Throughout most of this book, I found it difficult to distinguish between Dobson's discipline strategy and child abuse. In the first chapter he describes his love for his dachshund dog, Siggie, and his method of getting Siggie to go into his pen which involved threatening the dog with a belt. (He draws an analogy between disciplining a dog and disciplining a child - not that, in my view, using a belt is justifiable in either case). In chapter 6, Dobson recommends a way of getting a child's obedience "There is a muscle lying snugly against the base of the neck. Anatomy books list it as the trapezius muscle, and when firmly squeezed, it sends little messengers to the brain saying, "This hurts: Avoid recurrence at all costs." The pain is only temporary; it can cause no damage the way I am suggesting its use. But it is amazingly effective and practical recourse for parents when their youngster ignores a direct command to move". (p95-96). How completely irresponsible - I can imagine getting a call from the teacher at school telling me my child is trying to strangle another child (- hmmm I wonder where he got that move from!) As the mother of a strong-willed toddler, I believe that the worst thing you can do to a strong-willed child is to hurt them in any way. He has completely misunderstood his subject-matter.
Dobson's book is also written in a spirit that left me feeling disturbed. The parent-child relationship is described in adversarial terms. He uses words like "brattish" to describe a strong-willed child. He speaks about corporal punishment with a sense of relish and it seems to be the primary message of the book. (The last 3 chapters appear to be compassionately written, but on the last page or 2 of the book, he includes a letter from a reader that suggests he didn't go far enough with corporal punishment. (And there I was thinking we had left this miserable topic behind!)). The most disturbing part of the book was the way he tried to link it to an understanding of God, as a discipline strategy befitting of the Creator and yet he mentions that he is not a theologian, but makes theological statements throughout! I found it difficult to connect his overall discipline strategy with my Christian faith.
I bought the book blindly, not knowing anything about the author or his strategy as I wanted at least to consider different ideas about discipline rather than go with the Sears' approach as if that were the only way. At some points I had to return to Sears (The Book of Discipline) whilst reading this book, because the book made me so angry and frustrated, I needed an injection of something positive. The difference in spirit with which both books were written couldn't be more obvious. Both are written by Christians, yet Sears' book was written in a spirit of love, understanding and intelligence, Dobson's in a spirit of self-righteousness, effectiveness and adversary. In chapter 3, it is apparent that Dobson feels uncomfortable with the positive parenting approach because he cannot effectively and intelligently argue against it. He simply quotes a colleague's expression that it is "horse manure" (p45), which is disrespectful to the reader who remains completely unenlightened.
There were a few points he made that I did find helpful: the idea of balancing love and control, the idea that to love somebody is to give them freedom and he includes a compassionate chapter on ADHD.
The decision I am left with now is whether to throw the book down the rubbish chute, burn it, give it to my strong-willed child to destroy or hide it on my book shelf and let my child read it as an adult and let him appreciate that his mum didn't follow the advice inside.