What do you think?
Rate this book


224 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2002
Goldstein hopes to fashion a sort of common-denominator dharma that respects the diversity of traditional Buddhist teachings and practices while also being compatible with a “Western” worldview. It is perhaps inevitable that such a project would result in a kind of fuzzy, indistinct, vague sort of thing, and in this book it has.
Compassion is good, delusion is bad. On the one hand this, on the other hand just the opposite (e.g. “[m]indfulness is the quality of mind… without judgment” and then a paragraph later “[m]indfulness helps distinguish the good from the bad, the worthy from the unworthy”). If you get confused, “simply trust the integrity of [y]our seeking.”
Unwilling to describe things in precise and actionable ways, Goldstein resorts to adjectivitis:
One does not merely have an unfolding of understanding that gives a sense of direction that represents a combination of factors that provides context (which would be fuzzy enough), but one has a “larger unfolding” of “inner understanding” that gives us a “strong sense” of a “meaningful direction” that represents a “powerful combination” and a “significant context.”
One does not merely relax and notice things that arise spontaneously and are noticed effortlessly with amazing clarity, but one relaxes “more and more” and notices “certain” things that arise “quite” spontaneously, are noticed “quite” effortlessly and with “quite” amazing clarity.
The book is sparing on the Pali terminology, which is probably helpful to the typical reader who is not well-versed in the hair-splitting of the sutras. But it fails to notice that Western Buddhism has invented its own jargon (e.g. one is “grounded in” awareness or “opens to” sensation or “connects with” feeling or can “be with” a breath or “send lovingkindness” to someone) that can be just as baffling if it goes undefined or unexplained.
Goldstein seems to think that “we can simply take refuge in the basic and boundless principles of wisdom and compassion,” but this book does not simplify these things so much as it declines to wrestle with their complexity.