My god. This is, hands down, the best book of essays and memoirs on poetry writing that I've ever come across...right up there with Gioa's "Can Poetry Matter?" and Hugo's "The Triggering Town".
Ever since I first read Stephen Dunn's poetry, I was impressed by his skill with language and narrative...his ability to engage the reader's attention even in a longer poem...and especially his critical and unsentimental approach to his own virtues and vices. After first reading his poems, I remember feeling like if there was one contemporary poet with whom I'd most benefit from taking a class with it would be him. After reading his essays, my intuition has been more than confirmed as correct.
Among the many, many passages in this book that reward contemplation, here are just a few:
"We can go months, even years, without ever being crucially spoken to. The simplest good poem is a small correction of that."
"Some things I know: If you go into the casino with one hundred dollars, don't expect to win a thousand. If you approach poetry writing without reading great poetry, you will reach, at best, the level of your ignorance."
"I have distrusted 'sincere' people for as a long as I've encountered them, people who begin sentences with 'In all candor...' and conclude them without a deep enough sense of it...In poetry, likewise, I've distrusted the unadulterated heartfelt utterance."
"...what is dangerous in marriage is almost always desirable in poetry. One difference between a marriage and a poem is that a poem is place for various kinds of permissions; it welcomes anything that cooperates or is in tension with something else."
"The poet must not love difficulty. That's the solipsism of the prig, the person who believes he/she has something so precious it's worth concealing...we are always writing to fulfill our best sense of what a poem can be, against and in light of our predecessors. But it seems to me we must care and worry if we find that, as poets, we're talking only to each other."
"Often the not so good poem suffers from what may be called the egalitarian error; in its desire to be compassionate and fair it becomes merely correct."