Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Textual and Literary Criticism

Rate this book
The literary critic tends to think that the textual scholar or bibliographer, happily occupied in his travel drudgery, has not much to say that he would care to hear, so there is a gulf between them. Professor Bowers advances to the edge of this gulf and says several forceful things across it; they turn out to be important and interesting, though occasionally scathing. The first chapter reminds us that the literary critic can only criticise with confidence when the textual critic has established what the author wrote; Professor Bowers indicates how very much has yet to be done. The second chapter takes a particular case, Walt Whitman's copy' for the 1860 edition of Leaves of Grass, and shows how the bibliographer can, by ingenious but rigorous deduction, give an insight into the growth of an author's conception of the nature and aim of his work. The other two lectures, on Shakespeare and other early dramatic texts, will show non-specialists the striking advances in editorial technique, and the growth of standards of scholarship in these studies.

200 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1959

18 people want to read

About the author

Fredson Bowers

217 books5 followers
Fredson Thayer Bowers was an American bibliographer and scholar of textual editing.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
6 (50%)
4 stars
5 (41%)
3 stars
1 (8%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Eddie Vega.
Author 19 books17 followers
February 1, 2012
A revolutionary work that remains fresh even after fifty-three years' passage. A must read for those following the eBook vs. print book debate. Bowers digs deep into the history of texts and how printing errors sometimes created embarassingly wrong interpretations of literary works.
Profile Image for Nigel Lepianka.
3 reviews1 follower
December 26, 2016
The most surprising thing about this text is how close Bowers gets to the arguments and trains of thought that D. F. McKenzie and Jerome McGann would eventually pick up and use to radically reshape textual scholarship. It's otherwise classic Bowers, and informative.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.