What do you think?
Rate this book
Awakening: An Introduction to the History of Eastern Thought
Provides an overview of the historical development of Eastern traditions of religious and philosophical thought. An Introduction to the History of Eastern Thought engages students with anecdotes, primary and secondary sources, an accessible writing style, and a clear historical approach. The text focuses on India, China, and Japan, while showing the relationships that exist between Eastern and Western traditions. Patrick Bresnan consistently links the past to the present, so students may see that Eastern traditions, however ancient their origins, are living traditions and relevant to modern times. Learning Goals Upon completing this book readers will be able MySearchLab does not come automatically packaged with this text. To purchase MySearchLab, please or you can purchase a ValuePack of the text + MySearchLab (at no additional cost): ValuePack 0205887775 / ValuePack 9780205887774.
397 pages, Paperback
First published June 1, 1998
6 people are currently reading
70 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
September 23, 2025
if you like this review, i now have website: www.michaelkamakana.com
180220: excellent introductory textbook to an entire tradition of philosophical thought little known in the ‘west’. rather than the core impetus for philosophy being hellenic, familiar names such as plato, aristotle etc, the thought universe begins with indic texts such as vedas, upanishads, bhagavad ghita, leading to flowering of buddhist philosophy. this is introductory, not ‘primary’ texts of great historical vintage, and the five i rate with that in mind. do not ask for details, for full explicit meanings, but follow this as engaging history. this is easy to read, fluid, translations exact, and i suggest that as these philosophies are living it is useful to see how this thought has developed...
i have read some ‘eastern’ philosophy now, mostly indic-buddhist (102), and bresnan recounts how it is an outgrowth of what is now called hinduism, a sort of ‘reform’ movement, a new interpretation, of the founding texts, the vedas, of indic civilization. he goes into some geography, history, culture of the areas the vedas arose, and i found this great as that part of the world is mostly unknown to me. i do not know what the current theories are about the arrival of aryans and the indigenous dravidians, only that i might have bought into a eurocentric narrative denigrating the indigenous. at any rate, the vedas are kind of founding myth of aryans and support if not establish all those aspects of hinduism i thought i knew, caste etc...
throughout this tradition, in all thought, there are certain axiomatic assumptions shared by all cultures, but the clearest confusion to the ‘western’ thinker is the ‘why’ motivating philosophy. there is no clear division between religion and philosophy, indeed the ‘why’ is to ‘use’ philosophy for what seems religious ends, that is, to answer the unanswered questions of human existence, which can be seen as dream, illusion, ignorance, from which we must be ‘woken’ or ‘enlightened’. in the ‘west’ the metaphysical conflict is between good and evil, in the ‘east’ it is between ignorance and that form of embedded knowledge we call ‘enlightenment’. all thought examined here is philosophy of how to become so enlightened, whether this is called moksha, nirvana, satori...
there are other shared assumptions, such as reincarnation, though how this works with karma is not much looked at here, but another interesting aspect is that enlightenment is seen as here and now, not after death, however extensive or prolonged the process of becoming so. there is the universal practice of meditation. there is the unrecorded history of oral traditions, which when compiled became the vedas for example, so the hindu practices, still continuing, are very much alive...
buddha (awakened one) The Life of the Buddha: According to the Pali Canon was himself hindu, of the warrior caste, and operated in such cultural matrix where it was, for example entirely acceptable and even honored to leave the world of usual work, farming, merchant, warrior etc, and dedicate oneself to spiritual concerns. i always found such ‘renouncing’ the world and its pleasures for something i could not name, brave and terrific and wanted to do that myself, but this is not ancient india. so i have satisfied myself by reading about it. then things happen. now i enjoy this text because it affirms all that i have read of various forms of buddhist thought and lives and now know to call this liberation from the pains of the world ‘enlightenment’...
this text progresses from hinduism through buddhism and he gives great outlines of core teachings of the historical buddha: the four noble truths, the eightfold path, and goes on to elaborate how this ‘pali canon’ became extended into the ‘Mahayana’ (middle way) and doctrines such as dependent origination and ‘shunyata’ (emptiness) The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. it is this form of buddhist thought which spreads through the rest of asia from india, merging, changing, evolving with or against indigenous chinese ways of thought from confucianism and daoism into unique forms such as chan (zen in japan), but always remaining true to those core teachings. there is of course religious buddhism but the sort that fascinates me is the philosophical. though no logical system can prove itself, it has seemed to me that buddhism requires the least ‘belief’ from outside, and once given is supremely logical way of living that need not be considered religious. the last buddhist thought (or no-thought) examined here is actually where i first encountered it through art, and this is zen, possibly the most intellectually challenging, paradoxically, for by its nature all intellectual, rational thought is its own block to enlightenment... far better, probably, to begin at the beginning with an introduction like this text...
