"The world, in reasonable fashion, demands of a woman that she do twice as much as a man to prove she can equal him", a direct quote from Anna E. Dickinson, one of the many brought forth in the wonderous fictional account by Joan Koster called That Dickinson Girl. Dickinson was a woman who during the Civil War, was a public figure who spoke against injustices at that time. Many are now calling writing like this "fiction based on truth" and Koster has created a story that readers will want to continue on, after the book has ended. The positive is this is the first in a series called The Forgotten Women. It is a strong start, leaving readers excited for who and what will come next. Joan Koster presents women in history whom we should never forget. Never let the memory of them die. That Dickinson Girl is the first, I hope, in many soon to come from this writer.
This fictional story includes many aspects to keep the reader engaged: romance, (multiple love stories, in fact), adventure, action, and issues that, while part of our past still play a part in our world, now and in the future. While some of the things in our country, today, situations that are still dangerous...during the Civil War, could get a person killed. In That Dickinson Girl, we see Anna and her companion, Julia, in danger from many people who do not like what she says and, in the end, she has become so popular with the people of the United States, and the government, that when she goes to Washington DC to give a speech in front of Congress, an attempt is made on her life (we also must remember that Koster took liberties with history, for her story). In attendance is the President, Abraham Lincoln. One of Anna's enemies vows not to let her attend and, if she does, promises to end this woman's defeat of the terrible ideals supported by the people of the South. Dickinson's weapon was not only her words but her presentation of herself to others, to the world at large, the zeal and determination she has for the world to be a better place for all.
Despite all Anna Dickinson's good, she is not as likable as one would think, at least, to me. Maybe it was her youth that made her so likable to many, yet unlikeable at the same time. Only in her early twenties, she was a woman who did and said whatever she wanted without fear of anything, especially, consequences. That is usual when one has the ignorance of youth and a good, sturdy, upbringing, before the reality of what life is really like, is learned. On the other hand, it is that same ignorance that made her so appealing to others, charming, giving her the ability to inspire the masses along without having fear of the consequences or what could happen after, with regards to the things she said and did. A woman I can honestly say fulfills the statement, "you will love to hate". More so, for me, than anyone ever has before.
At the time Dickinson was alive, there were women who were fighting solely for women’s right to vote. Dickinson was not one of them, though she supported the movement, and she connected with women like Anthony and other leaders. Anna Dickinson fought for the men who were in the War, for the South to end slavery, and for all people to be equal. Anna’s fight for justice was more for everyone, she was more relatable, I think, than others with what she chose to fight for. And, Koster gives us something that usually, I think, many writers might choose not to display. that Dickinson was not solely motivated to speak as she did, do the “work” that she had a calling for, if it did not also bring her financial success and fame. I get a sense that if there was none of that, if people were to barely know the girl, Dickinson would have walked away to do something else that she could be
successful at. And, had she not been able to support her family, for that matter, Anna might have had to give up and come home from her profession, as a public speaker, to take care of her ailing mother. Koster did a very good job creating a family portrait in this book, that made me have mixed feelings over some of the ways, actions and things said by the Dickinson family to each other.
My favorite of the story is the character Julia Pennington who is the one who provides the life for the storyline of the book. First on her own, with her sister and then, her life with Anna Dickinson. Julia is very much the “every woman” facing issues that many did during that time. And I like the fact that the writer, Koster, decided to tell the story, not from the viewpoint of Dickinson, but Julia, who is more relatable and, more interesting, really, in the end. Pennington is a “sort of Quaker” who lives in the shadow of a crime her father had done, essentially, paying for his sins with the failure of her own life. Why I say, “sort of Quaker”, is because Julia’s father had done his Meeting wrong. And sadly, we find, the group does not turn the other cheek, forgive easily as they do with all else, as their religion commands, when the crime occurs from within. That the Quakers punish the child for the sins of the father, is very foul indeed. And really turned me off, when it came to how I felt about the Quakers in the book. Hypocrites like the rest of the world, telling others to forgive and forget but being unable to do so themselves.
As Anna inspires Julia, that is how the two meet. Because Julia did not like Anna at their first meeting, nor the second, it is only after many times do the two women connect. When they do it is so Julia can find her little sister, the one thing that means the most of anything to her. Julia agrees to become Anna’s companion. Traveling together, Julia and Anna fall in love. Even then, after the girls are lovers, Julia remains Anna’s subordinate. Anna always comes first. Knowing that everyone has their own life, and Julia has always had plans to get to her sister and take care of her, readers know that, eventually, something must happen for Julia to put her needs first over the woman she loves. It is only a matter of when, and then, how Anna will react. If Julia is to leave Anna, will that be seen as a betrayal to the young, headstrong and selfish woman? And, will the girls’ love last forever or will one, or both, in the end, submit to love and life with a man?
