Captives. Tom Pow. New Milford: Roaring Book Press, 2007. 192 pp.
Reviewed by: Gwendolyn
Tom Pow’s book Captives leads you through the journey of a group of captives held hostage by guerrillas seeking to raise awareness to the local government. Unfortunately, Captives lacks to grab the reader’s attention, apposes Biblical morals, the effectiveness of the gorilla’s plot is unrealistic, and it makes clear Pow’s ultimate need for a Savior.
Captives takes place in the remote jungles of the Caribbean island Santa Clara. Sixteen-year old Martin and his family join two other families on what is believed to be an adventurous tour through some of the mountains on the island. However, everything goes terribly wrong when they are kidnapped and taken hostage by a group of guerrillas. They are scared for their lives, as well as for Martin's brother and two other tourists who supposedly escaped their capture by the guerrillas. The captives are pushed to their physical and emotional limits for the next month, as they are forced into the heart of the island's dense jungles, and farther away form any sign of possible rescue. Also, as they venture on through the jungles together, they end up learning the guerrillas' reasoning behind their captivity. They planned the scheme in hopes to bring awareness to the politics and the harsh world of Santa Clara that is not seen in its tourism, and to change the government's influence on the economic destruction that was ruining the common folk of Santa Clara.
One major downfall of the book Captives is its lack to keep one’s attention. The book had an interesting storyline and plot, which intrigues me to read the book in the first place. Its not often you hear of books where vacations are ruined due to the fact that the tourists are kidnapped and taken hostage by guerrillas.Unfortunately, once I began reading Captives, I noticed that my mind was continually wandering and the book seemed to lag on. Another aspect of the book that caused me to loose interest was the fact that it was a two-part story. One part from the father's perspective and the second from the son Martin’s. The first part of the book was a diary of the father, and the second part was of Martin's account of the kidnapping. The writing styles of the two were too similar though, so at times it felt like I was reading the book twice.
Also, Captives strongly portrayed a series of unbiblical morals throughout the book. Two of the main subjects that didn’t morally line up with the Bible were the frequent use of God’s name in vain, and the encouragement of sex before marriage. For instance, every time Martin and his family were in situations they didn’t like they took the name of God in vain profusely. Then, to my astonishment the parents actually encouraged their children to make separate huts and to sleep with the other teenagers as a means of enjoyment and comfort throughout their captivity.
In addition, I found the effectiveness of the guerilla’s plot completely unrealistic. The chances of them actually winning their rights as the people of Santa Clara again in exchange for the hostages were slim to none. I believe Pow could have used a more effective, and interesting reason for the tourists being captured. By doing this, it could have completely reshaped the book, and actually made it an interesting and memorable read.
Lastly, Pow’s book Captives shows where he is in his spiritual walk with God. Many messages that Pow is preaching through Captives go against Biblical principles and are clearly talking directly to a worldly minded audience. One of the main examples of this is in the encouragement of sex before marriage. Overall, it makes Pow’s ultimate need for a Savior obvious.
In conclusion, Captives fails to grab the reader’s attention, goes against Biblical morals, the efficiency of the gorilla’s scheme is impractical, and demonstrates Pow’s ultimate need for a Savior. Captives is by far not an enjoyable read, and fails to achieve much of a purpose throughout its plot. This is not a book worth picking up, and I would highly recommend never reading it.