No one thinks they'll end up in an old people's home, but Claire Harper finds herself contentedly occupied with daily reading the foreign and business pages in The Times, learning poetry by heart and talking to Iris, one of the young girls looking after her. Peter Mansley's arrival changes all this. He takes Claire on outings, provides thoughtful treats, and offers a glimpse of romantic happiness that has so far eluded her. But whereas Peter is open, Claire is reserved, haunted by her tragic and empty past. Slowly, she is able to move on and contemplate the present with Peter. But can happiness last for ever?
Since I'm now approximately the age of the group of friends in this book, I probably have a little more tolerance for the story than some of the younger readers. Even so, I found the characters an incredibly self-absorbed lot. Do people in their 60s really engage in such interminable introspection? I certainly don't! Yes, a lot of the references are definitely dated, but having lived through that era, it didn't bother me. I thought the present-tense narrative voice was somewhat distracting, but eventually got used to it and only occasionally noticed it.
This book is about a group of friends who realize they are getting older, sometimes to their surprise. It explores their history together, but it seems the author looks pessimistically at the possibility of second chances, which I thought made the title ironic. Th character are drawn well and likable and I enjoyed the first 2/3 of the n]book quite a bit. But the ending brings one calamity after another. Too much like real life. I was hoping for fantasy I guess.
I love books where the characters are so very well developed that they start to feel like real people that you know. That is what this book was like. Very good read.
I have mixed feelings about this book. At the end of Part One the author convinced me of her authority, but I'm not sure if I am sold. Yet the writing is good, and I'm wondering where she's going with the characters, so I'm going to stick around a bit, because I am very much intrigued by characters who are in the latter parts of their lives.
Update: I finished it, but I feel very little for this book. Maybe if someone could help me understand any possible subtext, my opinion would change, but the characters seemed unchanging, boring, disengaged, and flat. Even the younger one, Sara, spends her days merely dodging actual relevance or meaningful engagement with the other characters. The most active character was the setting, with its ocean and weather. The only reason I finished this book was that the writer is very capable, and I was curious to see if anything of note happened by the end. The answer, regrettably, is no. No signs of life in any of them, still.
This is a book I bought a long time ago and never got around to reading til now! The setting is of interest to me--set in the Bay Area, mostly San Mateo County and SF, where I grew up.
Quirky novel of "old friends" as they age, cope, revisit their pasts, etc.
A well-crafted work of literary fiction. While I did not identify with any of the characters, I still found myself interested in what happened to them. The story was written in the mid 1980's, and seems a bit dated, but the characters are also a bit of a time capsule, and their stories leap form the 1835 to 1885, usually at the half-decade mark, as a matter of fact.
Read quite awhile ago and probably liked it better then than I would if I reread it now. It is about the older generation and their group of friends which is where I am now. When I read it in 1988, it would not have meant as much to me as it should now but for some reason, do not feel inclined to reread. Since aging has changed so much, this might seem quite outdated.