhood). The author also ignores that in several of the hypnotized sessions a third person, Budd Hopkins, was allowed to sit in and question the subject. Uhhhhh...Hopkins is a painter by trade who became obsessed with UFOs and turned amateur hypnotist also writing a book about "missing time". And Hopkins goes on to ask the most leading questions. Way stupid.
Another offered "proof" is a chapter chronicling the minutes of a UFO abductees’ meeting. This again produces zero evidence and is filled with a plethora of "I don't remember's" and "I just felt that's" in reportage leaving me baffled as to how this backed the author's thesis. The discussion in the meeting ultimately revolves around the sad lives of a few isolated souls and a strange cross in "cold reading" devices such as when the question is put forth, "Why was there such a lack of personality in these visitors?" Answer: "Oh I definitely felt that. Such a lack of personality. But then again they were inundated with a kind of personality!" Uh...what? You can't have it both ways unless you're just appealing to both sides so as not to be wrong.
Even further "proof" is offered when Strieber's wife is hypnotized and basically proceeds to say she remembers very little to nothing about her husband's alleged events as well as stating she thinks he has a mental problem. I'm still not sure how this was promoted as proof. Furthermore the author finishes the book with a mind numbingly dull chapter about his belief in the special nature of "the triad". He talks about the triangle for dozens upon dozens of pages and goes into diatribes about how legitimate the tarot is and even makes some predictions (which oddly enough based on the date when the book was written have not come to pass).
All in all I'll suffice it to say I'll never read The Secret School because this book was so awful. It read vague. It read false. It tried to support the debunked and unsupportable. Frankly it just sucked.
I quickly figured out I'd never have read this book as a teenager because it's monotonously boring. It's akin to reading the transcript of The Iran-Contra Affair or the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. A large portion of the book revolves around memories from a long time ago and the phrase, "I don't remember". The book is also subtitled "A True Story" which makes it immediately unrealistic and unbelievable when you delve into it.
The crux of the book revolves around retellings of vaguely remembered "occurrences" from years past or childhood. One "proof" comes in the form of hypnosis (completely disregarding scientific evidence which demonstrates that false "memories" are easily and routinely introduced into the minds of hypnotized subjects specifically from childhood). The author also ignores that in several of the hypnotized sessions a third person, Budd Hopkins, was allowed to sit in and question the subject. Uhhhhh...Hopkins is a painter by trade who became obsessed with UFOs and turned amateur hypnotist also writing a book about "missing time". And Hopkins goes on to ask the most leading questions. Way stupid.
Another offered "proof" is a chapter chronicling the minutes of a UFO abductees’ meeting. This again produces zero evidence and is filled with a plethora of "I don't remember's" and "I just felt that's" in reportage leaving me baffled as to how this backed the author's thesis. The discussion in the meeting ultimately revolves around the sad lives of a few isolated souls and a strange cross in "cold reading" devices such as when the question is put forth, "Why was there such a lack of personality in these visitors?" Answer: "Oh I definitely felt that. Such a lack of personality. But then again they were inundated with a kind of personality!" Uh...what? You can't have it both ways unless you're just appealing to both sides so as not to be wrong.
Even further "proof" is offered when Strieber's wife is hypnotized and basically proceeds to say she remembers very little to nothing about her husband's alleged events as well as stating she thinks he has a mental problem. I'm still not sure how this was promoted as proof. Furthermore the author finishes the book with a mind numbingly dull chapter about his belief in the special nature of "the triad". He talks about the triangle for dozens upon dozens of pages and goes into diatribes about how legitimate the tarot is and even makes some predictions (which oddly enough based on the date when the book was written have not come to pass).
All in all I'll suffice it to say I'll never read The Secret School because this book was so awful. It read vague. It read false. It tried to support the debunked and unsupportable. Frankly it just sucked.
January 2, 2025
I'm always on the lookout for alien abduction horror. I love it; aliens are the only thing that truly freaks me out, and I have a lot of thoughts on this one.
Communion began on a high note, recounting a terrifying tale of isolation, home invasion, and abduction. Unfortunately, by the half way mark it started growing repetitive, dragging on and on, no longer offering any sort of sinister enjoyment.
Communion is marketed as a true story. I promise I would LOVE to believe in aliens, but I don't. And this long-winded reprisal of the same story we've heard countless times certainly didn't convert me.
That should have been perfectly fine, though. I was reading for the horror, not the truth. But the horror ended falling flat too.
On a positive note the beginning really was fantastic, and reading it made me restart watching the X-files...which is always enjoyable.
Communion began on a high note, recounting a terrifying tale of isolation, home invasion, and abduction. Unfortunately, by the half way mark it started growing repetitive, dragging on and on, no longer offering any sort of sinister enjoyment.
Communion is marketed as a true story. I promise I would LOVE to believe in aliens, but I don't. And this long-winded reprisal of the same story we've heard countless times certainly didn't convert me.
That should have been perfectly fine, though. I was reading for the horror, not the truth. But the horror ended falling flat too.
On a positive note the beginning really was fantastic, and reading it made me restart watching the X-files...which is always enjoyable.
August 26, 2012
Mike Miley told me of this book when it came out in 1987. I was suspicious, having known its author as the source of The Hunger and Wolfen, two decent horror movies based on novels by him. This skepticism was reinforced shortly thereafter by the reading of a review of the book by science fiction writer Samuel Delany in The Nation. Delany, at some length and with considerable heat, accused Strieber of fraud. In consequence, I began to look for and read Strieber's novels, planning to obtain Communion after getting a sense of the workings of his imagination.
Now, having read at least five of Streiber's science fiction and horror books, now, many years later, I have finally obtained a copy of Communion thanks to the generosity of my stepbrother's girlfriend.
