What do you think?
Rate this book
Maat: The Moral Ideal in Ancient Egypt
This work is a critical examination of Maat, the moral ideal in ancient Egypt. It seeks to present Maat in the language of modern moral discourse while at the same time preserving and building on its distinctiveness as a moral ideal capable of inspiring and maintaining ethical philosophic reflection. The effort here is one of both interpretation and transmission of an ethical tradition, a project in which tradition is seen not simply as a precondition and process in which one comes, but also as an ongoing product of one's efforts to understand it. Locating himself within the tradition, the author seeks to test the conceptual elasticity of its major categories and contentions and to establish its capacity for critical moral discourse
480 pages, Hardcover
First published December 1, 2003
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
July 29, 2018
While a riveting take on Ancient Egyptian moral philosophy, Karenga's presentation paints a uniform and rosey of a society with diverse cultural and religious factions. At times he exaggerates sociopolitical harmony or willfully ignores certain historical facts contrary to his thesis. While a wonderful perspective, I'd recommend all who read the text exercise caution given Karenga's troubled past and his desire to seek status as a king while transforming a history. I'd deeply appreciate a review of his work, particularly by women.
May 17, 2026
A RECOVERING AND RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ETHICAL IDEAS OF ANCIENT EGYPT
Dr. Maulana Karenga (born 1941) is an author, political activist, and is Chairman of the Africana Studies Department at CSU Long Beach; he is perhaps best known as the creator of Kwanzaa, which he developed in 1966.
He wrote in the Preface to this 2004 book, “The conceptualization and pursuit of this project have their origin in three basic sources which interlock and mutually reinforce one another, i.e., my intellectual and practical work as an Africana Studies scholar, as an ethicist and as a Seba Maat, a moral teacher, of the recovered tradition of Maatian (ancient Egyptian) ethics. First, this particular project is part of an ongoing and larger project of Africana Studies, a kind of intellectual archaeology directed toward recovering and reconstructing classical African cultures as sources of paradigms for enriching and expanding modern African intellectual discourse and culture… Related to this thrust is also an interest in enriching and expanding the discipline of Africana Studies with critical ethical discourse from both classical and modern sources in African culture---continental and diaspora… Thirdly, discussions on the value of the recovery of tradition to theorists … recall a similar emphasis by intellectuals and activists in the African American community… Fourthly, given Maatian ethics' stress on virtue, I find ... an alternative to and/or enrichment of the dominant utilitarian and deontological modes of doing ethics… Finally, I have undertaken this project as a Seba Maat, a moral teacher, of the recovered ethical tradition of Maat. As a Seba… I am interested in and involved in the intellectual and practical project of concept generation and the development of new modes of analysis of Maatian texts… I, thus, write from a definite stance as does an adherent of Ifa, Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism and other adherents within their own ethical traditions.” (Pg xiii-xiv)
He states in the first chapter, “The essential ... thrust of this work is to delineate and critically examine ‘Maat,’ the moral ideal of ancient Egypt, using the ‘Declarations of Innocence’ in the New Kingdom text, ‘The Book of Coming Forth by Day,’ and other key ethical texts… and in the process explore the usefulness of Maatian ethical thought as a resource for modern moral discourse and philosophic reflection on critical moral issues… the inquiry here is directed toward delineating the foundations of the Maat moral ideal, testing its conceptual elasticity and its fruitfulness as an ethical option in our times.” (Pg. 3-4)
He explains, “the starting-point for any serious discussion of ancient Egyptian ethics is and must be the central concept of Maat… Maat, however, is highly polysemic and apt to strike one unfamiliar with the conceptual elasticity of such ancient and central terms as lacking categorical preciseness and thus, analytical utility… It is a generally accepted fact of Egyptological studies that Maat is a fundamental, pervasive and enduring element in ancient Egyptian civilization and an inclusive and defining cultural category… The etymology of Maat… suggests an evolution from a physical concept of straightness, evenness, levelness, correctness… to a general concept of rightness… Thus, in spite of the various interpretations of Maat, Maat’s meaning as an interrelated order of rightness, including the divine, natural and social, is repeatedly affirmed… This basic concept of Maat as the foundation and order of the world lasts throughout ancient Egyptian history in a dynamic process of continuity and change.” (Pg 5-7)
He continues, “Maat as a principle and force constitutive of creation itself, comes to mean, then, an order of rightness which permeates existence and gives life… It is this meaning as natural and moral law and order that Maat has parallels with other foundational worldview principles in various other religious and ethical traditions.” (Pg. 8-9)
