Drawing on a wealth of expertise from an international team of contributors, the second edition of International Relations Theories presents a diverse selection of theoretical positions.
Arguing that theory is central to explaining the dynamics of world politics, editors Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith cover a wide variety of theoretical positions--from the historically dominant traditions to powerful critical voices since the 1980s. The editors have brought together a team of international contributors, each specializing in a different theory. The contributors explain the theoretical background to their positions before showing how and why their theories matter. The book opens up space for analysis and debate, allowing students to decide which theories they find most useful in explaining and understanding international relations.
FEATURES
* Brings together perspectives from leading authors
* Combines theory and practice through extensive case study sections at the end of each chapter, providing students with the opportunity for debate and discussion
* Provides an extensive range of pedagogical features throughout
* Supplemented by a Companion Website (www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199548866) containing weblinks, a flashcard glossary, a revision guide, figures and tables from the textbook, and PowerPoint lecture slides
NEW TO THIS EDITION
* Thoroughly revised and updated to reflect new developments in the field
* Brand-new chapter on Normative International Relations Theory (Chapter 2)
* New "key text" boxes highlighting important topics covered within each chapter
First of all, I don't know how a book with so many typos and grammatical errors ever made it to publishing. That's besides the point, though, as my main complaint with this book is that it explained things in much more confusing terms than necessary. This book seems to take the idea that if there's a bigger word for something simple, you should use it. I don't mind big words, but when a concept is being taught to you for the first time (and this is an intro to IR textbook), it's definitely not the most helpful strategy. The authors also went off on distracting tangents, often writing about the disagreements within single theories instead of explaining how those theories relate to others. All in all, this book made my IR class harder than it had to be.
I finished reading this best academic book about IR and Global Politics, so in general the discipline of International Relations is very large with various ways, and it's like Mathematics and how to analyse this world according the IR theories and how transform them from theoretical way to practical one
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity edited by Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith is a pretty good textbook that does exactly what is advertised. I think the language might be a bit too much for those uninitiated into social science, so perhaps this isn't for your freshman seminar, but it is a readily accessible book that covers most of the major theories. Not all theories are created equal, especially if you believe in the scientific method and various empirical and positivist approaches to knowledge creation, but it is decent enough to provide an overview to each of them written by an advocate. Some defend their subjects well, others poorly, but each are authentic to the pedagogy and theoretical approach they espouse. This is a useful book to read if you're serious about IR Theory or are thinking about majoring in it for undergrad.
I will say that most political scientists don't hew too closely to big theory most of the time, so take what you can from the book without getting the wrong idea about the day to day research approaches of most IR scholars.
This was the textbook for my Global Issues class this term. It was valuable in the sense that I have never truly studied International Relations before, so I was unfamiliar with the different lenses from which people perceive and interact on the international stage. And those are lessons that I will take with me as I look to work in the international field.
However. I take serious issue with a lot of the writing in this textbook. So much of the language used in the textbook is so unnecessarily complicated, to the point where I imagine it would be completely inaccessible for the majority of readers. Even for me, as someone that is deeply interested in learning about this topic and who reads a lot, it was very difficult for me to get through at times.
If I have learned anything from my studies this term, it is that shutting out the people from the margins and only talking to those in the inner circle is going to get us nowhere. Writing a book about international relations and how people interact on the global stage, but writing solely for a very small, very privileged group of academics is so ironic it's almost laughable.
The book is structured with each chapter introducing a different school of IR. Some are fine, in that they actually have explanatory power or accurately describe reality, the marxist school particularly, but so much of the book, and apparently much of IR theory, is just inane wish-casting and blind to how american power structures all of the world's relations, even in the downturn of the unipolar moment. Another strikingly annoying aspect is the claim some IR schools make that certain states are driven in any way by universalist principles is completely disproven by the mere existence of the state of Israel and it's backing by the west.
I wish I would have completed this textbook prior to my portfolio defense. I feel better prepared and understand the best approach to take in order to speak to the different theories in International Relations and how they can be used in different contexts to assess events and potential outcomes. This is a great reference book for anyone looking for something to read.
This book is an amazing starter for understanding International Relations Theories. It is a good reference as well to use in papers and reflect on the theories. I like the style that the book introduces them clearly and propose good comprehension generally.
Excellent survey of the variety of schools of thought in the field of international relations. Sometimes speaks from a privileged Western-centric perspective, but remains well-rounded nonetheless.
I taught an International Relations class to my seniors at a gifted school using this book. It covers all the basic theories of International Relations from Realpolitik, to various offshoots of the theory of engagement, to even a theory for environmentalists. I like the basic discussion of the theories, as they were succinct, and came with great examples. The discussions of the various schools of thought were fragmented, sprinkled throughout the text, and required much digging and collating to make sense to the students. The book was less expensive than other texts (by far) and had a balanced approach to the subject which did not lean either East nor West in its approach. This book is primarily oriented towards serious students of International Relations and it is academic in its presentation. So, if you are wanting to go deep and in detail on IR this is your book. It is very readable, but written for graduate students, or very bright undergrads or senior high schoolers.
Good overview of theories in IR, the "metatheoretical" chapters on more fundamental differences between theories (epistemology etc.) are particularly useful. The authors of each chapter seem sometimes a bit too convinced of the theory they cover, which is particularly true of Mearsheimer on structural realism. I agree with other reviewers on the relationships between different theories being somewhat unclear at times, but this could be a consequence of IR theory being chaotic in general.
To improve on the above, I wish different theories were presented in a more uniform format. While I appreciate the very helpful case studies, some chapters were very historical while e.g. the chapter on liberalism focused almost entirely on presenting an empirical paper.
My first real philosophy book from an academic standpoint! It was like the IS book written by various authors so the writing style was good and bad at times. However, it did cover theoretial subjects quite well and I thought it was useful as a text when I studied theory. I'm glad I'm done with it though. Now I don't need to worry much more about critical theory, ie poststructuralism (that I presented a class on!), feminism, and constructivism. I wish I would have gotten the other bigger book by Steve Smith instead which I felt was much more informative, eventhough he was a coeditor in this one.
Acho que esse foi o manual que eu mais gostei de ter contato durante a graduação. Te oferece uma visão bem ampla dos diversos caminhos possíveis dentro das RI (as teorias que surgem dentro da própria disciplina e as teorias aplicáveis das ciências sociais em geral), para muito além do positivismo.
Também aborda os diversos debates que ocorreram na disciplina e ainda traz estudos de caso pra ilustrar cada teoria. Gosto bastante das abordagens mais críticas e sinto que esse livro foi muito importante no meu processo de entendimento delas.
A mixed bag. Each approach gets a chapter by it's noted scholar, which may sound like a good idea - who better to explain than a proponent? But the book reads as if some contributors could not decide whether to explain or advance their favorite position and they end up doing neither.
I used this text for a master's level IR class spring 2010. Some early chapters assume knowledge about theoretical material explained in later chapters, which made it difficult for students new to the material.
It's a great book in International Relations theories with all recently debates in them supported by case studies. I recommend it for Arab students in IR.
Also, all my best appreciation to Arabic language translator Ms. Dima AlKhathra for all her efforts in translation this excellent book.
A very insightful textbook that explores the diverse theories on International Relations. Including Classical Realism, Structural Realism, Liberalism, Neoliberalism, The English School, Marxism, Critical Theory, Constructivism, Feminism, Poststructuralism, Postcolonialism, and Green Theory. Case studies for every theory is included at the end of each chapter to further put the underpinning tools of analysis at display.