It's better than the movie in which Streiber was played by Christopher Walken. It's broader than I expected, personal accounts being supplemented by some overview of the history of the UFO abduction phenomenon. It's less opinionated than I imagined. The author subscribes to no particular interpretation of what has been happening to him or of what has been behind it.
Is it factual? This I do not know. Streiber is a good enough fiction writer to fake it convincingly. On video and audio he comes across as sincere and in earnest. I am, further, prone to believe others.
All this notwithstanding, Communion well represents much of the so-called abduction phenomenon and I intend to proceed to the second volume of these memoirs, Transformation.
Now, having read at least five of Streiber's science fiction and horror books, now, many years later, I have finally obtained a copy of Communion thanks to the generosity of my stepbrother's girlfriend.
It's better than the movie in which Streiber was played by Christopher Walken. It's broader than I expected, personal accounts being supplemented by some overview of the history of the UFO abduction phenomenon. It's less opinionated than I imagined. The author subscribes to no particular interpretation of what has been happening to him or of what has been behind it.
Is it factual? This I do not know. Streiber is a good enough fiction writer to fake it convincingly. On video and audio he comes across as sincere and in earnest. I am, further, prone to believe others.
All this notwithstanding, Communion well represents much of the so-called abduction phenomenon and I intend to proceed to the second volume of these memoirs, Transformation.
January 26, 2012
When my nephew was about ten years old, he insists he was visited by aliens. He says he woke up in the middle of the night with a bright orb coming through his bedroom window. Then nothing. The next thing he remembers is being in his parents bedroom trying to wake them up to warn them - but nothing would wake them. Next morning, the foot of his bed and bedroom floor were drenched. His mother asked him for an explanation and he told her the events of the previous night. Naturally she didn't believe him and thought he'd been up to mischief. That evening, the local paper, had headlines of strange sightings and lights in the night sky. The location given, was directly over my nephew's neighborhood.
He still insists to this day, as a 40+ father of three children, that something odd happened that night.
So when I read Communion, I did so with an open mind and a small vested interest. I now have no doubts that we are not alone.
Whitley Streiber insists that everything in this book actually happened. Even the biggest doubting Thomas would be hard pushed to explain some of Streiber's experiences - without calling him an out & out liar.
Even for non-believers, if you simply treat this as a good read, it is an incredible, powerful and sometimes uncomfortable story.
"Communion is one man's gripping story of repeated contact with apparent aliens or visitors. Assuming that these events are factual - and I think they are - then we human beings must begin a re-evaluation of ourselves and our place in the universe." Dr M.Bruce Maccabee. US Navy research physicist.
"Communion raises more questions for science than a galaxy full of black holes. It is beautifully written and one hell of a good read: a moving and courageous book." Dr John Gliedman: Research psychologist.
"Communion is a brilliant compelling and provcative work." Dr David Webb. Chairman Of Space Studies: University Of Dakota.
He still insists to this day, as a 40+ father of three children, that something odd happened that night.
So when I read Communion, I did so with an open mind and a small vested interest. I now have no doubts that we are not alone.
Whitley Streiber insists that everything in this book actually happened. Even the biggest doubting Thomas would be hard pushed to explain some of Streiber's experiences - without calling him an out & out liar.
Even for non-believers, if you simply treat this as a good read, it is an incredible, powerful and sometimes uncomfortable story.
"Communion is one man's gripping story of repeated contact with apparent aliens or visitors. Assuming that these events are factual - and I think they are - then we human beings must begin a re-evaluation of ourselves and our place in the universe." Dr M.Bruce Maccabee. US Navy research physicist.
"Communion raises more questions for science than a galaxy full of black holes. It is beautifully written and one hell of a good read: a moving and courageous book." Dr John Gliedman: Research psychologist.
"Communion is a brilliant compelling and provcative work." Dr David Webb. Chairman Of Space Studies: University Of Dakota.
January 22, 2009
I am almost tired of people reading this book expecting it to be 100% biographical in nature. Streiber himself has been clear that he is not totaly sure what it is really about. I always read it taking the visitors out of the equation and looking at Streibers subsequent examination of himself, and his life.
I also believe it is wrong for anyone to claim it to be total B.S., as we have to face the one fact; we can not prove it to be true or false. This is the underlining problem for the hardcore believers, as well as the hardcore skeptics. It is no more believable than the Bible. Either you believe or you don't.
I also believe it is wrong for anyone to claim it to be total B.S., as we have to face the one fact; we can not prove it to be true or false. This is the underlining problem for the hardcore believers, as well as the hardcore skeptics. It is no more believable than the Bible. Either you believe or you don't.
May 19, 2021
Very few books scare me. This was one of them. I'm "agnostic" when it comes to believing in aliens, but I love entertaining the idea. This book had me questioning everything from childhood memories to a "sighting" I experienced when I was younger. I'm still on the fence, but as Mulder so passionately declared, "I want to believe."
August 28, 2012
Did aliens abduct Whitley Streiber in 1984? Are the "visitors" as he calls them from another planet, another dimension, from somewhere deep in the human psyche? And why are they here? These are the questions Streiber raises in his book, probably the all-time definitive book about alien abduction. Interesting though the questions may be, unfortunately he doesn't provide many answers.
The questions you will be asking yourself while reading it are more along the lines of : Is this guy totally crazy or a gigantic liar? (It does seem a big coincidence that he happened to write horror novels before this book, one about werewolves, and one about vampires . . . then aliens, hmm.)
I really enjoyed the book at first. It starts off with Whitley's two abduction stories. These stories are really spooky, I read this part late at night and then didn't want to turn the lights off. One story involves vague memories of a night when a crystal fire hovers over his house. The other is a full on aliens abduct the author, take him to a ufo and he gets probed and the little grey men inject something up his nose etc. The dreamlike way it all unfolds makes the visitors much more nightmarish and believable than a more straight forward account would be.