At that period in time, I believe it would be hard, for women who wanted rights, to be able to give these rights up and love a man. Because in giving yourself over a relationship which would turn into marriage, the woman must then give herself wholly over to him, becoming his, akin to property. How hard that must have been to do. While some of them might not have minded, I believe many of those who fought for equal rights had a hard time with romance with a man. After all, at that period in time they did not even believe that romance between women was possible, at least, not like the relations men could have with one another. As I write this, I almost laugh at the thoughts people once had and that they, thinking women were not capable of so many things, overlooked them completely for a period in time, of being capable of making love to one another. And though I think romance, physical, emotional, every type of romance is possible between women, when you have a society that tells girls that when they marry they will be the property of their husband, depending on what that girl thinks about husbands in general, along with how they feel about being property, well, it may be hard for a little girl, who, for instance, saw her mother
beat by her husband, unable to do anything, go and marry then, herself. Be property of men when they fear the sex, as a whole, because of prior evidence seen.
For readers, that is why reading this book is important. Because we want to keep the memory of women who fought for the rights of others alive, in history, in our people, in our memory. I knew nothing of Anna Dickinson when I read this book. And, while people could write memoirs of historical persons, sometimes, for people to be kept in memories, all that is needed is to include them in a story. Because, when it comes to the truth of things, memories, or anything, how much of the truth is in things we really ever remember? And there is never a more true statement (even more than the statement made about Anna) that the truth is stranger than fiction. I have read true stories that curdle the blood worse than anything that a writer has invented. It's sad that the human mind can create horrors in reality much worse than the ones that are invented, never really happened except on paper.
Recently having read The Book Spy by Alan Hlad, there were scenes in the book he created to help keep moments in history that happened, alive. On February 22, 1943 there was a plane called the Yankee Clipper (Pan Am) that crashed in Lisbon’s Tagus River. There were thirty nine people aboard, twenty four of whom died. Such a little incident, so long ago, was probably all but forgotten even by those who had anyone they personally knew who was involved in the crash, because it happened so long ago. In doing research for his book, Hlad discovered this crash and included it in the events of the book, to help keep the memory of those involved, especially those who lost their lives, alive.
And, in writing That Dickinson Girl, Koster did much of the same, choosing points in time to keep alive for readers, adding story points to the book, to keep it moving for readers, But, in writing this story, in bringing Anna to these pages from long ago, she introduces readers like me and you to a person who was very much a part of our history and someone, you, like me, probably knew nothing about. While this is a fictional book, there are parts that are a part of real history, real paintings that remain of many of the characters and speeches, quotes that came from Anna, from the speeches she gave, events from her speaking engagements, so long ago.
When it comes right down to it, after I have lived and learned I realize that, even the truth as people know it to be, is never the truth as it really was. We only have to read And There Was Light, by Jon Meacham, about President Lincoln and what we thought we knew about the history of this President, what he really thought about the issue of slavery, to see that what we learn about the world, what we learn about the past, is never as true as reality, as really living it. If only I could find and confront my old History teachers, wish they were more “well read”. But then there is the issue if parents even want their children to learn the truth as most would probably want to sugar-coat history anyway. Shame on those parents.
To keep the memories of the people alive who tried to make the world we live in a better place I strongly recommend this great book about a woman, until now, I never had heard anything about.
Oddly enough, as a young woman I cared more about the rights of women but, as I got older, began to care more about the rights of all, with less of a focus on the sex in which I am a part of. That is why That Dickinson Girl was such an important read for me. Because Anna herself focused on the rights of many more than just women. She saw that there was a bigger issue, at the time, in our country, that needed to be taken care of over and above the rights of women. With soldiers dying in the war, men at work in mines with poor labor conditions, so many poor, there was more that needed to be spoken about than voting rights. Anna filled a need the country had, at that time. She was a voice that came straight out of left field, the young, little woman, girl that she was. And, there were other people, other women, at work on suffrage, at the time. Anna saw the need for a young woman, a strong, bright, boisterous woman, speaking up to the country about the need for all to have the same rights.
This great little twenty-some year-old girl, who got frightfully sick each time before she spoke, paved her way with her large voice, broke barriers many never thought capable of one so young. Determined as the girl was, there is even a scene in the book where Anna stands up to men who want her to stop speaking out against the desires of the South and she stands firm, stands with her words, and breaks them down. Koster manages to take the parts of the history she can find about Anna Dickinson, fill them in, and make one of the best reads I have come across in women’s literature in a long time. Reminding me of the All American Girl books for young readers that began to be popular when I was young, this is the All American Woman version of the stories. That Dickinson Girl chisels out a space in this genre (women’s literature and history) on the shelf, for this work, as all necessary books readers need to cherish. A great read, highly recommended and necessary for women who want to know about those who came before them, as well as men who think that we all have a place together, in this world.
Happy Reading!