Thorough from an architectural perspective and a great introduction to the social construction of science as seen through its museums. Yanni has a great talent for translating complex back-and-forths between scientists, architects and government officials in a way that is both fun and interesting to the reader. I only wish there was MORE of it. Some points of argument, namely regarding the Oxford Museum, rested too heavily on the repetition of concepts already well-accepted by historians of science in the 1990s, as far as I know, namely the idea that the "supplantation" of religion by science was not actually true and many scientists used natural history to affirm their belief in Divine Creation, and the rehashing of theories surrounding cabinets of curiosities. She also brings up some super interesting things about the development of museum as spectacle, ending it with looking at the Museum of Creation and Museum of Jurassic Technology. I really wish spectacle had occupied a bigger part of the discussion. It feels like it could be developed into a great book on its own!
Nevertheless, very solid introductory book for the social construction of science and its symbolization in architecture during the Victorian period.
detailing the history of natural history museums in the UK. I absolutely loved this book, its introduction was nicely broad and pulled together many larger ideas of the field. It served as a trusty historical account of much history, and the appendix conclusion was also quite interesting.