At this point you start to ask: what exactly is going on here, lies or madness, something actually weird, or a mixture. it's the tension between these explanations that keeps you turning the pages. The final effect is a puzzle, it leaves you unable to decide what category to place the book in: fiction or an honest but misled attempt at fact? And yet this parallax is actually strong enough to suggest that something unusual is in fact at the root of his stories. (The effect is similar to reading the Teachings of Don Juan.)
However the book gets more and more unbelievable as it goes on however. As the book progresses the author goes under hypnosis to recover memories of his abduction and begins to remember more and more supposed encounters with the aliens, which get weirder and weirder. Pretty soon you can't even keep track of the dozens and dozens of supposed encounters. His chronology leaps all over the place, and sometimes he casually mentions incredible stories in a off-hand manner, as stuff that he suddenly recalls. His attempts at theory about what is in fact going on behind the scenes range from the very insightful and creative ( I especially liked the theory that UFOs are contacting humanity across all eras of time simultaneously, which explains why they can have been around for thousands of years and still be inquisitive about humanity) to an incredibly stupid and treacly epilogue where Whitley's attempts at poetic philosophizing are especially grating and facile.
Bottom line: if you're interested in this sort of stuff this is one of the all-time classics on the subject. Otherwise, I'd skip this one, It is a mixed bag
The questions you will be asking yourself while reading it are more along the lines of : Is this guy totally crazy or a gigantic liar? (It does seem a big coincidence that he happened to write horror novels before this book, one about werewolves, and one about vampires . . . then aliens, hmm.)
I really enjoyed the book at first. It starts off with Whitley's two abduction stories. These stories are really spooky, I read this part late at night and then didn't want to turn the lights off. One story involves vague memories of a night when a crystal fire hovers over his house. The other is a full on aliens abduct the author, take him to a ufo and he gets probed and the little grey men inject something up his nose etc. The dreamlike way it all unfolds makes the visitors much more nightmarish and believable than a more straight forward account would be.
At this point you start to ask: what exactly is going on here, lies or madness, something actually weird, or a mixture. it's the tension between these explanations that keeps you turning the pages. The final effect is a puzzle, it leaves you unable to decide what category to place the book in: fiction or an honest but misled attempt at fact? And yet this parallax is actually strong enough to suggest that something unusual is in fact at the root of his stories. (The effect is similar to reading the Teachings of Don Juan.)
However the book gets more and more unbelievable as it goes on however. As the book progresses the author goes under hypnosis to recover memories of his abduction and begins to remember more and more supposed encounters with the aliens, which get weirder and weirder. Pretty soon you can't even keep track of the dozens and dozens of supposed encounters. His chronology leaps all over the place, and sometimes he casually mentions incredible stories in a off-hand manner, as stuff that he suddenly recalls. His attempts at theory about what is in fact going on behind the scenes range from the very insightful and creative ( I especially liked the theory that UFOs are contacting humanity across all eras of time simultaneously, which explains why they can have been around for thousands of years and still be inquisitive about humanity) to an incredibly stupid and treacly epilogue where Whitley's attempts at poetic philosophizing are especially grating and facile.
Bottom line: if you're interested in this sort of stuff this is one of the all-time classics on the subject. Otherwise, I'd skip this one, It is a mixed bag
April 16, 2013
Having personally witnessed 3 UFO sightings from the mid 60's, to the last one in August of 1970, his story both reminds me (and frightens me) of how close I was to my 3rd UFO sighting!
Mom and I both saw the first 2 UFO's while dad was driving. I spotted them and then asked mom if she saw it too, and she did.(The first one was near the cliffs (actually hiding above them at times) outside of Warm Springs, Oregon on a clear blue sky day. It was silver and reflecting the sun. We could see it very clearly. The 2nd one was hovering quite low near the water next to Highway 30 between Linton and Portland, Oregon at night. The radio station announced he was getting quite a few calls reporting the same sighting we saw!)
The 3rd (and thankfully the last) UFO that I saw hovered above my head (slightly above the 40' oak tree that I was standing next too! Seconds before that I had been hiding behind the trunk from dad. My brother and I were playing hide-and-seek and dad was supposed to come out to find us...) I had nightmares about it for years... I don't think I ever played outside in the dark much after that!!
Then around 1990, I happened to work with a young girl who was actually living in the same house (104 May Ave.) that I did when I saw the 3rd UFO! One day I got the courage to tell her what I had seen when I lived there. I did not expect to hear the response she gave me! She simply said "So did I!" At first I didn't believe her, but she then explained that her dad saw it first while getting ready for work at 5am. He saw it through the kitchen window that faces the back yard and the old oak tree. He woke his wife and daughter and all 3 of them saw it, so in a way I finally had a witness. The oak tree is no longer there, and the property behind the house that used to be the baseball field for the old McBride School, is now home to storage units. The oak tree used to be at the back of the field.
I've always wondered why the UFO returned to the same spot, just like they did to this author! This book reminds me of feeling like "they" had been following me for some reason!! No wonder I had nightmares back then, but for some reason I am fascinated by the experiences of others.
Mom and I both saw the first 2 UFO's while dad was driving. I spotted them and then asked mom if she saw it too, and she did.(The first one was near the cliffs (actually hiding above them at times) outside of Warm Springs, Oregon on a clear blue sky day. It was silver and reflecting the sun. We could see it very clearly. The 2nd one was hovering quite low near the water next to Highway 30 between Linton and Portland, Oregon at night. The radio station announced he was getting quite a few calls reporting the same sighting we saw!)
The 3rd (and thankfully the last) UFO that I saw hovered above my head (slightly above the 40' oak tree that I was standing next too! Seconds before that I had been hiding behind the trunk from dad. My brother and I were playing hide-and-seek and dad was supposed to come out to find us...) I had nightmares about it for years... I don't think I ever played outside in the dark much after that!!
