As a milspouse, I've seen so many of these MLMs over the years. Thirty-one, Monavie, Cutco Knives, Tastefully Simple, Pampered Chef, Norwex, Stella&Dot, Nomades, Silpada, Matilda Jane, Gold Canyon Candles, Partylite, Scentsy, Jamberry, Lipsense, Monat, Nerium, Rodan&Fields, Doterra, Young Living, Usborne, and Lularoe. And probably some others that I've forgotten because no fellow military spouse ever invited me to one of their parties. But I have been invited to parties/demos/"career fairs" for all of the aforementioned shit, and in a few cases invited to become a consultant myself! Obviously, I missed the boat again and again and have resigned myself to a life of minimum wage scut work while raising children and banging out the occasional free book review. No fancy trips. No company car. No "team working for me" unless you count the aforementioned children who might occasionally deign to put their plates in the dishwasher, or fold their laundry while offering lots of "constructive feedback." :-D
The author mentions how these companies are scams and 95% of representatives will never even earn back their initial investment, then conflates this with White Supremacy... somehow. This never makes sense, because the typical target of an MLM scheme is an upper middle class white Stay-At-Home-Mom who is longing for acceptance, typically someone privileged enough to not need to work for awhile because her spouse is the breadwinner. Author insinuates that her wealth is an insulator from the MLM, while I would argue it's probably the opposite. A person who needs to work full time to put food on the table would buy an introductory kit, figure out the numbers and time commitment don't work, and would give it up after losing only a few hundred dollars, not the thousands upon thousands that full-time distributors can lose while "reinvesting" and "faking it til they make it." So... MLMs are bad because their very nature insulates Black/Brown/Poor people from being victimized by them....? I'm confused by that. It's like saying I'm disadvantaged because nobody is going to try and steal my yacht.
Anyway, this book started out with some promise, the author describes the cult-like behaviors that power MLM companies, which is helpful to the reader, but then it got soooo sloggy. She started working with this company after a high school acquaintance's little sister recruited her, and she became one of the major sellers in Seattle. She went to all the glitzy company events and took carefully filtered photos of herself using the products, having fun, and living her best life. She also alienated a bunch of people and became a blackout-level alcoholic. (She blames the MLM for this in the book, but it's clear to a reader that she absolutely had a substance abuse problem *before* joining. Sure it didn't help though.) Meanwhile, she'd earned "the car" and was raking in anywhere from $15K to $40K a month in downline commissions. But after she got arrested for a DUI, she went to rehab and after she dried out, she realized that it's shitty to harangue people into buying overpriced eye creams, and it's doubly shitty to harangue people into *peddling* overpriced eye creams so that you can level up in a pyramid scheme. Eventually (as in, a few hundred thousand dollars in commissions later), she decided to quit the scheme altogether. Because white supremacy.
I cannot stand this author/narrator. She is incredibly blind to her privilege in ways that are infuriating, and even by the end of the book doesn't seem to have caught much of a clue, and she's very hypocritical. Whatever her husband does, he makes enough money for her to stay at home with their five children, and even earned enough to be able to float her MLM sideline as it was getting off the ground. (Late in the book, she rips on Rachel Hollis for marrying a rich man to fund her business enterprises, but how are you different, Emily? Did you marry him *before* he was rich?) She doesn't seem overly contrite about the friends who were driven into debt after she'd recruited them into the company, including one whose family relations became very strained. A big random part of her thesis is that MLMs practice "white supremacy" because only wealthy white women can afford the startup costs. Given that this business structure is unprofitable to 95% of participants, why would you want to make it accessible to *more people* in the name of equality? Why not point it out as a predatory scheme that everyone should avoid?
One thing she pointed out that I hadn't been aware of was the level of political groupthink in MLMs. I know that many of them are overrun with Mormon SAHMs but she specifically mentioned things like QAnon and election conspiracies and tone-deaf responses to racial violence (women wearing charcoal-based face masks "in solidarity with their sisters of color," etc). Apparently, far right-wing echo chambering is not uncommon in some if not most MLMs.
Author, during covid, took her MLM spoils and got a certification in substance abuse counseling and currently peddles her skills as a public speaker.