I'd like to begin this review by acknowledging the fact that this book seems to have helped a lot of people connect to their creative selves, and for that reason I am glad of its existence. My experience with this book was multifaceted, but ultimately very unpleasant. I did take the program very seriously: up until Week 9 I completed the exercises and morning pages as prescribed (although it took me a year-and-a-half to do so).
I've read on here many people describing this book as pseudo-psychological, self-centered, spiritual bullshit. Let me just say that I can definitely see why these claims were made. Cameron is very prescriptive and preachy, writing often in the collective "we." For example, from page 165 in Week 10, "Blocked, we know who and what we are: unhappy people. Unblocked, we may be something much more threatening--happy." Don't even get me started on the atrocious black-and-white sentiment here. What bothers me so much about this approach is her assumption that everyone is simply on the same page as her, with the same privileges, experiences, and emotional backgrounds. I don't care that it was written in the early '90s; not once does she mention how class, race, or even gender may affect one's access to creative modes and spaces.
To Cameron, the only things standing in the way of reaching your True Creative Self are your friends and family members--at one point she urges you to label them as "Wet Blankets"--and your lack of faith in god. For someone whose creative "success" seems to be almost exclusively tied to The Artist's Way franchise, she has an awful lot of rules and self-assurance that her ideas about creative living are inarguably True. It's been said that she modeled this program after the AA 12-step program. I do not deny that 12-step programs are effective and life-saving for many people--just that they're not for everyone. Cameron's adaptation of 12-step philosophies to creativity is a little extreme, in my opinion. She treats creative expression as a life-or-death matter, and unfortunately I internalized her opinions as facts for some time. And again, she never mentions structural issues like systemic racism, capitalism, or differing values that may impede one's ability to be a flourishing creative angel.
The morning pages were helpful for me for awhile until I realized I began to ruminate more than I was clearing my head. I do love the idea of the "artist's dates," though, and will definitely try to incorporate these into my life more frequently. In short, I do not recommend this book. If you are interested, I suggest reading it with a healthy dose of skepticism. Don't let her bully you into believing your life isn't full and beautiful unless you're creating masterpieces on the daily.