Then around 1990, I happened to work with a young girl who was actually living in the same house (104 May Ave.) that I did when I saw the 3rd UFO! One day I got the courage to tell her what I had seen when I lived there. I did not expect to hear the response she gave me! She simply said "So did I!" At first I didn't believe her, but she then explained that her dad saw it first while getting ready for work at 5am. He saw it through the kitchen window that faces the back yard and the old oak tree. He woke his wife and daughter and all 3 of them saw it, so in a way I finally had a witness. The oak tree is no longer there, and the property behind the house that used to be the baseball field for the old McBride School, is now home to storage units. The oak tree used to be at the back of the field.
I've always wondered why the UFO returned to the same spot, just like they did to this author! This book reminds me of feeling like "they" had been following me for some reason!! No wonder I had nightmares back then, but for some reason I am fascinated by the experiences of others.
July 20, 2021
As a young teenager, I always remember this as the first book I ever managed to finish. For that alone it deserves 5 stars. A bold title nevertheless and I question how true is 'true'?
November 14, 2012
Sometimes you read a book that changes your life. Was it a change for the better or worse I almost hear you cry?
I don't know
I read this book many years ago at the tender age of 21. The thing that initially drew me to it was the cover art...the typical alien head...
I devour the book in a couple of days and during the read I got what can only be described as a Flashback
Suddenly I remembered being with a pal at age 11ish standing on an Orkney hilltop in the night watching huge glowing red orbs passing silently over the town below
This flipped me out
I became paranoid as more memories of other events filtered into my consciousness
I ended up reading every UFO book I could track down in an attempt to read up on any reports of glowing red balls
It took me ten years to sleep with the light out
Are there aliens? I don't know...is there a coverup/ a pattern of ridicule or denial - YES
I think you should read this book with a hefty pinch o salt and an equally open mind...maybe you will remember something too
I don't know
I read this book many years ago at the tender age of 21. The thing that initially drew me to it was the cover art...the typical alien head...
I devour the book in a couple of days and during the read I got what can only be described as a Flashback
Suddenly I remembered being with a pal at age 11ish standing on an Orkney hilltop in the night watching huge glowing red orbs passing silently over the town below
This flipped me out
I became paranoid as more memories of other events filtered into my consciousness
I ended up reading every UFO book I could track down in an attempt to read up on any reports of glowing red balls
It took me ten years to sleep with the light out
Are there aliens? I don't know...is there a coverup/ a pattern of ridicule or denial - YES
I think you should read this book with a hefty pinch o salt and an equally open mind...maybe you will remember something too
April 6, 2016
Βαθμολογία: 7/10
Τρίτο βιβλίο του Γουίτλι Στρίμπερ που διαβάζω, μετά το καλογραμμένο και άκρως ενδιαφέρον "Οι λυκάνθρωποι" και το ψυχαγωγικό μεν αλλά προβληματικό "2012: Ο πόλεμος για τις ψυχές", τα οποία διάβασα το 2014. Τα δυο προηγούμενα βιβλία ήταν μυθιστορήματα, αυτό που μόλις τελείωσα υποτίθεται ότι είναι αληθινή ιστορία, με τον συγγραφέα να περιγράφει τις εμπειρίες του από τις επαφές του με άγνωστα και παράξενα όντα, εξωγήινης προέλευσης. Ο Στρίμπερ αναλύει όλες τις παράξενες συναντήσεις του με το Άγνωστο, με περίεργα πλάσματα αλλά και αντικείμενα, συνομιλεί με ειδικούς και ψυχιάτρους για το θέμα αυτό, μέσω ύπνωσης επιστρέφει στο παρελθόν και θυμάται γεγονότα, ενώ παράλληλα προσπαθεί να κατανοήσει τις επαφές του με τα άγνωστα όντα και τους λόγους για τους οποίους τον πλησίασαν.
Αμφιβάλλω πολύ αν όλα όσα περιγράφει ο Στρίμπερ είναι αληθινά, αν και προσωπικά είμαι αρκετά δεκτικός ως προς την ύπαρξη των εξωγήινων και την πιθανή επαφή τους με κάποιους ανθρώπους. Πάντως όσα περιγράφονται έχουν το ενδιαφέρον τους, είτε είναι πραγματικά είτε όχι, κάποιες περιγραφές των "εμπειριών" του συγγραφέα μου πρόσφεραν αρκετές ανατριχίλες. Όμως κουράστηκα λιγάκι από την μονοτονία της όλης ιστορίας, τα μπρος πίσω στον χρόνο και ορισμένες μπερδεμένες καταστάσεις. Και ειδικά προς το τέλος με την όλη "τριαδικότητα", τις διάφορες αναφορές και τις φιλοσοφικές του προσπάθειες, μ'έκανε να βαρεθώ σε μεγάλο βαθμό. Μάλιστα κάποιες σελίδες τις ξεπέταξα τσάκα τσάκα, διαβάζοντάς τες διαγωνίως. Η γραφή δεν ξεχωρίζει ιδιαίτερα, σίγουρα είναι ευκολοδιάβαστη, αλλά μου φάνηκε κάπως επίπεδη και με έλλειψη συναισθημάτων.
Σαν βιβλίο έχει το ενδιαφέρον του, αν δεν πιστεύετε ότι οι εμπειρίες που περιγράφει ο Στρίμπερ είναι αληθινές, μπορείτε κάλλιστα να το διαβάσετε σαν ένα μυθιστόρημα του Φανταστικού, με στοιχεία τρόμου και επιστημονικής φαντασίας. Να σας πω την αλήθεια, εγώ ως τέτοιο το διάβασα. Όσον αφορά τον συγγραφέα, έχει γράψει αρκετά ενδιαφέροντα μυθιστορήματα τρόμου και επιστημονικής φαντασίας (εκτός από αυτά που διάβασα, υπάρχουν και τα The Hunger, Warday, The Grays, Nature's End, Majestic και άλλα πολλά) και είναι κρίμα που κάποια από αυτά δεν έχουν μεταφραστεί στα ελληνικά.