230626:
What the Buddha Thought
Why Buddhism is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment
Nietzsche and Buddhist Philosophy
Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings
Buddhist Philosophy: A Historical Analysis
Empty Words: Buddhist Philosophy and Cross-Cultural Interpretation
Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction
The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā
Self, No Self?: Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian Traditions
After Buddhism: Rethinking the Dharma for a Secular Age
Philosophers of Nothingness: An Essay on the Kyoto School
The Kyoto School
Nishida And Western Philosophy
Buddhism: A Philosophical Approach
What the Buddha Thought
Wisdom Beyond Words: The Buddhist Vision of Ultimate Reality
An Introduction to Buddhist Philosophy
Why I Am Not a Buddhist
Why I Am a Buddhist: No-Nonsense Buddhism with Red Meat and Whiskey
Samsara, Nirvana, and Buddha Nature
Already Free: Buddhism Meets Psychotherapy on the Path of Liberation
Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth
The Central Philosophy of Jainism
Jainism as Meta-Philosophy
A Hindu Theology of Liberation: Not-Two Is Not One
The Experiential Dimension of Advaita Vedanta
Dao De Jing
Chinese Philosophy and Philosophers: An Introduction
China in Ten Words
180220: excellent introductory textbook to an entire tradition of philosophical thought little known in the ‘west’. rather than the core impetus for philosophy being hellenic, familiar names such as plato, aristotle etc, the thought universe begins with indic texts such as vedas, upanishads, bhagavad ghita, leading to flowering of buddhist philosophy. this is introductory, not ‘primary’ texts of great historical vintage, and the five i rate with that in mind. do not ask for details, for full explicit meanings, but follow this as engaging history. this is easy to read, fluid, translations exact, and i suggest that as these philosophies are living it is useful to see how this thought has developed...
i have read some ‘eastern’ philosophy now, mostly indic-buddhist (102), and bresnan recounts how it is an outgrowth of what is now called hinduism, a sort of ‘reform’ movement, a new interpretation, of the founding texts, the vedas, of indic civilization. he goes into some geography, history, culture of the areas the vedas arose, and i found this great as that part of the world is mostly unknown to me. i do not know what the current theories are about the arrival of aryans and the indigenous dravidians, only that i might have bought into a eurocentric narrative denigrating the indigenous. at any rate, the vedas are kind of founding myth of aryans and support if not establish all those aspects of hinduism i thought i knew, caste etc...
throughout this tradition, in all thought, there are certain axiomatic assumptions shared by all cultures, but the clearest confusion to the ‘western’ thinker is the ‘why’ motivating philosophy. there is no clear division between religion and philosophy, indeed the ‘why’ is to ‘use’ philosophy for what seems religious ends, that is, to answer the unanswered questions of human existence, which can be seen as dream, illusion, ignorance, from which we must be ‘woken’ or ‘enlightened’. in the ‘west’ the metaphysical conflict is between good and evil, in the ‘east’ it is between ignorance and that form of embedded knowledge we call ‘enlightenment’. all thought examined here is philosophy of how to become so enlightened, whether this is called moksha, nirvana, satori...
there are other shared assumptions, such as reincarnation, though how this works with karma is not much looked at here, but another interesting aspect is that enlightenment is seen as here and now, not after death, however extensive or prolonged the process of becoming so. there is the universal practice of meditation. there is the unrecorded history of oral traditions, which when compiled became the vedas for example, so the hindu practices, still continuing, are very much alive...
buddha (awakened one) The Life of the Buddha: According to the Pali Canon was himself hindu, of the warrior caste, and operated in such cultural matrix where it was, for example entirely acceptable and even honored to leave the world of usual work, farming, merchant, warrior etc, and dedicate oneself to spiritual concerns. i always found such ‘renouncing’ the world and its pleasures for something i could not name, brave and terrific and wanted to do that myself, but this is not ancient india. so i have satisfied myself by reading about it. then things happen. now i enjoy this text because it affirms all that i have read of various forms of buddhist thought and lives and now know to call this liberation from the pains of the world ‘enlightenment’...
