Author Ray Bradbury, although sometimes derided by the hardcore “hard” science fiction fans, inspired millions with his fantastic tales about Mars. Some of those he inspired ended up becoming scientists, whose intellectual fires, first kindled by Bradbury, eventually had practical applications.
Science fiction, then, can have an effect on science reality. Sometimes it inspires it, acting as a driving force, while at other times, it acts more as a predictor. Sometimes the predictions are fairly wide of the mark, while other times they are eerily on the nose, almost prescient.
A very informative and entertaining book could be written on the subject of the relationship between science fiction and science fact. Unfortunately, “The Science In Science Fiction” ain’t it. Yes, the book is entertaining enough, but it’s not too informative, and is ultimately pretty facile.
Part of the problem is that it is arranged alphabetically, with a handful of entries for each letter. Sometimes—as in the case of less-used letters—there’s only one entry. This categorization could have worked if the book were longer and thus a solid reference material. Most of the entries are only thumbnail-sized in length; a few concepts, like Heinlein’s “Waldos” rate only a paragraph or two. Some of the concepts treated—again, in only the most cursory and glancing fashion—are a real stretch. They’re probably no closer to being a reality now than they were when Hugo Gernsback was selling anti-zeppelin insurance in the back of his speculative pulps.
This is ultimately the kind of book that’s best left on the water tank in the bathroom, and read in small bursts. After that, it’s best used either as a doorstop or something to add to the pile that goes to the used bookstore when it gets too big too fit on the shelf. Meh.