Τρίτο βιβλίο του Γουίτλι Στρίμπερ που διαβάζω, μετά το καλογραμμένο και άκρως ενδιαφέρον "Οι λυκάνθρωποι" και το ψυχαγωγικό μεν αλλά προβληματικό "2012: Ο πόλεμος για τις ψυχές", τα οποία διάβασα το 2014. Τα δυο προηγούμενα βιβλία ήταν μυθιστορήματα, αυτό που μόλις τελείωσα υποτίθεται ότι είναι αληθινή ιστορία, με τον συγγραφέα να περιγράφει τις εμπειρίες του από τις επαφές του με άγνωστα και παράξενα όντα, εξωγήινης προέλευσης. Ο Στρίμπερ αναλύει όλες τις παράξενες συναντήσεις του με το Άγνωστο, με περίεργα πλάσματα αλλά και αντικείμενα, συνομιλεί με ειδικούς και ψυχιάτρους για το θέμα αυτό, μέσω ύπνωσης επιστρέφει στο παρελθόν και θυμάται γεγονότα, ενώ παράλληλα προσπαθεί να κατανοήσει τις επαφές του με τα άγνωστα όντα και τους λόγους για τους οποίους τον πλησίασαν.
Αμφιβάλλω πολύ αν όλα όσα περιγράφει ο Στρίμπερ είναι αληθινά, αν και προσωπικά είμαι αρκετά δεκτικός ως προς την ύπαρξη των εξωγήινων και την πιθανή επαφή τους με κάποιους ανθρώπους. Πάντως όσα περιγράφονται έχουν το ενδιαφέρον τους, είτε είναι πραγματικά είτε όχι, κάποιες περιγραφές των "εμπειριών" του συγγραφέα μου πρόσφεραν αρκετές ανατριχίλες. Όμως κουράστηκα λιγάκι από την μονοτονία της όλης ιστορίας, τα μπρος πίσω στον χρόνο και ορισμένες μπερδεμένες καταστάσεις. Και ειδικά προς το τέλος με την όλη "τριαδικότητα", τις διάφορες αναφορές και τις φιλοσοφικές του προσπάθειες, μ'έκανε να βαρεθώ σε μεγάλο βαθμό. Μάλιστα κάποιες σελίδες τις ξεπέταξα τσάκα τσάκα, διαβάζοντάς τες διαγωνίως. Η γραφή δεν ξεχωρίζει ιδιαίτερα, σίγουρα είναι ευκολοδιάβαστη, αλλά μου φάνηκε κάπως επίπεδη και με έλλειψη συναισθημάτων.
Σαν βιβλίο έχει το ενδιαφέρον του, αν δεν πιστεύετε ότι οι εμπειρίες που περιγράφει ο Στρίμπερ είναι αληθινές, μπορείτε κάλλιστα να το διαβάσετε σαν ένα μυθιστόρημα του Φανταστικού, με στοιχεία τρόμου και επιστημονικής φαντασίας. Να σας πω την αλήθεια, εγώ ως τέτοιο το διάβασα. Όσον αφορά τον συγγραφέα, έχει γράψει αρκετά ενδιαφέροντα μυθιστορήματα τρόμου και επιστημονικής φαντασίας (εκτός από αυτά που διάβασα, υπάρχουν και τα The Hunger, Warday, The Grays, Nature's End, Majestic και άλλα πολλά) και είναι κρίμα που κάποια από αυτά δεν έχουν μεταφραστεί στα ελληνικά.
December 24, 2013
Honestly, I don't do the whole aliens thing at all, but the cover of this book used to freak me out as a kid (and a bit residually as an adult) so I decided to see what was inside.
Alright, about fifty pages into this book I started to realize what direction this book was heading in. The author clearly believed that what he experienced was real and from there made a concerted effort to present facts and statements to support his belief rather than to draw objective conclusions, which is precisely what he accused skeptics of doing. He also offered several different possibilities for his experiences, but when it came down to it...
I liked reading this twenty-six years after it was published, because it makes things like the "visitors" trying to help mankind because of the ozone hole a little bit discredited. (No, it's not still growing, it's actually shrinking.) And everyone is so concerned that the near future will be catastrophic. Actually, that leads into my theory about why the visitors are characterized the way they are. The way that they have a "hive mind" and the similar jumpsuits, and even the asiatic looks of the visitors can all seem to be projected fears of communism during the Cold War. More telling is the fact that most sightings and experiences have occurred at the rise of communism. I can understand how certain sensitive people, through some set of circumstances, could possibly see visitors that are an actualized form of their anxieties and hopes. (Don't know how, but for some reason it makes a whole more sense than aliens.)
Alright, about fifty pages into this book I started to realize what direction this book was heading in. The author clearly believed that what he experienced was real and from there made a concerted effort to present facts and statements to support his belief rather than to draw objective conclusions, which is precisely what he accused skeptics of doing. He also offered several different possibilities for his experiences, but when it came down to it...
I liked reading this twenty-six years after it was published, because it makes things like the "visitors" trying to help mankind because of the ozone hole a little bit discredited. (No, it's not still growing, it's actually shrinking.) And everyone is so concerned that the near future will be catastrophic. Actually, that leads into my theory about why the visitors are characterized the way they are. The way that they have a "hive mind" and the similar jumpsuits, and even the asiatic looks of the visitors can all seem to be projected fears of communism during the Cold War. More telling is the fact that most sightings and experiences have occurred at the rise of communism. I can understand how certain sensitive people, through some set of circumstances, could possibly see visitors that are an actualized form of their anxieties and hopes. (Don't know how, but for some reason it makes a whole more sense than aliens.)
