Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The First Hundred Years of Mikhail Bakhtin

Rate this book
Among Western critics, Mikhail Bakhtin (1895-1975) needs no introduction. His name has been invoked in literary and cultural studies across the ideological spectrum, from old-fashioned humanist to structuralist to postmodernist. In this candid assessment of his place in Russian and Western thought, Caryl Emerson brings to light what might be unfamiliar to the non-Russian Bakhtin's foundational ideas, forged in the early revolutionary years, yet hardly altered in his lifetime. With the collapse of the Soviet system, a truer sense of Bakhtin's contribution may now be judged in the context of its origins and its contemporary Russian "reclamation."


A foremost Bakhtin authority, Caryl Emerson mines extensive Russian sources to explore Bakhtin's reception in Russia, from his earliest publication in 1929 until his death, and his posthumous rediscovery. After a reception-history of Bakhtin's published work, she examines the role of his ideas in the post-Stalinist revival of the Russian literary profession, concentrating on the most provocative rethinkings of three major concepts in his dialogue and polyphony; carnival; and "outsideness," a position Bakhtin considered essential to both ethics and aesthetics. Finally, she speculates on the future of Bakhtin's method, which was much more than a tool of it will "tell you how to teach, write, live, talk, think."

296 pages, Paperback

First published November 3, 1997

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Caryl Emerson

49 books6 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (20%)
4 stars
6 (30%)
3 stars
8 (40%)
2 stars
1 (5%)
1 star
1 (5%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Illiterate.
2,888 reviews57 followers
May 20, 2024
The Russian reception of Bakhtin suggests he offers fertile concepts that lack clarity in their content and rigor in their application. That seems right to me.
Displaying 1 of 1 review