Simply stated (and as nicely as I can say), this book is bad. Really bad. How it ever got published is beyond me. Bad grammar. Bad punctuation. (Middle-school-English-teachers-would've-handed-it back-for-corrections bad.) Badly (if at all) researched. (Seriously, how hard would it have been to Google how do you get the bends? instead of giving the wrong explanation?) Badly written. Overall, just...BAD. Don't believe me?
From page 162...
She had always been such a naive girl; always believing the best about people.
"Oh, you're so naive, Alexandra. It is great that you always believe the best about people, but always watch your back, my darling..."
The author does this constantly. Saying it once is enough. The same goes for using one word multiple times in a paragraph. It's like the author doesn't know how to use a thesaurus. And if Izzy or Charles had said my love or my darling one more time, I would've thrown my Kindle across the freakin' room! (Hello? Editor? Wherefore art thou?)
From page 203...
Loose coconuts and rotten mangos lay scattered on the ground everywhere. It was an island paradise. Large boulders and palm leaves were scattered throughout the treed floor. It was a perpetual tourist hotspot for the sun seekers. Nearby Zanzibar Island was one of the most sought-after holiday destinations in Africa. Izzy took it all in. What's not to like? It looked like a postcard.
This paragraph has so many paradoxes and (let's face it) is just poorly written. (My English teacher would've called it clunky and taken her red pen to it.) Unfortunately, most of the book reads like this.
There were other things that bugged/frustrated me, too...
1) The archaeological world has been searching for years for Rhapta, Africa's first metropolis which mysteriously disappeared approximately 1600 years ago. Izzy and Alex discover the tops of its buildings during the low tide on a river. OK. Soooooo you mean to tell me that...after years of searching for this city...in this general area...by archaeologists and treasure hunters alike...that no one saw this because, what -- they only looked during high tide?! *groan*
2) Generally, men don't "giggle"...Though they do a lot in this book. How about snicker, chuckle, chortle...anything but giggle, please! (This is another instance that a thesaurus would've come in handy.)
3) At one point, Dr. Sam Quinn pontificates about how he's seen many people die, and those that know they're going to heaven pass with a smile on their faces. Um, I may be wrong, but I would think the only people who die with a smile on their faces are those that do so during sex. Just sayin'.
4) Why would someone with agoraphobia -- who doesn't venture outside her home (and hasn't for many, many years) -- need to wear a medical alert bracelet that says she's agoraphobic?!
5) A giant, screeching, prehistoric bird that guards the entrance to Rhapta and carries people away to its evil lair if they get too close? Now that's worth a giggle (and an eye roll)!
6) Charles has been kidnapped and possibly shot, so Alex immediately flies to Africa to get her father back. OK. Kudos to Alex for conquering her agoraphobia so easily and quickly. (I had to wear my suspension of disbelief hat, but that's all right...Sometimes people do extraordinary things in extraordinary situations.) But why didn't she call the authorities to investigate? (The more people involved in looking for her father the better, right?) And why did she automatically think that he got away from his kidnappers and went to a safe house that he kept in Dar es Salaam? Is Charles Superman? How would he even know where he was taken (that is, if he's even still alive)? Or, if he was lucky enough to escape, how exactly would he know how to get to the safe house from where he is? Too many (irrational) leaps of logic for my taste.
7) There's virtually no character development. (Shallow and bitchy are the first words that come to mind when I think of Alex...but those could be wrong since I still don't feel I know much about her after reading this book.) It also lacks basic character descriptions...I have no freakin' idea what any of these characters look like.
8) Since when is James Bond a TV character?!
This book was touted as "Indiana Jones meets Lara Croft with a twist of Bourne." Hardly! It was just...
BAD
.