Many years ago I foolishly bet one of my drinking comapnions in a bar that Shakespeare's "The Tempest" was *not* a comedy. Since this was in the years before the Internet, the bet was settled by crossing the street to a local bookstore and finding a book which purported to be an “authority” on Shakespeare. I lost, because my opponent was smart enough to find an author with a traditionalist view of the line between tragedy and comedy (no one dies: it’s a comedy). Had we been fortunate enough to locate this volume, it would have provided us with the concept of “tragi-comedy” and we’d have had a whole new argument to settle.
I bring that up because it seems to me that the real value of this edition of four Shakespeare plays is the analysis provided by David Bevington and his fellow-editors, not so much the texts of the plays themselves. These are, by and large, among the least-readable of Shakespeare’s works. They need to be seen in performance, not read alone, and this volume really is too unwieldy to work as a script for putting on performances. But, there is a good introduction to each play, some material on the history of their performance, details on the sources Shakespeare used to create the plays, and other tidbits like memorable lines and suggestions for further reading, all of which make this a useful addition to the Shakespeare fan’s collection.
Of the plays, my favorite remains “The Tempest,” which I take it was the last one Shakespeare wrote. It deals with questions of the New World and with magic and fantasy as well as the proper relationship between parent and offspring, when the child has matured to the point of independence. It is also the source-text for the science fiction classic “The Forbidden Planet,” so how could I fail to like it? After that, for me “Cymbelline” is a very good story of a man who, like Othello, unwisely doubts his mate’s chastity, but avoids the dire fate of that play’s protagonist. “The Winter’s Tale” is a good one that really needs to be seen to be appreciated, and “Pericles” has never made any sense to me at all. As the editors suggest, there are themes in all of them that suggest Shakespeare was coming to terms with his own maturity, especially questions of the proper relationship between fathers and daughters, aging husbands and their wives.