Read
March 29, 2021I read this many years ago along with Fire in the Sky. I wanted to dive back in and see if it still held the same hold on me as it did all those years ago.
Tough one to rate as it seems to meander back and forth between a non-fiction account with heavy fictionalized sections.
Ultimately, I think this one will work for each reader differently based on their personal beliefs on if we're alone in the Universe or not.
Tough one to rate as it seems to meander back and forth between a non-fiction account with heavy fictionalized sections.
Ultimately, I think this one will work for each reader differently based on their personal beliefs on if we're alone in the Universe or not.
July 16, 2008
This book totally freaked me out, and I couldn't finish it. When I read it I was living in Austin which is where Whitley Streiber was living when he claims these events happened. I woke up in the middle of the night for weeks seeing aliens in my bedroom.
October 18, 2010
Communion played a role in my life even before I read it. I have a vivid memory of a group of spandex-clad women gathered in my mother’s aerobics class, discussing Whitley Strieber’s supposed true story of alien abduction. One woman related some especially dreadful sequences in between sips from a Who Framed Roger Rabbit cup. After overhearing this, my seven-year-old brain seethed with nightmares for months afterward. Later on, I happened upon a paperback copy of the book among my dad’s collection. The alien on the cover was so frightening to me that I’d take occasional peeks at it just to give myself a chill.
With these vivid memories intact, I had high expectations for Communion. Instead, what I got was a muddle. While the subject matter is of course impossible to quantify, the book contains much material that is downright silly. Mr. Strieber’s repressed memories are drawn out with the help of hypnosis, and his sessions are transcribed throughout several chapters. Frankly, I’m skeptical about hypnosis, and when a book relies so heavily upon it, I feel a little cheated. Strieber also includes a very trying, extended hypnosis interview with his wife—whose experiences are mainly peripheral to the main story—and it is an absolute chore to read. Think page after page of a person contradicting herself, saying she can’t remember, and going off on unrelated tangents. And transcriptions of interviews with the author’s young son don’t really ring true; they do not seem to follow the way a child would normally talk.
The author’s writing style could be too self-referential, as he was constantly name-dropping the titles of other books he’s written and assuring readers of his sanity. Why? Why not present the story as he believes it to be, and let readers make up their own minds? Telling the reader over and over you’re not crazy and you’ve led a successful life is just distracting. Another confusing aspect of Communion is its apparent contradictions. In the beginning of the book the author seemed to act like his encounter with aliens was a new occurrence with no precedent, but later we learn he has had a string of extreme supernatural experiences throughout his life.
As I read this tale of a helpless, terrified being taken against his will from his home and studied by strange creatures whose motives are a mystery to him, I couldn’t help but think about the situation of nonhuman animals, especially those held in laboratories. Strieber, to his credit, also realized this parallel early on. To me, the alien sequences in the book could have just as easily been drawn from a laboratory primate’s experience as a haunted man’s.
On another note, the final chapter is one of the corniest, most starry-eyed assemblages of dreck I have ever read. It reminds me of a more literate version of something Sylvia Browne would write. The book would have been much better off had it simply omitted the ridiculous and pointless last chapter.
There are many fascinating books out there on the subject of the unknown. Unfortunately, this isn’t one of them.
With these vivid memories intact, I had high expectations for Communion. Instead, what I got was a muddle. While the subject matter is of course impossible to quantify, the book contains much material that is downright silly. Mr. Strieber’s repressed memories are drawn out with the help of hypnosis, and his sessions are transcribed throughout several chapters. Frankly, I’m skeptical about hypnosis, and when a book relies so heavily upon it, I feel a little cheated. Strieber also includes a very trying, extended hypnosis interview with his wife—whose experiences are mainly peripheral to the main story—and it is an absolute chore to read. Think page after page of a person contradicting herself, saying she can’t remember, and going off on unrelated tangents. And transcriptions of interviews with the author’s young son don’t really ring true; they do not seem to follow the way a child would normally talk.
The author’s writing style could be too self-referential, as he was constantly name-dropping the titles of other books he’s written and assuring readers of his sanity. Why? Why not present the story as he believes it to be, and let readers make up their own minds? Telling the reader over and over you’re not crazy and you’ve led a successful life is just distracting. Another confusing aspect of Communion is its apparent contradictions. In the beginning of the book the author seemed to act like his encounter with aliens was a new occurrence with no precedent, but later we learn he has had a string of extreme supernatural experiences throughout his life.
As I read this tale of a helpless, terrified being taken against his will from his home and studied by strange creatures whose motives are a mystery to him, I couldn’t help but think about the situation of nonhuman animals, especially those held in laboratories. Strieber, to his credit, also realized this parallel early on. To me, the alien sequences in the book could have just as easily been drawn from a laboratory primate’s experience as a haunted man’s.
On another note, the final chapter is one of the corniest, most starry-eyed assemblages of dreck I have ever read. It reminds me of a more literate version of something Sylvia Browne would write. The book would have been much better off had it simply omitted the ridiculous and pointless last chapter.
There are many fascinating books out there on the subject of the unknown. Unfortunately, this isn’t one of them.
March 30, 2022
Parts of this book are some of the most terrifying stuff I've ever read.
Parts of this book are some of the most boring stuff I've ever read.
The first 90 or so pages are so unsettling that when you get past that bit it feels a bit underwhelming and you have to wade through the next 100 pages before it gets really interesting again. That said, I believe and I do think that after you've finished this book, thinking about it is even more terrifying than reading it.
Parts of this book are some of the most boring stuff I've ever read.
The first 90 or so pages are so unsettling that when you get past that bit it feels a bit underwhelming and you have to wade through the next 100 pages before it gets really interesting again. That said, I believe and I do think that after you've finished this book, thinking about it is even more terrifying than reading it.
