Countering the argument that radical socialist James Connoly of the Irish Citizen Army and the leaders of the Irish Republican Brotherhood expected a defeat (and were motivated by a desire to provide a "blood sacrifice") in the 1916 Easter Rising against the British, Foy (history, The Methodist College, Belfast) and Barton (Queen's U., Belfast) present a chronological account of the uprising and its aftermath, including the trials and executions of many of the leaders of the Brotherhood. Distributed by International Publishers Marketing. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
For the layman this ticked enough boxes and gives a good account of this important moment in Irish history early in the 20th century, but I'd imagine for those looking for something more substantial works on the subject to look elsewhere. If, like me, you wanted to learn of this history having known hardly anything about it, then it's worth a read.
Superbly researched and well written - but I was left nearly as clueless about the big picture of the Easter Rising as I was when I started. If you're already familiar with the events of the Rising and you want an in-depth examination of individual storylines, this is the book for you.
Written by a school teacher at Methodist College Belfast and a former pupil of the college, this is an accessible history that will find traction with secondary school audiences. Scholarly, yes; but it does not bring nearly the same academic rigour as Townshend or even Caulfield.
On the positive side, it presents the key events of the Rising in handy chapters dealing with each of the rebel positions in turn. This offers a degree of clarity that the day-to-day narratives followed by other histories do not (Particularly for one who is unfamiliar with the geography of early 20th Century Dublin).
On the negative, in striving for balance and impartiality, the authors have lost much of the brutality and horror and avoided the growing debates that surround the Rising and its place in Irish history.
A readable introduction, but far from being the 'standard work' that its endorsements suggest.
Full of stats and detail of the military strategy which gets too cumbersome. The best pieces are when the feeling and response of the people are described. No matter what your opinion on the Rising is, they were incredibly brave.