This is an excellently and beautifully written novel. It's atmospheric and evocative of the period when it takes place. The characters have depth and complexity and their lives touched me and educated me. I was glued to my chair reading this, with feelings of dread, despair, and hope running through me as I worked my way through the 287 pages of thought-provoking story. Sounds like this is a 5-star book, doesn't it? It is, except that it let me down at the very end and that brought my rating down to 4.
This book was released in the U.K. in February of this year with the title THE FOUNDLING. I actually prefer that title to THE LOST ORPHAN, the one given this April 2020 U.S. release. I guess it was thought that we Yanks would not know what a foundling is, so the powers that be who name books were keeping it simple for us? Whatever the case and whatever its name, this sophomore effort by Stacey Halls (after her debut work THE FAMILIARS) is definitely worth the read.
The author brings the Georgian period to life in all its grimy, dirty ugliness for the poor and its sumptuous life for the rich, in the same way that Dickens gave us his complete picture of Victorian times. Dickens' novels were contemporary fiction when published and he used his own early life and his insightful powers of observation to expose socioeconomic disparities of the 1800s. Halls exposes these same disparities of the 1700s but obviously writing historical fiction using great research and an excellent imagination.
This story is narrated by two women: (1) Bess Bright, a young, lower-class boiled shrimp vendor living in the slums with her father Abe and useless brother Ned, and (2) Alexandra Callard, a youngish rich widow living a pampered but extremely limited life.
I found Bess to be an admirable character, hard-working, full of hope and a great attitude, living a difficult life with honor and responsibility. In 1747 she gave birth to an illegitimate daughter and, unable to care for her, delivered her that same day to the Foundling Hospital, hoping some day to save up enough money to reclaim her child. Six years later, in early 1754, Bess goes to do just that, only to find that someone pretending to be her had taken her baby away just one day after Bess had left her at the orphanage. It becomes Bess's mission in life to track down her daughter and reclaim her.
And then there's rich widow Alexandra Callard, living a privileged life in an upscale area of London. Alexandra is an extremely complicated character who was hard for me to understand and like at first, but, as the story progressed, the mystery of why she was the way she was became more clear. See, in spite of having everything she could possibly want, money, a beautiful home, a lovely young daughter, servants to take care of everything, she is a bit of a mess. She's afraid of life. She's cold and withdrawn emotionally, not even showing affection to her own daughter. She does not leave the house except for Sunday worship and does not allow her 6-year-old daughter Charlotte to leave either or to have any friends. She is obsessed with safety and with keeping her home locked up tight.
Bess and Alexandra's lives become entwined when Bess is hired as nursemaid to Charlotte, this through the intervention of Dr. Mead, a director at the Foundling Home where Bess had left her baby years ago and, coincidentally, Alexandra's only friend. It's pretty obvious early on the true connection these two have but there are a few puzzling how's and why's that will be revealed. But, more to the point, this is a great story about social injustice, about motherhood, about love and connection. About what makes for a good mother. What is more important: love and affection in a life of dire poverty, or a life of luxury without that affection?
The point about motherhood and the bond of mother and child would have been better presented with all things being equal, IMO. A mother's love (or at least kindness) in both economic situations. As presented in this story, the result is skewed to a great extent. One other problem I had with this plot is the ending, which is too pat, too tidy, with a too-abrupt personality change for one of the main characters.
Yet the grit, grime, poverty, atmosphere and socioeconomic levels of life in Georgian England are excellently represented here. In addition, the writing is superior and the characters, main and secondary, developed with real depth. This came close to being a 5-star book for me.