Written with a sort of grand, pompous manner that only could spring from a mid-20th century Oxbridge pen. A style that feels as if you are being toured around some old manor, with the manor in question being “The Victorian Age.” Amusing anecdotes and charming characterizations abound; constant attempts are made to sum up the temper of the times. But all is impressionistic, and much context is assumed when he refers to the political figures of the time as if they are well known, not needing any sort of introduction. The failing is mine on that front: I just didn’t know enough about the time period in question to appreciate many of Young’s references. But when I did understand what he was on about, there wasn’t enough evidence provided or conceptual structure imposed for me to take away much.
Nonetheless, I enjoyed his sweeping historical generalizations, and the book was an interesting lens into how “the victorian age” was perceived by the early/mid 20th-century world.
Astonishing book. Just finished it after an intense period of studying it in order to present it as part of an assignementn in my postgraduate studies. I was already accustomed to some of the basics and must-reads regarding the Victorian Age (Hewitt's, Steinbach's work),but Young's essay really blew me away. It is absolutely fascinating seeing a not so distant period of history through the eyes of a man that experienced only the last part of it, nonetheless was deeply influenced by the people that affected the Victorian way of acting and thinking. Young's essay is not a mere recollection of facts and eminent figures,it's a total recreation of the identity,culture and way of living of the Victorians and how that changed through 19th and early 20th century. Even though I wouldn't recommend it as an introductory book to this specific period, I definitely think that any professional who wants to study this era definitely should give this book a try. It will shake you to your core.
G. M. Young’s Portrait of an Age ranks among the finest extended essays in the English language. It is a rare example of writing that deserves the adjective “lapidary”: nearly each sentence could be chiseled into stone. Needless to say, this essay should not be treated as a definitive history of the Victorian era—in fact, none of the judgments and characterizations Young offers here should be uncritically adopted. The style, however, it is sublime. For clarity, allusiveness, and above all elegance, it may be unsurpassed in historical writing.
Finest essay of its sort. An elegant whirlwind through the Victorian age. It demands attention, for many names are dropped that are today forgotten(Bulwer for instance). A fine book
Practically unreadable. I found it impossible to follow Young's meandering train of thought. To quote him: "A sense of vagueness, of incoherence and indirection grows on us...". Precisely!