this text progresses from hinduism through buddhism and he gives great outlines of core teachings of the historical buddha: the four noble truths, the eightfold path, and goes on to elaborate how this ‘pali canon’ became extended into the ‘Mahayana’ (middle way) and doctrines such as dependent origination and ‘shunyata’ (emptiness) The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. it is this form of buddhist thought which spreads through the rest of asia from india, merging, changing, evolving with or against indigenous chinese ways of thought from confucianism and daoism into unique forms such as chan (zen in japan), but always remaining true to those core teachings. there is of course religious buddhism but the sort that fascinates me is the philosophical. though no logical system can prove itself, it has seemed to me that buddhism requires the least ‘belief’ from outside, and once given is supremely logical way of living that need not be considered religious. the last buddhist thought (or no-thought) examined here is actually where i first encountered it through art, and this is zen, possibly the most intellectually challenging, paradoxically, for by its nature all intellectual, rational thought is its own block to enlightenment... far better, probably, to begin at the beginning with an introduction like this text...
230626:
What the Buddha Thought
Why Buddhism is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment
Nietzsche and Buddhist Philosophy
Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings
Buddhist Philosophy: A Historical Analysis
Empty Words: Buddhist Philosophy and Cross-Cultural Interpretation
Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction
The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā
Self, No Self?: Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian Traditions
After Buddhism: Rethinking the Dharma for a Secular Age
Philosophers of Nothingness: An Essay on the Kyoto School
The Kyoto School
Nishida And Western Philosophy
Buddhism: A Philosophical Approach
What the Buddha Thought
Wisdom Beyond Words: The Buddhist Vision of Ultimate Reality
An Introduction to Buddhist Philosophy
Why I Am Not a Buddhist
Why I Am a Buddhist: No-Nonsense Buddhism with Red Meat and Whiskey
Samsara, Nirvana, and Buddha Nature
Already Free: Buddhism Meets Psychotherapy on the Path of Liberation
Jaina Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth
The Central Philosophy of Jainism
Jainism as Meta-Philosophy
A Hindu Theology of Liberation: Not-Two Is Not One
The Experiential Dimension of Advaita Vedanta
Dao De Jing
Chinese Philosophy and Philosophers: An Introduction
China in Ten Words
July 29, 2024
Interesting and concise text on the major philosophical ideas and historical developments of different Asian religions. Read this for a class and this is certainly one of the better textbooks I’ve read, but there are definitely sections where I don’t feel Bresnan’s analysis offers deeper understanding of the texts he is referencing. His prose is great at times and there are definitely moments in this that are memorable and engaging, but still this work often felt tedious.
July 2, 2018
Read for class but gives the back ground into the Eastern Religions, Hinduism, Buddhism, Chinese Buddhist, Confucius , Daoism, Shintoism, and the world today.
June 10, 2013
Yes it's a textbook, no it's not boring.
Very well-organized and easy to read. It focuses on philosophy rather than religion, though the two go hand-in-hand often here: Hindu, Confucianism, Dao, Shinto, etc. But most of all Buddhism.
I've read other books on Buddhism as a philosophy, and here Bresnan captures its merits the best I've seen. If you ever compare his explanation of the Doctrine of Emptiness to that of just about anyone else, you'll see what I mean. He makes light reading out of even the heavy stuff, without losing any depth.
Perhaps best of all, if you've got questions about these philosophies, like, "Why would someone come up with this stuff? And why would anyone follow it? Why the heck do I care?" This book has got answers you can understand.
Very well-organized and easy to read. It focuses on philosophy rather than religion, though the two go hand-in-hand often here: Hindu, Confucianism, Dao, Shinto, etc. But most of all Buddhism.
I've read other books on Buddhism as a philosophy, and here Bresnan captures its merits the best I've seen. If you ever compare his explanation of the Doctrine of Emptiness to that of just about anyone else, you'll see what I mean. He makes light reading out of even the heavy stuff, without losing any depth.
Perhaps best of all, if you've got questions about these philosophies, like, "Why would someone come up with this stuff? And why would anyone follow it? Why the heck do I care?" This book has got answers you can understand.
October 26, 2009
Textbook, No Comment.
December 21, 2013
This book is now teaching different yogas.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews