What do you think?
Rate this book


272 pages, Hardcover
Published July 25, 2023
In her own writing about her work, Gwen John liked to use a particular French word: 'recueilli', which translates as collected or gathered-in. In a letter to Ursula Tyrwhitt of around 1910, summing up why she thought her work would matter, she wrote 'I think it will count because I am patient and recueillie in some degree?" The term was still important to her years later. In 1924, she wrote to Jeanne Robert Foster, I think you give too much of your time to people, you ought to be more recueilli perhaps (don't you think that French word is beautiful)’. In a note of 1931 she reminded herself, 'I am recueillie, am I not? when I think of Rilke or my work? Gwen John would have seen the word used often in French art criticism of her day to describe the interior painters with whom she had most in common, the Dutch masters and their modern followers. It was a term of high praise for those, past and present, who made figures in rooms the centre of their work. [218]
What does it matter, one might ask, if Gwen John is described as an entirely solitary figure? Put simply, there is more to lose for women artists in being understood as separate from the world in this way. It means that they are also often perceived as separate from the important developments in modern art, rather than a vital part of them; with nothing to say in their art beyond the story of their own strange lives, rather than having something to impart, beyond autobiography, to their world and time as well as our own. The effect is always a diminishment of who they were and the significance of what they made. [246]
"'I cannot imagine why my work will have some value in the world — and yet I know it will.'"