Vedanta. Practice or Theology?
I am reasonably certain that mindfulness practises and meditation are extremely beneficial and very important. Important in the sense of, ‘come with me if you want to live’. The book describes some of this. And I think quite well. But the precise words are not particularly important. Use whatever ones work for you. Or use none at all. But above all don’t be mislead by them. Just do the practises and the meditation. Or remain wrapped up in nonsense, fakery and illusion.
In the book there is unfortunately just the hint of factionalism. There are varying traditions and bodies of knowledge along these lines. Each a little different. Consider the sheer odiousness of, ‘my Kung fu is better than your kung fu’. Especially when one of the core meanings of the words ‘Kung Fu’ is excellence. The idea/pretension/presumption of knowing for certain the absolute truth is a dangerous and misleading one. Down those lines lies, ‘There can be only one’. And we have all seen where that kind of thinking leads.
And as for all the theology, flurry of words, fluffy speculative metaphysics, ontological reifications ... Is it really necessary? Does it help at all? Does it even really make any sense? I am God, you are God, the Absolute beyond all thought ... Yeah. Whatever. I find a cool, considered “Don’t know” to be vastly preferable. And to limit my theorising to relatively simple things that demonstrably work like quantum field theory or neuroscience. Maybe some of our distant descendants will understand it all intellectually. Maybe not. Who knows. Maybe when it comes to the World what you see is more or less what you get. Which does not in any way negate the importance of meditation and mindfulness.
The important thing for us is what we CAN do, here and now. Don’t live in fantasy - especially someone else’s. Stop. Listen. Awareness. The right sort of Attention and effort. This is what I get out of these types of books. Nothing more and nothing less.