Once again, I’m writing a review on a book that I am conflicted on. Overall this book is a mixed bag.
So let’s start with the positives.
The concept is brilliant. I’ve always been a fan of genre based stories in a larger fictional universe. In this case, a thriller-horror book taking place in the Marvel Universe from the eyes of the average citizens. This book gets bonus points with how the main attraction isn’t even present for 98% of the book and when he is, he doesn’t say a word. But back to the main point: a psychological thriller about a mythical defender of Atlantis hunting these men worked perfectly for me and I’d love to see more stuff like it. If anyone has any recommendations, please leave them in the comments down below.
The art is near perfect. Dark, mysterious, chilling and a constant reminder of the dangerous world around them at all times. Namor is genuinely terrifying when we get glimpses of him and the art shines particularly bright in issue 02 when our main character has a waking nightmare. I won’t spoil it but it just might be the most terrifying image I’ve seen in a comic book. I did however say it’s “near” perfect and that is true. It almost is. The only bad thing about it is Esad Ribic’s inability to draw human faces. But aside from that, he is the best part of this book.
The writing is good, as mentioned above, the concept is brilliant, and as I’m about to get into, only one thing really drags it down.
With that, the negatives, the pacing is what ultimately brings this book from a 5 star down to a 3 star. The first two issues are perfect, and if I was judging them independently, I would give it 5 stars. But issue 3 goes nowhere. Issue 4 is a little boring and the resolution in issue 5 is not as satisfying as I’d hoped.
Overall, Sub-Mariner: The Depths is a good book that could have been great if it was brought down to 3 and a half or maybe 4 issues. But in the end with great art and an even greater core idea, this book reminds me why I love Marvel Knights books: mature storytelling that takes risks. Maybe it doesn’t always pan out but I’ve always preferred a big swing and a miss to a middle of the road, nothing-book. I will read this again someday, 3.5 stars