September 12, 2017
Overall I thought this was a compelling read. If you take what he writes to be true, then this is a pretty scary book. After reading his descriptions, hypnosis transcripts and polygraph results, I'm definitely convinced that something happened to him and his family.
Where the book lost me was in the odd discussions of ancient gods and reports of "visitors" throughout the ages, and some of the claims from the colloquy of abductees. I can pretty much believe that some people have been visited/abducted by alien beings (or those from another dimension). But some of these claims... No. It got kind of ridiculous at the end of this book. I did enjoy the Epilogue, though.
Where the book lost me was in the odd discussions of ancient gods and reports of "visitors" throughout the ages, and some of the claims from the colloquy of abductees. I can pretty much believe that some people have been visited/abducted by alien beings (or those from another dimension). But some of these claims... No. It got kind of ridiculous at the end of this book. I did enjoy the Epilogue, though.
January 20, 2016
Regardless of your personal beliefs about aliens, this book is well written, well paced and quite riveting. Spooky.
Read
February 28, 2019Couldn't finish it. Life is too short.
December 1, 2024
I'm on an alien kick lately. Unfortunately, not all genre classics/fauxtobiographies are created equal. At least we'll always have The X-Files
June 3, 2023
I give this book one star because I really did find it to be terrible. However, I am thankful for having read it due to its cultural significance. I have always found the UFO community to be more interesting than the thought of UFOs themselves. I do not mean to say that I am laughing at people who feel they have had unexplainable experiences. But rather, the ever expanding mythology that's agreed upon by the participants. Every phase of the bizarre has to continue expanding or people will lose interest. So overtime, all new claims BUILD on the mythology of what is known from previous claims in the community.
What makes this book a one star for me, is the hypnosis sessions. They were a chore to read and the author assigns meaning and significance to events that seem rather mundane, and then when under hypnosis became evidence of the visitor experience. The more I study the author, the more convinced I am that he will say anything for a dollar (including co-authoring a book with his dead wife from beyond the grave).
So much of the testimony relies on the work of Budd Hopkins, a known Ufologist who wrote "Missing time" years before Communion. Almost all of the subjects the man works with have the same story, but in my opinion if you're seeking out this specific person to perform your session, you already have some awareness of the road you are about to travel.
Budd Hopkins name is mentioned constantly, he really is the epicenter of this entire UFO scene from what I can tell, and I don't find him any more credible then Whitley Strieber. If I sold books on big foot, I'd be better off trying to convince people of big foots reality and I think that's what is going on here.
I want to believe, and I will go as far as admitting that visitation from other worlds is possible. But if the aliens are coming here to do what's described throughout this book, then they are wasting all of our time.
Where this book shines, is when the author provides hypothesis as why and what these beings are. But he goes on tangents and tries to qualify his ideas with anecdotal claims from various witnesses and it's extremely repetitive.
With that being said, if you're just gonna make this stuff up, at least make it entertaining. Instead we get an hour-long chapter about the historical significance of triangles in mythology.
The main issue with these fun to think about but hard to believe phenomenon, is we like to use the lack of evidence as a form of evidence. I don't remember putting my bowl of cereal in the refrigerator after I made it instead of eating it. Must be aliens! But it's this very thing that has given these modern mythological stories such staying power. Because above all it's fun to ask "what if?"
(My video review)
https://youtu.be/MPskEPxUaEI
What makes this book a one star for me, is the hypnosis sessions. They were a chore to read and the author assigns meaning and significance to events that seem rather mundane, and then when under hypnosis became evidence of the visitor experience. The more I study the author, the more convinced I am that he will say anything for a dollar (including co-authoring a book with his dead wife from beyond the grave).
So much of the testimony relies on the work of Budd Hopkins, a known Ufologist who wrote "Missing time" years before Communion. Almost all of the subjects the man works with have the same story, but in my opinion if you're seeking out this specific person to perform your session, you already have some awareness of the road you are about to travel.
Budd Hopkins name is mentioned constantly, he really is the epicenter of this entire UFO scene from what I can tell, and I don't find him any more credible then Whitley Strieber. If I sold books on big foot, I'd be better off trying to convince people of big foots reality and I think that's what is going on here.
I want to believe, and I will go as far as admitting that visitation from other worlds is possible. But if the aliens are coming here to do what's described throughout this book, then they are wasting all of our time.
Where this book shines, is when the author provides hypothesis as why and what these beings are. But he goes on tangents and tries to qualify his ideas with anecdotal claims from various witnesses and it's extremely repetitive.
With that being said, if you're just gonna make this stuff up, at least make it entertaining. Instead we get an hour-long chapter about the historical significance of triangles in mythology.
The main issue with these fun to think about but hard to believe phenomenon, is we like to use the lack of evidence as a form of evidence. I don't remember putting my bowl of cereal in the refrigerator after I made it instead of eating it. Must be aliens! But it's this very thing that has given these modern mythological stories such staying power. Because above all it's fun to ask "what if?"
(My video review)
https://youtu.be/MPskEPxUaEI
November 18, 2021
I only got half way through, and realised it was going from bad to worse and would only keep going that way. Having battled through to finish another v.poor book against my better judgement this week (The Angel’s Game) I wasn’t in the mood to make the same mistake twice.
I know Whitley Strieber has been exposed as a fantasist / truth mis-speaker on other matters (eg his (non)attendance / (non-existent) role at a university mass shooting in Austin, Texas) but I got the impression that the experiences claimed in this book (constant dread, hallucinations etc) were largely due to chronic (occasionally acute) mental illness. Eg paranoid schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder and bipolar syndrome. For that reason, I feel genuinely sorry and sad for him. His description of living in a permanent state of fear and moving himself and his wife every few weeks / months from city to city / state to state from 1970 to 1977 to escape the ghosts that he saw in every new residence, was genuinely upsetting. Why was he never diagnosed and helped? If he is telling the truth about all the upset in his life up to the point in 1984 of his abduction and anal probing, then it makes claims that this book is another fraud by him seem less likely to be true.
