It's a challenge not to judge the character of someone who writes such a revealing and vulnerable memoir, but I'll do my best to stick to my views on the book, not my opinions of the author, whether I saw myself in her or what she should have done.
It's somewhat awkward when she comments on her own writing ability, as none of her characters come to life. Either her friends are known only by name, or a man is identified by his sexy eyes and hair (often long and tousled). Is Eli scrawny, athletic and fit, or of average build? I'm certain if I were marking up the book for a class, I'm certain I could locate the passages where she directly contradicts her previous descriptions. it's no problem to have your regard for someone change as you get to knt them and become more fond of them, but she should at least have noted how her opinion of him had changed over time. The first and only time we realize Eli is simply "too handsome" is when Norah states it: nowhere else do you get the impression he's anything but a dorky guy with an out-of-date hairstyle and a round face.
She notes several times how awful she feels about having put guys over her friendships, but she doesn't ever develop these friend characters to convince the reader they really are true friends. Having someone to party with or gossip to doesn't make them a friend. She complains how she could never be herself with the three Jennifer's, yet bemoans the loss of their friendship. I have to wonder if she knows a true friend when she finds one (Bevin being the only obvious friend she had in the book).
I was also struck by the sense her therapist in college, Dierdre, was a composite character. It's rare when you're being helped by those finishing up their masters or have an internship at a college to see the same therapist for more than one year. No, this isn't a big problem that she may have fused various therapists into one, but it did prevent her from making Dierdre into a real character, making her comments and responses to Kerry's struggles consistent, and make it clear where her insights came from, when in truth I couldn't understand at all what Dierdre was getting at. Obviously, Kerry has gone through a lot of counseling, both as a client and in getting her masters in counseling therapy, but none of this progress is shown in the book.
This, in turn, makes it difficult to believe that Kerry expresses from the outset theories about her poor self-image that are most likely the result of significant therapy. She says numerous times that she knew at heart she was unlovable, but this doesn't strike me as a belief a person would simply come upon by introspection. Rather, such a core issue would likely follow years of fruitless guessing as to why she can't find a good boyfriend: Is my nose too big? Am I too fat? Am I too short? Tall? Am I too serious? Do I not dress well-enough? The realization that none of these is the root of her troubles would come only after disproving one by one each of these attempts at fixing her problems unsuccessfully. People in bad relationships don't jump to the conclusion, "I must be unlovable." They tend to focus on more specific issues. Such phrases come only from years of therapy, which is fine, but she shouldn't present it as if it were obvious that was her core issue.
On a similar note, I questioned the finality with which she made many of her declarations: "Obviously I should have tended to Eli's hangover, put a damp towel on his forehead": obvious to whom? At another point, she concludes that anyone who sleeps with strangers while not intoxicated but fully conscious of their decisions is obviously a slut. I have to question that. Whether she truly believes this or not, it's a statement that speaks more to how others may regard you than a definite "truth."
*************SPOILER WARNING************************
Unfortunately, I came to doubt her story that she was a regular at Dorrian's, where Robert Chambers frequented. No, this isn't because I doubt all memoirists, and I do believe she'd at least seen Chambers at Dorrian's, where she may have gone a couple times, but I can't believe she went there as regularly as she said she did. For one, she notes how the girls there wear cocktail dresses, yet she never mentions what she wore, how she felt induced to go on a shopping spree to meet the standards of the "perfect girls" at Dorrian's. I wouldn't expect her to mention what she wore if she didn't refer at other times to wearing jeans and t-shirts (however sexy she wants us to imagine they fit her). And when later, she went to a party at Columbia and was shocked to find the females in cocktail dresses, I thought, well, why should she be surprised? Sure, noyt every scene in New York dresses up, but if she'd been a regular at Dorrian's, she would have at least considered it a possibility that this party was one such affair.
Finally, the ending was disconcertingly hasty. I didn't mind that she left it ambiguous whether she was "cured" of her desire to seek validation from men by getting their sexual interest, but I wish she could have made her future partner more substantial, not just presented him as a very empathetic guy but shown what else they had in common. Was she planning to marry the guy decent guy who came along? To me, that isn't the bass for a lifetime partnership.
Had she focused on her interactions with one male, as Toni Bentley did in Surrender, perhaps Kerry Cohen would have also failed in making him a three-dimensional character that is no more than a caricature. Or had Cohenraced through her sexual encounters, as did Catherine M. in her own sexual memoir, with a complete lack of insight into her own motives or longings, perhaps this book would have been less frustrating, however less human. But as it is, Cohen is self-aware to a certain degree and does make a great attempt at psychological awareness, and what results is a murky middle ground between Bentley's obsessive focus on sex and Catherine M,'s disturbing lack of emotion.
So why three stars? Because Cohen did unsettle me with her stories, which are all too painful and recognizable. She did make me question my own behavior and choice and my constant search for male approval. And for that, she should be commended. This is a painful book to read, but however flawed, well worth the time.
Anyone who identified with Kerry's experiences should definitely read Surviving a Borderline Parent: How to Heal Your Childhood Wounds & Build Trust, Boundaries, and Self-Esteem by Kimberlee Roth and Freda Friedman (2003). No, I don't get a commission by recommending it: it is a very valuable tool for those who've grown up with self-absorbed parents who put their own needs before those of their children.