I visited Vancouver about a year ago and picked this up from an indie bookstore. From the synopsis on the back, I thought I would learn about the ways incarceration operated in Canada and targered indigenous communities, as well as hear personal stories and experiences. For the most part this was addressed with prose, letters, photos direct quotes from government documents, policy briefings, news articles, TV shows, and more. The change in how information was presented through various mediums was highly engaging, authentic, and bluntly: showed how fucked up all this shit is.
Maybe I don't have enough insight (or maybe I am just overthinking?) but I think this might have been better if it was focused on fewer aspects of the prison industrial complex. Yes, the entire system is complex and broken and needs nuance to unravel all the fucked up layers that exist, but I think specific experiences deserve to be highlighted and focused on narrowly. Jumping between different mediums didn't throw me off, but I did find it challenging to switch from a US-perspective, to Canada-perspective, to addressing systemic racism in the US and history of anti-blackness in the creation of prisons, to Canada's anti-indigenous leglislature, to mentions of mental health and s*ic*de with specific cases, to deportation and what that looks like in the US vs Canada, and so on and on. I wondered what the book would look like if fewer issues and/or experiences were highlighted. Also a question that arose for me constantly is: Who is allowed to write what? (in relation to identity politics and lived experiences and presenting it in prose format)
Overall this book has made me want to do more research on the history of incarceration in the "West" (as well as find literature pertaining to LGBTQ+ experiences with the prison industrial complex) as I continue to educate myself on prison abolition.