Genocide-themed stories have always been my liking. However for this particular book, Sebarenzi has kept the violence best at minimal and educate the readers heavily on post-genocide reformations initiated by the government to rebuild the battle-scarred country.
For the first few chapters, he thrilled the readers with tidbits of his childhood memories –the description of Lake Kivu and his appreciation towards the lake and also the honor he felt derived from raising cows were few that I found warm and the missing precious relationship between human and nature in today’s context. He had so little (like his new shoes), yet little Sebarenzi felt most content with what he once had. It works as reflection for my part to know the real worth of the little things surrounding me.
I appreciate Sebarenzi’s attempt to share his experience as the Parliament’s speaker and gave us the truest account on how a government actually works- either for the people, or succumb to their own selfish desires- in an extreme case it is gruesomely titled heavily towards the latter unfortunately. It is disheartening to see that power and money can be so corruptive, and how men heavily consume to the idea that power is central. The strength of few who claimed for reformations, social justice, equality, could not possibly overthrow the more powerful majority who were gravely against it to protect their interests, and the good men who chose to silence themselves aggravated the situation even worse. A quote by Frank Kent reflected this precisely: “The evils of the government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.”
Reading this book made me think, “All this sounds too familiar.” Perhaps, it really is.
I personally think my country is threading on the same string, dancing to the same music as Rwanda is: a resemblance of a democratic country, multiethnic/multiracial, and divisive by its nature. Colonialism broke the people apart, similar to the ‘divide and conquer’ strategy used by the colonials in my country. Governed by fear, these colonials knew best to keep the local people divided and fragmented by giving power to one party but denied it to another, lest that unity from that part would potentially harm their power. It worked, and the segregated legacy lived on. It seemed that the separation and the broken unity had deeply scarred the people and the possibility to stitch it back is proven to be impossible. Nevertheless, as decades passed by, as colonialism perished, local people managed to emerge as leaders. Yet divided nations are still, divided. This has been invariably caused by the same system that systematically discriminate the people implemented by the colonials has been adopted by the local leaders. This is the internal division that has been caused by the local people, not outsiders, not colonials. Thus, it greatly ensures that the social landscape remains the same as it was thousands of years ago: divided, oppressed, broken, and scarred.
As Sebarenzi claimed nearing the end of the book, the international communities now look at Kagame’s legacy and think that the economic advancements are something worthy to be applauded. Yet, from the worm’s eyes view, on the ground level, we would be able to feel the silent, unspeakable building tension between the people. The system and the policies have exacerbated the tension. The government is at fault. This reminded me of the ‘quota’ or reservation policy implemented in my country, and also another book I currently read on India write about the same reservation policy, a policy that is exercised because it is “essential to reverse centuries of accumulated discrimination.” There are some acceptable explanations in regards of such policies, yet I could not stop myself from thinking that this works as a subtle revenge of the people who were once felt discriminated against, who were once felt they were marginalized. Now that power is in their hands, it is their turn to oppress, to be superior and to win.
Discrimination breeds inequality. Inequality expedites tension. I understand the need of peace, reconciliation and equality that have been preached by Sebarenzi in his book. He knew that without peace and reconciliation, people would think that to break free from such discrimination, they need power. Thus, to have power they need to win. When they win, again, without peace and reconciliation, they will be the next oppressor toward the former oppressor. Without peace and reconciliation, this venomous cycle will continue from generation to generation. To break this cycle however, we need to restore equality that will eliminate the notion of discrimination. Thus in order to promote equality, we need to have a system and policies that is parallel to the notion.
I like the idea of peace education, in which my country is lacking now. We, as the older generation need to shoulder equal responsibility to halt violence, hatred and revenge from muddling our minds and put forward the idea of peaceful nation, one agenda that shall not be infiltrated by politics. This idea must be kept sacred and spared from any malevolence. Our children need to learn and understand what peace, equality, respect of one's lives, dignity, and needs mean. We need to teach them exactly that.