'My story begins in Magdala, a city by the sea...'
Synopsis:
A book in which we kind of, sort of, possibly, maybe, get the full story of Mary Magdalene. Maybe. Kinda. Sorta. Perhaps-ish.
Biblio-Babble
True Believers: Where you stand as a Christian, as well as how literally you take the Bible, is going to be a key factor in how well you’re going to take the contents of this book. I prefer to think of myself as in the middle. I’m not an atheist (obviously), but I’m not a Bible thumper, either. I’m what one would probably call a ‘moderate Christian’, if such a term does exist. I don’t take the Bible literally, but I’m also open to historical interpretation.
If you are a person who takes the Bible literally, DO. NOT. READ. THIS. BOOK. You’ll probably want to drop kick it to the floor and toss it into the 13th Realm of Hellfire and Damnation. The author completely turns the Bible upside down, sideways and backwards in creating her version of Mary Magdalene, something that most die-hard Christians won’t take a liking to. Even Jesus gets a complete makeover in this novel, as he’s given a more human personality (and siblings!).
Mary Magdalene, She’s Only Human: We’ve come to know Mary Magdalene, the fallen woman. Mary Magdalene, the prostitute. This being the second book about Mary that I’ve read this year, I’ve even come to know Mary Magdalene the girl with epileptic seizures who saw visions. What I wasn’t expecting was Mary Magdalene, the revenge-fueled, mad as hell woman I got in this novel. In short, she’s human. Her life has been absolute crap, and she naturally wants revenge on those who wronged her. Nothing wrong with that, but as Christians we tend to paint Biblical figures as rather saintly individuals who can do no wrong and are about as pure as Swiss Alp water. However, this Mary Magdalene is entirely human and subjected to the darker side of human emotions. Again, this probably isn’t going to sit well with die-hard Bible thumpers. Especially since her inability to forgive those who wronged her (a major teaching in Christianity), has been a concern with those who read it.
Jesus Loves Me, But I Can’t Find Him: Not in that sense, of course. Even though this is Mary Magdalene’s story and she should be the star of the show, Jesus also played a really important part in her life. Unfortunately, he didn’t get nearly enough screen time than what I was hoping for. He’s obviously there for the important moments, but not enough where I really got to know him as a character more. Especially considering the fact that the author decided to quash my dreams of Jesus being the most famous member of the Only Child Club and decided to give him siblings. I actually would have much preferred her exploring how Mary intersected with Jesus’s family and personal life, as well as the other disciples, than the fictional story arc about Atticus and Cyrilla.
They Don’t Even Go Here: The book bounces back and forth between first person Mary Magdalene telling her story and the fictional story of a Roman general named Atticus, his partner Cyrilla and son Quinn whose fate is mysteriously intertwined with hers. It’s not like it’s a huge secret, as you can basically figure it out within the first couple hundred pages, but it’s enough of a spoiler and plot line that it probably shouldn’t even be mentioned here. I didn’t have an issue with the characters themselves. Rather, I had an issue as to why they were put in the story. When a book is blatantly historical fiction, it can be forgiven and accepted that there will be some fictional counterparts. When a book is marketed as not historical fiction, but historically researched fact, than fictional characters not included in that person’s history are kind of like party crashers interloping in time. In that sense, Atticus and his family were historical party crashers. Their story like would have been suited to a separate book where Mary Magdalene and Jesus were more background characters. The inclusion of them bogged down the story a lot of the time as the narration style was jarring to switch back and forth from.
Yeah, We Get It Katherine, But Is This Book Accurate?: I can’t really say. The Bible is one of those books that is open to interpretation at an almost ridiculous level. The wording can be twisted and manipulated to fit a person’s message and meaning that the real, true intent of the book probably has been long lost. There’s so many different types of research and characterizations about the real Mary Magdalene that some historians don’t even know who the heck the true woman really was. So for someone asking whether this Mary Magdalene is the definitive Mary Magdalene, the answer is…. a frustrating ‘I don’t know.’ I believe that the author intended it that way, but there are too few snippets of Mary in the holy book and too much speculation from historians about her life to give an answer that will satisfy true believers.
*********************
A seemingly well-researched and readable but jarring take on one of the most controversial women of the Bible. Except from what is written, readers will come out of the book feeling just as lost as when they came in, and quite possibly more enraged at the tarnishing of not only Mary, but their beloved Disciple.