While he celebrated higher education as the engine of progress in every aspect of American life, George Keller also challenged academia’s sacred cows and entrenched practices with provocative ideas designed to induce “creative discomfort.” Completed shortly before his death in 2007, Higher Education and the New Society caps the career of one of higher education’s exceptional minds. Refining and expanding ideas Keller developed over his fifty-year career, this book is a clarion call for change. In the face of a transformed American society marked by population shifts, technological upheavals, and a volatile economic landscape, Keller urges leaders in higher education to see and confront their own serious problems. With characteristic forthrightness and inimitable wit, Keller targets critical areas where bold thinking is especially important, taking on such explosive issues as the configuration of academic disciplines, the runaway problem of big-time sports, the decline of the liberal arts, and the urgent problems of finances and costs. Keller expected this book to ignite discussion and controversy within academic circles, and he hoped fervently that it would also lead to real thinking, real analysis, and urgently needed transformation.
Good reading on the planning and management of higher education.
This was a good read on the planning and management of higher education. Keller details the drifts in higher ed which have ultimately led the need for institutional transformation. Enjoyed the historical connection to how higher has changed. Incremental change is still slow but more needs to happen.
A troubling indictment of the state of contemporary American higher education. Still, Keller, who just died recently, still holds out the case that the United States, by virtue of its uniquely discipline-driven organization (i.e., specialty), remains the strongest example of the potential contributions higher ed makes to any society, and why it remains the envy of the world.
it's not a bad book. the set up (chapter 1) seems more like a critique of society and how "things aren't the same no more" than a critique of higher education. subsequent chapters were definitely food for thought.