He clarifies, “this … is not a work in Egyptology… it is a project of moral philosophy… Secondly, the project is pursued from an African centered or Afrocentric perspective, rather than a Judeo-Christian centered or Eurocentric perspective which poses Egyptian religion as an underdeveloped ‘pagan’ project… The purpose, then, is … to explore the possibilities of genuine philosophic reflection within the renewed Maatian tradition on issues central to moral philosophy.” (Pg. 11-12)
He acknowledges, “I do not deny that there is substantial myth in ancient Egyptian religion… even as there is in Judaism, Christianity and other religions. What… [is] problematic is the tendency to overstress myth and cult and deny ancient Egypt ... genuine theology and ethics in the process. Thus, an important assumption which informs my stance is that beneath the mythological narrative lies a rational core of philosophical value… The need, then, is to treat such narratives … as sources of philosophical insight and as points of departure for developmental discourse in religion and ethics.” (Pg. 15)
Later, he adds, “because I write within a definite ethical tradition, my categories and conceptualizations will reflect this. This work began… to make live again an ancient tradition. It therefore became an act … to restore that which is in ruins and raise up that which was damaged and destroyed… This has meant using old concepts and categories in new ways and creating new ones which more accurately and usefully serve the analysis.” (Pg. 26)
He notes, “The oldest source for the category of Maat as a moral concept and practice is the ‘Pyramid Texts.’” (Pg. 42) He continues, “a fundamental source of Maatian ethics is the rich array of autobiographical statements which are called also ‘Declarations of Virtues’… In the DOV, the deceased left in the tomb or on stelae a self presentation for posterity which described an illustrious career and a praiseworthy moral personality.” (Pg. 44) Later, he adds, “The first outlines of Maatian anthropology appear in ancient Egypt’s oldest literature, the ‘Pyramid Texts,’ and continue in the other major source of ancient Egyptian ethics and theology…” (Pg. 215)
He states, “Moral theology, like all theology, evolves from questions, assumptions and critical reflection about God, the Transcendent, and ultimately turns to the meaning this has for humans and the world… Maatian moral theology is organized abound seven fundamental and interrelated points of departure, i.e., around understanding and interpretation of ... the meaning of God and especially God’s moral character and attributes for emulation…” (Pg. 135)
He asserts, “it is important to note that the concept of free will in ancient Egypt in no way approximates the modern concept of autonomy which suggests rights or will over and against society and/or community. For the ancient Egyptian the central moral issue is not choice but ‘responsiveness’… to the order of things, the divine, nature and social order.” (Pg. 253)
He says, “The fundamental point of departure for both the discourse on moral worthiness and the practice to achieve it is, in Maatian ethics, the recognition of and respect for the inherent worthiness of the human person… For the validity of any claim to moral worthiness before humans, rests on the ability to truthfully declare that one has not done anything that violates the inherent dignity of the human person.” (Pg. 317)
He notes, “‘The Declaration of Innocence,’ as a central moral document mentions woman explicitly as a category only in the disavowal of adultery found in declarations by men. Likewise, men as a category are mentioned explicitly only in the same declaration by women. This due to the fact there is in the Maatian tradition no separate moral obligations or spiritual paths for men and women… Still, the question of women’s moral status within the Maatian tradition is an important one, both in terms of its ancient uniqueness and its value as a model and meaningful focus of discussion in modern discourse, around womanist and feminist concerns for moral and spiritual traditions which [provide] a balanced, meaningful and rightful place to women’s experience, insight and contributions.” (Pg. 342)
He summarizes, “For the Maatian person, Maat is the PRINCIPLE, SUBSTANCE and PRACTICE which binds all things together… Moreover, humans are embedded in this order with its divine, social and natural aspects. In their identity as children and images of God, humans belong to the divine; in their identity as social beings, they belong to society; and in their identity as living beings they belong to nature. Thus, one must seek after Maat … in each of these areas and stand justified and worthy through moral practice in each of these areas.” (Pg. 381)
He concludes, “The governing interest of this work has been to present a critical exposition of Maat, the moral ideal in ancient Egypt… Maat is posed as the philosophical ideal and the Declarations [of Innocence] as an ideal conception of the moral practice within this framework.” (Pg. 407)
This VERY ‘detailed’ book will be of great interest to anyone studying ancient Egyptian ethics.
