Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Getting Restless: Rethinking Revision in Writing Instruction

Rate this book
[This book] is a must for those committed to voicing the personal conflicts writers experience and to turning those confusing and sometimes dismaying moments into productive sites for questioning textual relations.

- Journal of Advanced Composition In Getting Restless , Nancy Welch calls for a reconception of what we mean by "revision," urging compositionists to rethink long-held beliefs about teacher-student relations and writing practices. Drawing primarily on feminist and psychoanalytic theories, she considers how revision can be redefined not as a process of increasing orientations toward a particular thesis or discourse community, but instead as a process of an act of getting restless with received meanings, familiar relationships, and disciplinary or generic boundaries--a practice of intervening in the meanings and identifications of one's text and one's life. Using ethnographic, case-study, and autobiographical research methods, Welch maintains two consistent aims throughout the In achieving these ends Welch examines three academic a campus writing center, undergraduate writing classrooms, and a summer workshop for K-12 teachers. This book will appeal to a wide audience, including classroom and writing center teachers, historians and theorists in composition and rhetoric, feminist theorists, and those engaged in literacy studies, teacher education, and connections/tensions among teaching, writing, and psychoanalysis.

198 pages, Paperback

First published March 17, 1997

3 people want to read

About the author

Nancy Welch

4 books3 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (40%)
4 stars
2 (40%)
3 stars
1 (20%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Elizabeth.
1,020 reviews
February 27, 2019
I really appreciated Welch's psychoanalytic glimpse into revision, particularly as she thought about how instructors/tutors/interlocutors exercise influence on writers in ways that threaten their agency and potentially diminish their voice. What I appreciated even more were the case studies where we saw this in action, and the ones where Welch made a concerted effort to it happening. Both offered instructive and fascinating glimpses into the writing process and the ways that writers develop as people and thinkers through writing.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.