I was really excited about reading this book. Universal Design for Learning is inherently interesting and after reading the advertising blurb about this book, I expected it to give specific examples of ways to use UdL to plan inclusive instruction in particular for BIPOC and LGBTQ+ students. That's not what I got. After a very general introduction about planning for variability, the books examines the aspects of UdL, once again in very general terms, then goes on to talk about school level models of support, again, in extremely general terms.
In general the book is superficial and lacking in nuance. It is one of those education books where the author merely cobbles together the ideas of other people with no real original synthesis or added value. It also stays at a very 30,000 foot level throughout. When specific strategies are suggested, more often than not they are simply bullet point lists with and not contextualised in meaningful ways.
The book is also totally lacking in the nuances of when, where and how things might work and when they might not. Every idea is presented as a gospel truth with no discussion of the situations in which the idea would work and when it might need to be modified. As such, I found pretty much zero practical guidance which I felt I could translate into my own practice.
Here is an example of the superficiality of the text: GPS is given as a metaphor for assessment for learning. The Destination is "Where am I going?" - fair enough, but then, the 'turn-by-turn directions' are compared with feedback. Good feedback is absolutely nothing like turn-by turn directions. It is more like a description of where the student is now with a discussion of strategies they might try next to move towards the direction. Feedback provided as 'turn-by-turn directions' would rob the student of the thinking necessary to become autonomous, but such superficial metaphors are ubiquitous in this book.