Dr. Maulana Karenga (born 1941) is an author, political activist, and is Chairman of the Africana Studies Department at CSU Long Beach; he is perhaps best known as the creator of Kwanzaa, which he developed in 1966.
He wrote in the Preface to this 2004 book, “The conceptualization and pursuit of this project have their origin in three basic sources which interlock and mutually reinforce one another, i.e., my intellectual and practical work as an Africana Studies scholar, as an ethicist and as a Seba Maat, a moral teacher, of the recovered tradition of Maatian (ancient Egyptian) ethics. First, this particular project is part of an ongoing and larger project of Africana Studies, a kind of intellectual archaeology directed toward recovering and reconstructing classical African cultures as sources of paradigms for enriching and expanding modern African intellectual discourse and culture… Related to this thrust is also an interest in enriching and expanding the discipline of Africana Studies with critical ethical discourse from both classical and modern sources in African culture---continental and diaspora… Thirdly, discussions on the value of the recovery of tradition to theorists … recall a similar emphasis by intellectuals and activists in the African American community… Fourthly, given Maatian ethics' stress on virtue, I find ... an alternative to and/or enrichment of the dominant utilitarian and deontological modes of doing ethics… Finally, I have undertaken this project as a Seba Maat, a moral teacher, of the recovered ethical tradition of Maat. As a Seba… I am interested in and involved in the intellectual and practical project of concept generation and the development of new modes of analysis of Maatian texts… I, thus, write from a definite stance as does an adherent of Ifa, Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism and other adherents within their own ethical traditions.” (Pg xiii-xiv)
He states in the first chapter, “The essential ... thrust of this work is to delineate and critically examine ‘Maat,’ the moral ideal of ancient Egypt, using the ‘Declarations of Innocence’ in the New Kingdom text, ‘The Book of Coming Forth by Day,’ and other key ethical texts… and in the process explore the usefulness of Maatian ethical thought as a resource for modern moral discourse and philosophic reflection on critical moral issues… the inquiry here is directed toward delineating the foundations of the Maat moral ideal, testing its conceptual elasticity and its fruitfulness as an ethical option in our times.” (Pg. 3-4)
He explains, “the starting-point for any serious discussion of ancient Egyptian ethics is and must be the central concept of Maat… Maat, however, is highly polysemic and apt to strike one unfamiliar with the conceptual elasticity of such ancient and central terms as lacking categorical preciseness and thus, analytical utility… It is a generally accepted fact of Egyptological studies that Maat is a fundamental, pervasive and enduring element in ancient Egyptian civilization and an inclusive and defining cultural category… The etymology of Maat… suggests an evolution from a physical concept of straightness, evenness, levelness, correctness… to a general concept of rightness… Thus, in spite of the various interpretations of Maat, Maat’s meaning as an interrelated order of rightness, including the divine, natural and social, is repeatedly affirmed… This basic concept of Maat as the foundation and order of the world lasts throughout ancient Egyptian history in a dynamic process of continuity and change.” (Pg 5-7)
He continues, “Maat as a principle and force constitutive of creation itself, comes to mean, then, an order of rightness which permeates existence and gives life… It is this meaning as natural and moral law and order that Maat has parallels with other foundational worldview principles in various other religious and ethical traditions.” (Pg. 8-9)
He clarifies, “this … is not a work in Egyptology… it is a project of moral philosophy… Secondly, the project is pursued from an African centered or Afrocentric perspective, rather than a Judeo-Christian centered or Eurocentric perspective which poses Egyptian religion as an underdeveloped ‘pagan’ project… The purpose, then, is … to explore the possibilities of genuine philosophic reflection within the renewed Maatian tradition on issues central to moral philosophy.” (Pg. 11-12)