I won’t bother commenting on the claimed ‘visitors’ that look like the picture on the front cover, other than to say it was a fad at the time the book was written, but it has gone now. I guess the images seeped into his damaged psyche through the discourse of the day.
For what it is worth, I was urged to read this ‘amazing’ book by a Catholic priest. He is a friend so I did it for him, but I fell halfway down the track!
Cliff
I know Whitley Strieber has been exposed as a fantasist / truth mis-speaker on other matters (eg his (non)attendance / (non-existent) role at a university mass shooting in Austin, Texas) but I got the impression that the experiences claimed in this book (constant dread, hallucinations etc) were largely due to chronic (occasionally acute) mental illness. Eg paranoid schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder and bipolar syndrome. For that reason, I feel genuinely sorry and sad for him. His description of living in a permanent state of fear and moving himself and his wife every few weeks / months from city to city / state to state from 1970 to 1977 to escape the ghosts that he saw in every new residence, was genuinely upsetting. Why was he never diagnosed and helped? If he is telling the truth about all the upset in his life up to the point in 1984 of his abduction and anal probing, then it makes claims that this book is another fraud by him seem less likely to be true.
I won’t bother commenting on the claimed ‘visitors’ that look like the picture on the front cover, other than to say it was a fad at the time the book was written, but it has gone now. I guess the images seeped into his damaged psyche through the discourse of the day.
For what it is worth, I was urged to read this ‘amazing’ book by a Catholic priest. He is a friend so I did it for him, but I fell halfway down the track!
Cliff
April 16, 2008
While I doubted this to be"the most ashtonishing true-life odyssey ever recorded - one man's riveting account of his extraordinary experiences with visitors from 'elsewhere'..." , I expected to enjoy the story better than I did.
Mr. Strieber's 'encounters' where a bit out-there, even for this "open to ET's" mind of mine! I just couldn't seriously entertain the tale Strieber was telling; the 'aliens' he describes are straight out of a B-Horror film. It was, however, a New York Times #1 bestseller, and a sequel ("Transformation") has been published (and, I assume bought/sold) so maybe the next reader will enjoy it more.
Mr. Strieber's 'encounters' where a bit out-there, even for this "open to ET's" mind of mine! I just couldn't seriously entertain the tale Strieber was telling; the 'aliens' he describes are straight out of a B-Horror film. It was, however, a New York Times #1 bestseller, and a sequel ("Transformation") has been published (and, I assume bought/sold) so maybe the next reader will enjoy it more.
October 9, 2012
What a crock of shit. I don't know who this guy was trying to fool, but he obviously didn't even remember much of his own retellings of his own story as he was writing it. Full of "my wife didn't know I was doing this" when he says she was, then "I didn't read anything on the subject" when he says he got a book on UFOs the day before his supposed "abduction". Just what a crock of shit. It's going in my burn pile.
March 22, 2014
I read this in the early 90s. It was haunting and preposterous at the same time. Any scrap of credibility Strieber had was killed when he started releasing follow up books.
At the time, it was fun to read and be a part of this booka a cultural phenomenon.
After all these years, this book remains "sticky" in my mind.
At the time, it was fun to read and be a part of this booka a cultural phenomenon.
After all these years, this book remains "sticky" in my mind.
August 31, 2015
Though a bit repetitive, I was intrigued and slightly terrified by Mr. Strieber's experiences. I admire his candidness on an issue often as taboo as alien abduction.
December 22, 2025
God awful.
Read this for research on a writing project I’ve been twiddling with, but also out of just genuine curiosity. However, this kind of stuff is hard to get through if you’re not already a believer in the UFO stuff and abductions.
When he isn’t stretching vague childhood memories, nightmares, possible sleep paralysis, and funny marks on his skin (relatively normal experiences), Whitley Streiber’s experiences can be discounted easily once you realize that there is no scientific evidence that hypnosis therapy does what they say it does. He tries so hard to sound level headed and as if he is approaching everything skeptically yet he doesn’t once consider that the method he is obtaining these blocked memories of abductions either doesn’t actually do anything or, if anything, puts you in a suggestive state in which you can trick yourself, or be tricked, into thinking these are real memories (I mean, he lets a UFO nut literally sit in the therapy session with him, and oh yeah the hypnotist was recommended by this same UFO nut). And that’s to give the benefit of the doubt that he isn’t outright lying about any of it, which I can’t even do, because the author is notable for lying.
Then, as the books goes on, the masquerade of sounding reasonable goes off, and the book goes into an incoherent spiritual rambling about triads, the environment, nirvana, and none of it made a lick of sense to me.
Read this for research on a writing project I’ve been twiddling with, but also out of just genuine curiosity. However, this kind of stuff is hard to get through if you’re not already a believer in the UFO stuff and abductions.
When he isn’t stretching vague childhood memories, nightmares, possible sleep paralysis, and funny marks on his skin (relatively normal experiences), Whitley Streiber’s experiences can be discounted easily once you realize that there is no scientific evidence that hypnosis therapy does what they say it does. He tries so hard to sound level headed and as if he is approaching everything skeptically yet he doesn’t once consider that the method he is obtaining these blocked memories of abductions either doesn’t actually do anything or, if anything, puts you in a suggestive state in which you can trick yourself, or be tricked, into thinking these are real memories (I mean, he lets a UFO nut literally sit in the therapy session with him, and oh yeah the hypnotist was recommended by this same UFO nut). And that’s to give the benefit of the doubt that he isn’t outright lying about any of it, which I can’t even do, because the author is notable for lying.
Then, as the books goes on, the masquerade of sounding reasonable goes off, and the book goes into an incoherent spiritual rambling about triads, the environment, nirvana, and none of it made a lick of sense to me.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 829 reviews