“Lives of great men are like music, the tunes of which linger in our ears long after they are heard no more. Death snatches an individual from this earth, time draws its veil over him and he becomes a part of the past which grows dim as days roll on. In the case of great men, however, the past creeps into the present and becomes a part of the future. We remember them because we feel their presence in our midst…”
The desire for deliverance created during his early years and the teachings of Mill, Spencer and Comte, inculcated in him during his college days, led Tilak to the decision of dedicating his life to the cause of his country. The method of translating this pronouncement into action had also to be determined.
The stimulating ideas of Dadabhai, the exciting fervour of Chiplunkar, the pioneering social work of Ranade, and the heated discussions with Agarkar, helped Tilak find this way, and he started the arduous journey of public work through the noble profession of teaching.
After some time, the sphere of teaching was extended and Tilak became the educator of public opinion.
Differences with colleagues compelled him to leave the former sphere, but this enabled him to throw himself headlong into the latter and to assign his infinite energies to the task of influencing public opinion in the light of the ideas crystallised in his mind after a long process of thought, feeling and action.
The ideas did not remain with Tilak as abstractions, but were given a concrete shape through programmes which touched the hearts of people and made them active participants, rather than passive onlookers.
Tilak’s greatness lay in the execution of an idea, which in the beginning might not appear original or profound.
He had an exceptional judgment about the environment as well as individuals and discovered the ways through which the idea enfolded itself in a manner which captivated the imagination of the people, provided them with an incentive and made them conscious of their own strength as participants in a new movement.
Tilak’s political ideas were not different from those of other Congress leaders. But he was the first to realise the limitations of the social and political institutions which were mostly imitative in character. He realised the need of securing a wider basis for the political ideals and he felt that a participation of the people in the newly started movements was possible after creating in them a feeling of confidence and after making the pattern of the new movements conform to the traditional ways, so as to make people feel perfectly at home in them.
Tilak thought that the new ideals must be grafted — and not transplanted — on the life of the people. It was on account of this that he took to the revivalist method in his political work.
Through the Ganapati festival and the Shivaji celebrations, he was making the new ideas recognizable to the people and also creating in them a pride in the glorious past, which was an assurance of the glorious future in spite of the dismal present. In this work, Tilak picked up promising young men and built up a network of workers who came from the people and who therefore were potent instruments of influencing people’s minds.
In his anxiety to influence public opinion for political action, Tilak decided not to disturb their traditionalist ways in social life.
Notwithstanding their popular form, these movements would have grown stale and fizzled out, but Tilak knew that service, and not advice, was the right medium for getting access to people’s mind. The qualities of a leader are tested in times of crisis and Tilak’s superb abilities as a leader were testified to by the work he did during the famine and the plague.
In respect of sociology, he accepted the basis of ethical and metaphysical ideas which he advocated. He, therefore, held that society should be based on social duty and that all have equal dignity and equal reward, viz. salvation.
He accepted the material inequality in society on the ground that people with their attachment to life needed incentives. Tilak pointed out that Vedanta advocated the concept of equality, but the metaphysical ideal could not be a reality in society, because the selfishness of the average individual could not be eradicated.
Tilak argued that a sociologist had to be a realist and justified the concept of four Varnas in the Smritis. In support of his view, he made a reference to the opinion of Comte that society’s structure in future will require a four-estate system of which the first position would be occupied by the scientists and by those who guide the industry; this class would be future substitutes for the priestly order of the middle ages.
The words and deeds of stalwarts like Tilak, are not converted into the shadows of the past, but find a place in the hearts of millions, and become an inseparable part of the personality of the nation — and in some cases even of humanity.
An effort, consequently, to know the perennial significance of the work of a noble individual is in fact an attempt to know that part of our life which is his.
In the aforesaid respect, this book is a classic.