"Dowling's compact and intelligently argued study is concerned with the late-Victorian emergence of homosexuality as an identity rather than as an activity.... [This identity] was formed out of notions of Hellenism current in mid-century Oxford that were held to be lofty and ennobling and even a kind of substitute for a waning Christianity."―Nineteenth- Century Literature
"Dowling's study is an exceptionally clear-headed and far-reaching analysis of the way Greek studies operated as a 'homosexual code' during the great age of English university reform.... Beautifully written and argued with subtlety, the book is indispensable for students of Victorian literature, culture, gender studies, and the nature of social change."―Choice
"Hellenism and Homosexuality... presents a detailed and knowledgeable... account of such factors as the Oxford Movement and the influence of such Victorian dons as Jowett and Pater and the evolving evaluations of Classical Greece, its mores and morals. It is also enhanced by [an] analysis of Greek terminology with homosexual connotations, as to be found, for instance, in Plato's Republic."―Lambda Book Report
The ABSOLUTE must read for all in the LGBT community. Presents to artistic/political struggle between the creative world and the world of family values. It lights the way from the French Revolution to Stonewall.
A very thorough and well-written study of homosexuality in the 19th century. I really enjoyed this book despite having read it mainly for research purposes. Very much recommend it to those interested in Oscar Wilde, Alfred Douglas, Arthur Symonds or Walter Pater. A must-read for those interested in 19th century literary queerness.
This is essential for anyone interested in how Hellenism and homoeroticism interrelated in the thought of John Addington Symonds, Walter Pater, Oscar Wilde, and others. Dowling frames this in a broader Hellenising trend at Oxford in the mid-nineteenth century, represented by Benjamin Jowett and Matthew Arnold. A terrific short monograph.
This is unreadable - typos from the very first page and sentences that run on for so long, the original point is lost! Who edited this, I wonder. The numeral "1" is even used in place of a capital "I" in an early instance. Unbelievable.
To me, it reads like the average undergraduate's research paper: Plenty of cited sources but nothing new to say or add to the topic.
I stopped reading this before, I was even at a quarter of the book. In the first chapter about 75% of the cases is "blablablablablabla" all the time. If this was all about explaining what "effeminatus" means in the Victorian contexted (aka everyone not adhering to the masculine ideal) then why on earth all this talk about Oscar Wilde and how great he was and what all these others did? Its almost as if the author is in love with her own writing. Afterwards, I was several pages into the chapter on victorian masculinity and still had no idea what it is. The author was endlessly talking and talking and yet it all seems to be pointless. No idea why others praise it so much. I just couldn't go on with this.
Quite an excellent account of the Greats curriculum in Oxford and the self-recognition and legitimation Victorian Oxford men could find in the same-sex leanings of the respectable Ancient Greeks.
One strange thing I find in Oxford, and part of this is related to the nature of my own research, is just how self-celebratory it is. I don't think anybody talks about Ruskin and Pater as much as scholars in the English Faculty here do. I actually feel like somebody has said, "Yo, I heard you like Oxford..."
This book was an overwhelmed grad. student's dream come true. Dowling's argument is coherent, her writing is clear, and she includes history efficiently so that you remember after you've finished reading.