There are a lot of books that I read these days that I know that I will never return to again. But this book might be useful for later on, and I'm more willing to keep it. I think this book should not be advertised as a “Hoodoo book,” it should be advertised as a book about the author's blending of folk magic, Hoodoo, and neo-wicca. There are many things in this book which reminds me of Hoodoo (from the types of spells presented here to listening to plants to the herbs being used to how you use the various oils and more). But it has too much of the neo-wiccan influences in it for me to call it purely a Hoodoo manuscript.
It is the biggest drawback of this book that author customized Hoodoo for a neo-pagan/neo-wiccan mind set, rather than just documenting Hoodoo as it is. In fact, it's almost like the author did it just to get your foot in the door because as soon as it gets into the later chapters, all the neo-wiccan/neo-pagan influence seems to evaporate. We get the classic conversation about Saints and their place in Hoodoo and in some cases Vodun as de facto – hidden representations for different African spirits and deities. Likewise the general use of different types of magic that includes Catholic chants and prayers, angels, pslamic magic, and other aspects of this type. I know a lot of neo-pagans and neo-wiccans don't want to see Christianity in their occultism. But it is important to note that Christianity has it's hand in many different occult practices and folk magic practices.
Much of the beginning of the book, as I said, dedicated to the neo-wiccan/neo-pagan audience, and that really is shone in the beginning chapter “What is Magick?” The use of that spelling is directly linked to a quote by Aleister Crowley, which is extremely common in a lot of new age books. Here's the deal though, Crowley has no business being in a Hoodoo book for a couple of reasons. The first is because he doesn't recognize any magic that has no divine influence in it as real, which some of the magic presented in Hoodoo lacks a definite or specific divine influence. Likewise he was a huge racist, and I doubt he would want to be associated with a magical practice that originated out of the Slave Trade. There's an implication because he is in the introduction that Crowley some how created Hoodoo, which is beyond belief. It is extremely inappropriate on so many levels to have him in this introduction to Hoodoo.
Moving away from that - one good thing that this book does, is it specifically addresses the fact witches are not the only people who practice magick/magic. In my opinion that is something that a lot of witches today need to be reminded of because spellwork tends to dip so far into witchcraft that these other practices get left out of the conversation when it comes to what makes a spell a spell. Unfortunately, the author makes it clear that a witch is someone who practices the “Old Religion” aka Wicca. That is incorrect because a witch can practice many different things and is not limited to wicca.
In making this book more geared toward the neo-pagan and neo-wiccan audiences, some of the descriptions of how the spells or charms work, is through that lense. For example, the gris-gris bag is described more like a talisman than a spirit house, which is what I am familiar with it being. The weekly feeding of the bag with oil and other items, is explained something along the lines of a psychological thing or faith thing or “universal mind” thought based thing, rather than an animistic force that needs to be kept up and maintained.
Likewise, the neo-wiccan/neo-pagan-izing of the spells can be seen in some of the chanting in this book. It specifically rhymes, which is something that I see in spells related to a neo-wiccan or neo-pagan fashion and not something I see in folk magic. When you start digging into some of the other rituals, such as the ones that have Catholic bases, the rhyming stops immediately. Let's be clear here, the rhyming schemes are not complex nor do they change. They are only the < A A B B> rhyming scheme, which is very much a marker of many types of neo-wiccan or neo-pagan spells. And sometimes, the rhyme doesn't make much sense and forces the language to fit that rhyming scheme. I'll give an example of this rhyming scheme < A A B B> below:
“Protection comes to you this day,
this crossed condition no longer has sway.
Returning this negativity
to the one who has crossed thee.” (p. 82)
I do want to get into some of the other problematic elements contained within the context of the book itself. This author does what every author seems to do in the New Age section. They cite some “ancient people” in order to give legitimacy to their practice. There's almost no sourcing for any of the material in here which gets talked about, even to the point of lumping all Celtic cultures together as “Ancient Celts.” Likewise lumping “American Indians” all together and saying they all have peace pipes while describing incense. It is particularly annoying that the author does not even try to source things out of the Slave Trade, or completely ignores it in their description of what's going on with the magic. Instead of trying to legitimatize the practice through these mysterious people, the author should be looking at the origins of Hoodoo as something that came particularly from African slaves. The only conversation we get about that is in relationship to the Saints as representations of African spirits and deities. In my opinion, this obscuring where Hoodoo comes from, seems a bit... a bit suspicious, especially because – if the goodreads author picture is correct – the author is a white man. Especially when there is use of slurs for Rromani people in this book, which makes me that much more suspicious of the author.
Secondly, there is a definitely an underlying problem of heterosexual normativity and binary gender normativity. The author frequently uses “his/her” for pronouns, which to be frank, if we can get everyone to stop saying that it would be a blessing. Likewise it is /implied/ that all women menstruate and are only interested in men because yet again we have another book talking about feeding menses to people unaware of what they are eating. To top the cake, the wedding spell is definitely for a heterosexual couple as well.
Finally, I do have some thoughts about one particular spell in this book – and it's the Domestic Violence spell. Domestic Violence often comes with Spousal abuse, and frankly this spell is more about trying to “get everyone to get along” as if the Dome tic Violence is equally distributed amongst the partners. That's not the case. Domestic Violence and Spousal abuse are specifically about power. It is not done equally because the abuser is specifically trying to dominate and domineer over their partner(s). Saying the victim is doing the exact same thing to the abuser is what the abuser likes to pretend is happening. That it is just a normal argument between parties, when really it's just abuse. I cannot sit back and normalize Domestic Violence and Spousal Abuse. It is not normal, it is not okay. It is frankly not okay to bind the victim from fighting back or resisting, which is what happens in this spell by binding the victim's will and ability to fight. Domestic Violence and Spousal abuse often bleeds into Child Abuse as well. Something which again, the spell tries to normalize that it's happening “equally” and needs to be peacefully resolved, or “calmed down.” The suppression aspect of this spell makes me super uncomfortable and frankly, it is very damaging. I just needed to be explicitly clear that it was not okay to have that in this book the way it is presented.
In summary, this book is very much a unique blend of folk magic, hoodoo, neo-wiccan/neo-pagan magic that is specific to the author. Unfortunately, it has many problems that can't be ignored because of the content of the book and the way it has been presented. I wish this book had been more willing to be just a Hoodoo manuscript, I also wish that this book had some better elements.