He acknowledges, “I do not deny that there is substantial myth in ancient Egyptian religion… even as there is in Judaism, Christianity and other religions. What… [is] problematic is the tendency to overstress myth and cult and deny ancient Egypt ... genuine theology and ethics in the process. Thus, an important assumption which informs my stance is that beneath the mythological narrative lies a rational core of philosophical value… The need, then, is to treat such narratives … as sources of philosophical insight and as points of departure for developmental discourse in religion and ethics.” (Pg. 15)
Later, he adds, “because I write within a definite ethical tradition, my categories and conceptualizations will reflect this. This work began… to make live again an ancient tradition. It therefore became an act … to restore that which is in ruins and raise up that which was damaged and destroyed… This has meant using old concepts and categories in new ways and creating new ones which more accurately and usefully serve the analysis.” (Pg. 26)
He notes, “The oldest source for the category of Maat as a moral concept and practice is the ‘Pyramid Texts.’” (Pg. 42) He continues, “a fundamental source of Maatian ethics is the rich array of autobiographical statements which are called also ‘Declarations of Virtues’… In the DOV, the deceased left in the tomb or on stelae a self presentation for posterity which described an illustrious career and a praiseworthy moral personality.” (Pg. 44) Later, he adds, “The first outlines of Maatian anthropology appear in ancient Egypt’s oldest literature, the ‘Pyramid Texts,’ and continue in the other major source of ancient Egyptian ethics and theology…” (Pg. 215)
He states, “Moral theology, like all theology, evolves from questions, assumptions and critical reflection about God, the Transcendent, and ultimately turns to the meaning this has for humans and the world… Maatian moral theology is organized abound seven fundamental and interrelated points of departure, i.e., around understanding and interpretation of ... the meaning of God and especially God’s moral character and attributes for emulation…” (Pg. 135)
He asserts, “it is important to note that the concept of free will in ancient Egypt in no way approximates the modern concept of autonomy which suggests rights or will over and against society and/or community. For the ancient Egyptian the central moral issue is not choice but ‘responsiveness’… to the order of things, the divine, nature and social order.” (Pg. 253)
He says, “The fundamental point of departure for both the discourse on moral worthiness and the practice to achieve it is, in Maatian ethics, the recognition of and respect for the inherent worthiness of the human person… For the validity of any claim to moral worthiness before humans, rests on the ability to truthfully declare that one has not done anything that violates the inherent dignity of the human person.” (Pg. 317)
He notes, “‘The Declaration of Innocence,’ as a central moral document mentions woman explicitly as a category only in the disavowal of adultery found in declarations by men. Likewise, men as a category are mentioned explicitly only in the same declaration by women. This due to the fact there is in the Maatian tradition no separate moral obligations or spiritual paths for men and women… Still, the question of women’s moral status within the Maatian tradition is an important one, both in terms of its ancient uniqueness and its value as a model and meaningful focus of discussion in modern discourse, around womanist and feminist concerns for moral and spiritual traditions which [provide] a balanced, meaningful and rightful place to women’s experience, insight and contributions.” (Pg. 342)
He summarizes, “For the Maatian person, Maat is the PRINCIPLE, SUBSTANCE and PRACTICE which binds all things together… Moreover, humans are embedded in this order with its divine, social and natural aspects. In their identity as children and images of God, humans belong to the divine; in their identity as social beings, they belong to society; and in their identity as living beings they belong to nature. Thus, one must seek after Maat … in each of these areas and stand justified and worthy through moral practice in each of these areas.” (Pg. 381)
He concludes, “The governing interest of this work has been to present a critical exposition of Maat, the moral ideal in ancient Egypt… Maat is posed as the philosophical ideal and the Declarations [of Innocence] as an ideal conception of the moral practice within this framework.” (Pg. 407)
This VERY ‘detailed’ book will be of great interest to anyone studying ancient Egyptian ethics.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews